Archive for the ‘Innovation in print’ Category

h1

Reimagining The Women’s Magazine: The Redbook Way. Jill Herzig and Mary Morgan Reinvent Redbook for 21st Century Women

March 12, 2013

REDBOOKIn the magazine media industry, listening to your customer – that audience of one – is vital. You have to have large ears and an open mind. There’s no other way to approach success for your publication without the people who occupy the head offices of the magazine having the previously described features.

That being said – Jill Herzig and Mary Morgan, editor in chief and publisher/chief revenue officer respectively, of Redbook Magazine, redefine those characteristics as they embarked on the latest “reimagined” magazine.

Herzig and Morgan have researched and surveyed their audience and discovered what they want: a down-to-earth, reality-based magazine that is a handbook for fashion and style for today’s busy woman. So they’re giving it to them, reinforcing the belief that if you give them what they want, they’ll find what they need.

I had the opportunity to meet Jill and Mary at the offices of Redbook magazine, at the Hearst Tower in New York City. The new Redbook just arrived. The April issue (on the newsstands today) ushers a brand new magazine, reinvented and reimagined. The new cover design and approach scream at you, wow you and stop you in your tracks. A job very well done, and it shows.

I started my stream of questions and the answers were dashing back in stereo, in unison.

TEAM REDInvesting in this new print version in a digital age was never a quandary for the two visionary’s at Redbook’s helm, recognizing the progression of crossover high-fashion into retail marketing as their key to the door of the consumer’s fantasy-turned-reality. And ascertaining that print magazines are still the rainbows that lead to that particular pot of gold as no other medium does. It’s a relevant concept, with relevant content, for a relevant customer, something that must be in place when you reinvent any entity for the buying public. Herzig and Morgan recognize that fact.

Redbook’s new face belongs to any age group of women, but as Herzig said, “I would say that she’s a woman in her 30s and 40s and she can be from any town in America.”

Knowing their audience and marketing that percentile is very important to her. It’s the foundation for Redbook’s new structure and it has to be a sturdy and felicitous one for all involved.

While they know the print reinvention is paramount to the success of their venture, they also recognize that print and digital must coexist in today’s world. It’s an absolute.

Enter a new mobile app that makes shopping from your smart phone simple: the technology of Eye Capture. With Eye Capture you can take a picture of the entire activated page and are offered a screen full of images and magazine-approved links of content that’s directly related to what’s on that page. Every page and not just a few selected pages in the magazine are digitally integrated. Herzig and Morgan are very excited about the simultaneous debut of both the app and the new Redbook Magazine. To them, this is how print and digital can work together to bring the reader the most enjoyable and memorable experience ever. And after all, isn’t that what magazines are here to do?

In the scheme of things, what Redbook is doing is very important to the magazine media industry today. They are paving the way for other publications to realize the potential of making a niche for your magazine. Targeting and redefining your audience and then pairing the results up with a digital package that goes hand-in-hand with your print entity is the answer to a lot of questions out there today about how to make magazines more successful and relevant for the reader.

No matter how old your magazine is, creativity and good leadership are always essential to keeping the brand alive and going. I left my interview with Herzig and Morgan reassured that there are some leaders in the magazine media industry who are still full of passion, emotion and yes, gutsy moves based on some solid connectivity with the customers.

To read my entire interview with Jill Herzig, editor in chief, and Mary Morgan, publisher and chief revenue officer, of Redbook, click here.

h1

Mr. Magazine™ Minute: Michael Rooney, Chief Revenue Officer, The Wall Street Journal, on the Launch of WSJ’s New Print Magazine & The Power of Print in a Digital Age

March 7, 2013

The Wall Street Journal is launching a new quarterly magazine called WSJ.MONEY on Saturday. I asked Michael Rooney, the Journal’s chief revenue officer about why the Journal is launching a new print title just a few months after killing Smart Money magazine? His answer, and his take on the power of print in a digital age are in this Mr. Magazine™ Minute:

h1

Mr. Magazine™ Minute: Mary Berner Identifies the Place of Print in Magazine Media

March 6, 2013

When Mary Berner was named president and chief executive officer of MPA – The Association of Magazine Media last September, one of her first edicts was to ensure that the word “media” followed the word “magazine” every time it was used. I asked Ms. Berner about the place of print in the magazine media mix. Her answer appears below in the Mr. Magazine™ Minute. Enjoy.

h1

Digital Heaven or Immortal Hell? Why Print Needs Print to Survive in a Digital Age? The Mr. Magazine™ Webcast…

March 1, 2013

On Wed. Feb. 27 I gave a webcast on the topic Digital Heaven or Immortal Hell. The webcast via CommPRO.biz was produced by Onstream Media and sponsored by Akamai Technologies.
The webcast in its entirety is posted below. Enjoy and feel free to comment or ask more questions. Click on the link below to watch the webcast.

h1

Don’t Forget to PEG Your Magazine Media: Add Passion, Emotion, and Guts to Your Daily Regimen… And Please Take Your Vitamin Cs… Mr. Magazine™’s Prescription for a New Magazine Media Business Model

February 20, 2013

TIMEreader's digestWhen DeWitt Wallace shopped his idea of Reader’s Digest to every major magazine publisher in New York City in 1920 he was faced by one rejection after the other. When Henry Luce launched Sports Illustrated in 1954 he was not disheartened when the magazine lost money for 12 years. Wallace went on to publish Reader’s Digest on his own in 1922 and Luce stuck with Sports Illustrated making it the largest sports weekly magazine in the world.

Both men were passionate about the subject matter, emotional about the content and staunch believers in what their gut told them to do.

This is a far cry from today’s owners of the magazine media, most of whom have no editorial background whatsoever. Luce and Wallace were editor’s first, business folks second. They knew good editorial content when they saw it and they knew the value of such editorial in reaching customers, both readers and advertisers.

Rolling stonelilo playboy 131211Wine SpectatorHugh Hefner , Jann Wenner and Marvin Shanken are but three remaining editors/publishers who still act from their emotion, passion and, above all, guts. All three have been overseeing both the business and the editorial side of their respective magazines.

Luce must be turning in his grave hearing the news of the eminent sale of his creation Time Inc. and Wallace has probably flipped completely over by now.

I know history shouldn’t repeat itself, but it was, still is, and will continue to be a great instructor, teaching you to live in the present, but plan for the future.

However, I know that the magazine media today must undergo a transformation if it is to thrive, as well as survive. Because if they can’t make it today, why should they care about tomorrow? It’s as simple as that, and as complex.

The old business model of the passion driven and need-based product is changing into a numbers driven and want-based existence that requires a complete shake-up of the magazine media’s ideas and the very foundations the industry has been built on for the last 150 years. That good-old, complacently-content magazine familiar won’t fly in this digital age, or so they tell us. The bubble has burst. On that, I think we can all agree.

The new model today is synonymous with the statement: If I give you what you want, you will find what you need.

Think about that for a second. Just let it really sink in. If I give you what you want, you will find what you need.

And to empower that declaration into action, you need the mega-boost of some very potent vitamins…and I have them.

The Vitamin Cs for magazine media …the new business model in action.

Customer: From Mass to One…
Content: From Who, What, When, Where, Why and How to What Is In It For Me…
Commerce: From See and Buy, to Produce, Introduce and Buy…
Community: From Melting Pot to Birds of a Feather…

No longer are we, the media in charge. There’s no possible way, with all the choices out there, that as an industry we can possibly believe that we dictate what our customer’s will and will not consume when it comes to their media experiences. No way.
That is foolish thinking and just won’t wash anymore.

There are two types of customers that exist in our world and must be satisfied: the audience of one and the advertiser. Without either of these two, we’re sunk before we leave port.

Both customers: the audience (albeit a reader, viewer, listener, or user) and the advertisers have another 3 Vitamin Cs they enjoy and cherish: control, choice and comfort. Both are now more in control of their destiny than ever before, both have plenty of choices and both are looking for this comfort zone they call their own.

But out of those two, the audience of one is the most important. Why, you might ask? Why, when advertising dollars far surpass any single subscription or cover price of an individual consumer.

The answer is simple: the audience of one is twice the customer. Has the train jumped the track with you in it on that statement? If so, I’ll be happy to explain. The audience of one is our buying public, our reason for existing; they nail down our homes on the newsstands and keep them secure. But they’re also the reason the advertisers exist; they are the glue that sticks their products to the store shelves. Without nails and glue, our products would be free-floating, like a balloon in the sky, floating up, up and away…never to be seen again. And that would not be a good thing.

So we’re selling content to our audience and our advertisers are fishing for those audiences any way they can catch them.

So our second Vitamin C – Content – is vital to the body of our new business model. However our content today is in no way your father’s content. No ledes with journalists’ best friends Who, What, When, Where, Why and How, but rather What Is In It For Me, the WIIIFM factor. Note the three IIIs in the WIIIFM factor. It is all about me, the audience of one. The heart of our being can’t live without content. So it’s got to be the best and most significant information and entertainment that it can be for our customers.
There is no shortage of information out there. Between the social media, the constant e-mail updates, the Tweets and the re-Tweets, our customers are wired and “on” at all times. So the information we supply them must exceed their expectations and define what they’re looking for. That’s why priority number one for media publishers today should be content curation and solution creation.

Remember our job now can be summed up in three things: content curators, solution creators and experience makers.

Commerce is that wonderful buying and selling we call capitalism that we all know and love. But today, with our audience of one in control, it has to be more than that random ad placed on that random page hoping for that random sell. It has to be much more targeted and geared toward that audience of one.

I offer you a sunny-day-at-the-lake scenario for your consideration: The content of our product is the bait, the advertisers are the fishermen bringing their poles, and the audience of one, our top priority, is the fish. So it’s very apparent that the selection of the bait determines the fish we’re going to catch. Therefore it’s up to the fisherman to choose well.

But more than that, media publishers need to realize that we’re in the business of selling to make a profit too. That’s why the new business model proposes divvying up the fish, so that the advertisers aren’t the only fishermen in the boat. We need to share in that common stream of revenue and be creative and interactive with our advertisers and our audience of one. We have to engage in this fishing tournament for the sake of that singular audience member, to ensure we are the ones providing his or her experience from that moment on. Because, folks, the lake is too big for just a few anglers; we’re not just providing the bait anymore, we’re bringing our rod and reels too.

That’s why in our day and age endemic ads make perfect sense. If you’re a children’s magazine, for example, why would you advertise Harley Davidson’s in that publication? It just doesn’t make sense that a fisherman would choose tadpoles, when he or she would catch more fish with worms.

Relevant message to a relevant audience via the relevant medium… just pure common sense.

Community is our 4th vitamin in the bottle. In this age of Infinite Transcended Media, we are no longer one big happy family who excludes outsiders and panders to the egos of our own kind. ‘Our own kind’ simply doesn’t exist anymore. Today we are clusters of communities; the melting pot has become a melting vat instead. And the ultimate goal of any person within that huge vat is to belong to a community. We have to treat our customers like members of our community. Birds of a feather flock together. It isn’t just an old, outdated saying. If you live New York City, but actually reside in one of the suburbs, say…Brooklyn; when someone asks you where you live, you’re going to respond, Brooklyn. That’s because you feel more connected to that smaller enclave, your community, than you do to the entire city. It’s the same with the clusters of media communities. Our customers are flocking together and we have to be there with the Welcome Wagon when then move in.

And the cushion of all of this is creativity. There must be more to us than just surface banter. We have to achieve depths and allow our customers to discover the layers one at a time. Then we give them what they really want, comfort. Choice, control and comfort are the priorities our customers are demanding today. And the sooner we realize that, the better off we’ll be.

If we take these Vitamin Cs of the new business model and swallow them down with the MVP approach: Meet and exceed the expectations of our customers – Validate for them, everything that is out there – Preview the near future so they know what to expect tomorrow – then we begin to see the effects the Cs have on our new business model. Subsequently, we have new strength and have acquired immunity to the bugs out there that threaten to put us in our sickbed.

Our cheeks are rosy and we finally have the good health we have been seeking for so long. Bring back the passion, add a dash of emotion and have the guts to let your heart lead the way, because I know there is no other way for the magazine media to thrive in this numbers-driven, statistics-shackled age. So start spreading the news, change, the right change, is the only constant in the magazine media business and both Change and Constant start with C.

h1

The Printed Magazine is Your Calling Card To A Much Bigger Business and Other Cool (and Profitable) Advice from Jonathan Rheingold, Founder and Creator of Respect and Tally HO! Magazines. The Mr. Magazine™ Interview.

February 11, 2013

Screen shot 2013-02-07 at 3.33.37 PM Hip-Hop’s hippest and most successful co-creator of urban magazines XXL, King, and many more, Jonathan Rheingold, talks about his own creations, Respect…another hip-hop feather in his urban cap, and his latest print endeavor, Tally Ho!, a total celebration of some of photography’s most inspiring artists. So prime your rhyme and sit back, Jack, with Mr. Magazine™, as he turns you on to some of the coolest advice ever given, with hip-hop’s own Jonathan Rheingold.

Jonathan Rheingold isn’t just sitting around on his laurels waiting for the golden rapper to pronounce him King of all urban legends of print. While his 22 years spent at Harris Publications was a great experience and something he will always treasure, Rheingold has moved on…with warp speed. Three years ago he launched Respect, a hip-hop offering of sophisticated photographic flair and fare. The magazine teams Rheingold, once again, with the famed urban blogger, Elliott Wilson, and together the two are proving their professional compatibility is unbeatable. And now, on the heels of the successful Respect, Rheingold has united with Phil Knott to bring the world fine art in the form of some of the most awe-inspiring photography around with Tally Ho!. Combining the artistic poignancy of Tally Ho! with the cultural kick of Respect, not to mention throwing in an entire custom-designed program for advertisers that gives them multiple platforms to target, Rheingold has hit pay dirt once again.

And as with every Mr. Magazine™ Interviews, first the sound-bites followed by the lightly edited transcript of the interview.

The Sound-bites:

On why he still believes in print: I still think it’s an extraordinarily viable platform to reach consumers. The fact is that the engagement with print, in my opinion, and I’m sure a lot of statistics would support this, is still one of the strongest areas to target consumers with premium content that they pay for.

On why creating his own custom-designed ad campaigns for his clients are the future of advertising: What drives our business is the programs that integrate all the platforms across the board that we actually customize. So when you look in Respect magazine and you see those G-Shock campaigns for Casio, our in-house agency creates all of that for them.

On why his magazine is a calling card: I get to reach my audience through all these different mediums beyond the magazine, yet I’m still doing the magazine. So the magazine is not only a calling card for advertising, and in itself it’s still a valid medium, it is a calling card to the much bigger programs that we do.

On why the term advertiser just doesn’t fit anymore: So a lot of these companies that historically, as a magazine publisher, I would have called advertisers, I now call clients. They’re clients because we help them reach an audience through many touch points. So, the traditional conversation was…let’s discuss a rate and a frequency, and then we negotiate. Now the conversations are, whether we want them to be or not, as though we’re an agency.

300x250promo And now here is the complete Mr. Magazine™ Interview, lightly edited, with Tally Ho! and Respect’s Jonathan Rheingold.

Samir Husni: I know you just celebrated your third anniversary with Respect magazine and now you’ve launched Tally Ho!, do you think there’s a future for print? Why are you introducing a new print magazine in this digital age?

Jonathan Rheingold: Well, there are a lot of good reasons. I still think it’s an extraordinarily viable platform to reach consumers. I’d have to almost take you back a little to understand. I was at Harris Publications for 22 years and I was a very loyal employee and I co-created with them, along with Dennis Page, who was my partner-in-crime and my boss for many years. We had an incredible run and co-created a lot of great magazines at the time with one of the top mediums. You know the web has definitely changed the landscape quite a bit. But the fact is that the engagement with print, in my opinion, and I’m sure a lot of statistics would support this, is still one of the strongest areas to target consumers with premium content that they pay for. To me the vitality of readers of magazines is the strongest out of any other medium because it’s a whole tactile experience. In terms of Respect, every magazine has a different story. Respect, when I launched it three years ago, happened at a time when the magazine apps were really just starting to come out. People were asking me why are you doing a print magazine and I said…well, in my years of launching all these pop culture oriented publications, I kept in contact with all these great photographers and I love their work. I have a passion for it. And honestly, outside of a gallery or a museum, I can’t think of a better place to experience fine art. But photography is a medium that I think is best-served in print, unless you’re seeing it in person.

res_13_jcole_cvr The experience is everything

My original thought process, putting the commercial viability aside for a moment, was to create a magazine that would best serve the beauty of the pictures. And to me digital falls really behind in that area. I don’t think that you could really experience the type of content we have in Respect, on a tactile level, like you could do in a print magazine. It just made perfect sense in terms of photography, stills work very well in print, and Respect, for a hip-hop magazine, as a matter of fact for any music magazine, was a whole new approach really. It was created to celebrate the best photography, and journalism. It’s all about delivering five-star, curated content. And not to knock the competition, such as XXL magazine, which is dear to me because I co-created it, but we believe when you launch a magazine you have to differentiate yourself, and again, in this digital culture we live in, I feel like if I’m going to launch a magazine and have a passion for something, it should be real.

In photography and the area of urban culture, there has never been a magazine that truly celebrated it on a really sophisticated level. Everyone had claimed to do that, but I think that not since the early incarnation of Vibe, has there been a magazine like Respect. I truly believe it’s the best hip-hop magazine there is. There’s no back-up book from an advertising standpoint, no defamatory content toward women, and we really celebrate the photography and the subjects in the magazine. To get to your main question: why do a print magazine? I think that the experience we provide is best-served in the format of a print publication. And if it’s about how do we reach people, I’m still very newsstand driven, so we do distribute Respect widely, globally, on newsstands. So our readership is a paid readership, it’s not controlled circ. We don’t give them away. You have to buy it on the newsstand. There is a qualitative aspect to that.

The key to advertising today is custom-content

The advertising space has become extraordinarily difficult in magazines, let alone in the urban market. We had a hip-hop boom and then a bubble. And that bubble broke. Companies that were legendary to the culture such as Phat Farm, Fubu, Enyce; all these companies which were born out of the culture by entrepreneurs who came from the inner cities and were able to capitalize on the culture and make a really beautiful living for themselves, a lot of those companies either don’t exist, or have become mass brands. So there is very little endemic business. And as the music business advertising has moved mostly online in an effort to close transactions just to sell songs, there’s very little advertising to garner in the urban space if you’re looking for low-hanging fruit. In other words, advertisers who are spending a tremendous amount of their marketing dollars on targeting urban readers aren’t so common in print anymore. We had this great idea with Respect in wanting it to always be culturally relevant.

I left Harris in 2009 because my advertisers wanted to have access to more media from us and bigger programs. We were very limited in terms of just merely offering print. There were companies out there like Complex Media and Cornerstone and Vice, which is also an agency with Virtue, they were all what I call the hybrid agencies that came into the business. A lot of them were born out of magazines. Complex was a magazine, Cornerstone has Fader, Virtue has Vice, Filter Media has Filter.

I see the magazine, Respect, as being a calling card to a much bigger business. I run the magazine profitably, very lean, with the best talent. It’s a self-sufficient business as I run it, but it’s definitely a calling card to a much bigger platform. We, Musinart, the parent company, have an advertising ad network. We represent approximately a dozen different sites in pop culture, ranging from music to sports to fashion. And then we also have an in-house agency where we produce a lot of custom content. Now when I get an RFP for the magazine or an RFP for the network, I’m able to bundle all of these different media together into a unified program. I do sell standard ads on the web. I sell standard ad pages in the magazine. But really, what drives our business is the programs that integrate all the platforms across the board that we actually customize. So when you look in Respect magazine and you see those G-Shock campaigns for Casio, our in-house agency creates all of that for them. We curate the talent for the programs. I identify the talent. We release them legally; everything is very, very legitimate. We shoot the content in the programs for the print advertorial. We shoot video of the subjects that we use for digital, which we then have the ability, like a creative agency, to create content, but what we do differently from a creative agency, is we then have the ability to disseminate it as well. When I shoot a video or a series for one of our clients like Casio, Hennessy, Crown Royal or K-Swiss, we’re able to take those videos and feed them across our ad network which brings the scale that a magazine does not have. And even magazines that typically have their own respective websites, they’re usually small.

Custom-content, across a variety of platforms

There’s that phenomena that I’m sure you’re familiar with, Samir. The very popular magazines that are in a particular special interest and have websites usually can’t compete with the small, independent groups of individuals that are also living that lifestyle in the digital world. Usually the random blog in hip-hop could be as large as a substantial-sized magazine that has a website. What I knew from my own experience at Harris was not to put all of my energy into digital in building my own digital platform. Instead, put the energy into the creative aspect in delivering advertisers efficiencies and programs that are very custom for them and using the audience from the magazine and the network to push out those campaigns. When you come back to G-Shock again, you have the advertorial in the magazine; you have the videos that we create that live on their platform, so Casio actually houses that content on the G-Shock site. And we use our network to push those videos and to drive traffic to our advertiser’s platforms. It takes into account the print experience, but it also has multiple touch points that really, to me, make it like the ultimate fantasy for a print publisher. I get to reach my audience through all these different mediums beyond the magazine, yet I’m still doing the magazine.

The magazine is not only a calling card for advertising, and in itself it’s still a valid medium, it is a calling card to the much bigger programs that we do. But in addition to that, the magazine still gives us the ability to garner the attention and the talent that we need to build these programs, because the talent wants to be featured in the magazine. There’s nothing like being immortalized in print to an emerging artist, or to an established talent. If you ask any major artist if they’d rather be on the cover of a magazine or on the homepage of a website, they’re going to pick the magazine, because the website, first of all, is vapor. It’s there and then it’s gone. And the magazine is like an accolade. If you’re a rapper and you’re on the cover of Respect, it’s just short of winning a Grammy. It’s a great accolade to be on the cover of XXL, Rolling Stone, Respect or Vibe.

Print has a validation that digital just doesn’t have

I think it’s that print still has that cache, that credibility factor of the journalism inside. The amount of care and time that goes into producing that product is just on a different level than creating digital content. I’m not saying that it’s better. I’m just saying that the engagement is much different, and definitely for the talent, it has far more relevance and importance to them. And it helps us with the advertisers, because the print product definitely garners talent for a campaign. The level of talent that we’re able to procure, from writers and photographers, is much greater in a magazine than it is on the web. And we’re able to leverage that, to create these really great programs.

Embracing digital, while promoting print

Musinart, just to give you background, is an integrated media company. We have an ad network where we create campaigns, recruit talent, create content, whether it’s print or digital content, and then we have the ability to disseminate it through different mediums, both magazine and digital. It’s really a one-stop, efficiency company that I designed to speak to the ever-changing print-advertising climate. My company was definitely birthed out of, what I believe, is what’s necessary to be a great print publisher in this climate. You have to embrace digital, which doesn’t mean you have to abandon print. It means you have to embrace all of it. That’s really what Musinart is about and my legacy in urban culture and co-creating and launching King and Scratch and XXL…I know you remember all the magazines we launched…Hardball and Blitz. Dennis and I were prolific for many, many years. And then the Internet changed things. Respect and my experience in urban music was really a solution, if you will, to that space of not only offering print, but a full-service program. When I talk about Casio G-Shock, we’re the only hip-hop publication that Casio advertises in. Everything we do for Casio is custom, in every issue. It’s custom. Anything with K-Swiss, Crown Royal, we did a very big program.

Once called advertisers; now called clients

A lot of these companies that historically, as a magazine publisher, I would have called advertisers, I now call clients. They’re clients because we help them reach an audience through many touch points. The traditional conversation was…let’s discuss a rate and a frequency, and then we negotiate. Now the conversations are, whether we want them to be or not, as though we’re an agency. We have agencies that contact us with RFPs that request very creative executions that are original and not cookie-cutter at all. And that requires very creative selling and access to really great talent to create those programs for them, so that’s very much what my company is about. Sometimes you’ll be looking at an issue of Respect and see that amazing ad for K-Swiss and not even realize that to get that ad and to sell that ad, I had to make it. And that’s also, I believe, what makes me scrappier than your average agency, because my form of selling, and the fact that I have to create these campaigns, are really a result of my means of selling advertising. And if I have to sell an ad and I have to create the campaign, then that’s what I’m going to do. A lot of companies are doing that now. Where we’ve set ourselves apart is that the quality of our work is exceptional. We operate like a real ad agency.

Within three years’ time, I built a very successful publication. Elliott Wilson, the most celebrated hip-hop journalist, who was named by MTV as the face of hip-hop journalism last year, is the editor of Respect, and during our heyday at XXL, he and I were the best-selling team, I was the executive publisher and he was the editor. And those were the best days of XXL, without question. So he’s onboard. And he also has a very successful rap blog and that is a separate business. Musinart actually represents Rap Radar. It’s a bit incestuous. I represent a blogger who’s the editor of my magazine. So again, when we do these programs, it makes them that much more successful because I really get the bloggers engaged in what we do. But at the end of the day, I don’t think the Musinart Company would be as successful or as unique if we didn’t produce the publications too.

Samir Husni: We are living in this Transcended Infinite Media age where it’s more of a tangled web, and it seems like you are in every string of that web. Is this the future?

Jonathan Rheingold: I believe it is. You know, magazines, hopefully not in our lifetimes, may become extinct, but the future now is really about integration. I don’t believe that magazines are going anywhere, and I don’t think they’re exactly analogous to vinyl and to music, because without question, it’s a particular type of physical experience that just can’t be replicated digitally. I think it’s more analogous with the movies. You know everyone thought that with the advent of streaming video and film, that ticket sales at movie theaters would be dead. And movies are still breaking records. That’s because people still want to go to the movies. You can’t replicate that at home.

Samir Husni: Do you find that it’s easy to replicate with Tally Ho! what you did with Respect?

Screen Shot 2013-02-10 at 8.32.15 PMJonathan Rheingold: Tally Ho! was an utter and total rite of passage from Respect. Phil Knott was a photographer that I interfaced with on Respect, his work stood out to me. If you read my letter, there’s a short story of how we came together. We got together and he had this really crude newspaper that he had done in 2006 that was kind of slapped together. And I thought it had great promise. I just loved the concept of a print publication being a gallery of sorts, and to work, being a type of visual creation; it really would be best-served in print. And so Phil had shown me this newspaper, it was a little cruddy, but the concept was cool, and I said if I put a team together and package the real publication with you, I think we could do something really different.

Swimming against the current
As a matter of fact, where everything seems to be continually going digital, my company is the audacious organization. Where people are getting away from print, I’m here to launch, but I’m only going to launch ideas that I feel would conceptually work better in print. And to me, like photography, which is a form of fine art, paintings, illustrations, design, including photography, is best-served in print, unless you’re going to go look at it in a museum or a gallery, not online. I think being able to search for information and having a knowledge-base of what’s at your disposal on the Internet, is extraordinary, and a must-have resource for discovering art, music, and photography, but in terms of actually experiencing it, I think it’s best-served in an actual publication.

Making Tally Ho! a reality

So with Tally Ho! Phil showed me this idea. I told him that I was going to put together a team of editors, which he really didn’t have. At the time he just had a bunch of pictures, which reminded me of Antenna. What I really loved about Antenna was we were able to create a comprehensive bible to product, and I felt like what Antenna was to product, Tally Ho! would be to fine art. We would create a very easy navigation for people to experience work by fine artists, and also to learn who these people were in a very short-form format that would open their eyes to art; so if they were purveyors of art, they would respect it and appreciate it, and want to, obviously, engage in it. And if they were novices, they would feel like they could immerse themselves in it and learn from it. And so, I think Tally Ho!, unlike Respect, is not a commercial play, it’s much more curated and smaller. We’re available in 125 different galleries globally. We’re in all the major, finer bookstores, Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, and then we’re in specialty shops, such as Colette in Paris. And ranging from Kidrobot to Colette, we’re really walking that line between the early adopter, curators of pop culture, and individuals that actually really love and collect fine art.

And what Phil is doing that’s different is, he’s created his own fine art, broadening the definition of artistry which includes design. And to some degree, even music is a theme that’s incorporated into it, not as a music magazine, but as in capturing celebrities from music in different ways. So Natalia Kills, is the cover, and on the flip side is David Bowie. But the reality is that the David Bowie piece is really about Mick Rock, who’s a legendary rock photographer, who captured the 70s. And Natalia is, if you look at the feature, a really Avant-garde photo essay that was shot by Phil himself.

It’s Phil Knott’s Tally Ho! Phil is a curator, who also incorporates his own work. I mean, he doesn’t purport to be Andy Warhol at all; it’s not like Andy Warhol’s interview. He’s really not an egotist. It’s just really about his world and all these great people he knew. So I underwrote it, and we created a very unique partnership between the two of us. And we got three underwriters. I remember with Respect, I got a single sponsor to keep it simple. And with Tally Ho! we were very cognizant about concentrating on getting a few companies that really understood the cultural value of the publication to underwrite the first issue so that we could really get it out the door and not be dependent on multiple advertisers. And so again, Musinart, integrated hybrid agency, integrated Media Company; there are many things that you can call it, but we’re still a magazine publisher. And in the last three years for a small publisher to turn out two publications…Respect, by the way, is now bi-monthly, so we actually went up in frequency from 4 to 6, where magazines like XXL have gone from 9 to 6.

Samir Husni: Jonathan, what do you call yourself? I see your title in the magazine is publisher, but what are you really?

Jonathan Rheingold: That’s a great question, Samir. You know, I consider myself a publisher whether it’s digital or print. When you hear publisher, that may be more synonymous with magazines. When you think video, you think producer. When I was at Harris, I was very creative and I was executive publisher. At Musinart, at times, I’m like the creative director and I’m also the publisher. Because all the selling, all the content, anything we create, it has to have advertising, sponsorship, and consumers in mind. Those things don’t always work in tandem together. I almost want to reserve the right to send you an e-mail and have time to think about that question, because I think being quoted as calling myself a publisher may make me sound like I’m antiquated, but I really think it does speak to the multi-faceted aspect of selling and creating. You know, I’m not a rep. I’m not repping other people’s magazines. I create the magazine, Musinart owns the magazine, so we’re creating content, and we’re selling advertising. I’m enlisting all these great talents who create, shoot, and write for us. I’m as much of a director as Spielberg, not to put myself on the same pedestal with the man, but I’m really, from concept to creation, immersed in the entire concept like I’ve never been before. And that’s necessary. I really have to think about it. It’s a great question that I struggle with. Sometimes I struggle with what to call my company, but I feel very comfortable saying it’s an integrated media company. At the end of the day, that’s what we do. I would say I’m an integrated publisher.

Samir Husni: My last question: what keeps Jonathan up at night?

Jonathan Rheingold: I love to find solutions to my clients’ problems, challenges, and/or goals. That’s what I live by. I love coming up with solutions. I love completion. And just knowing that I’m making a difference and able to provide these efficiencies for companies that need to reach a particular audience and don’t necessarily have the budgets they used to have to do it. And I’m still able to create efficiency for them. But I think solving problems and creating campaigns based on my clients’ needs is extraordinarily gratifying. I am a sales person at heart, but to be a great salesperson in any medium, whether television, radio, various facets of digital, or print; you have to be creative. And I don’t mean creative as only having great ideas; I mean creative where you have to be extraordinarily consultative, and a lot of my sales calls and sales meetings, and even the RFPs we get, are highly consultative. It’s going way beyond, “Hey, what can you sell us?” to “Hey, what can you create for us?” The whole thing that keeps me up at night is retaining the ability to create these things and come up with solutions. That’s what makes it all very gratifying.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

Mr. Magazine™ Musings: All Good Print Magazines Go to Digital Heaven… Or Do They?

January 24, 2013

300x250promo When a publication decides its earthly existence as a print life form is no longer a viable option and instead takes on a digital-only presence, is it really a heaven-sent opportunity or is it actually a gentle nudge by the minions of magazine hell to push it into its final resting place? If your print product isn’t connecting with an audience, is it really going to flourish among a billion more nondescript URLs or a million other apps?

Think about it, please. And take a look at a few lost souls while you’re at it.

Flashback 2006

When Teen People closed its print magazine in 2006, it decided to make digital confetti out of the pages and toss the remnants on the print product’s grave in celebration. With a still healthy circulation of 1.5 million in the second half of 2005, Teen People displaced about 50 employees—with the promise of finding them spots within the company—and, according to Ann Moore and John Huey, set about to “invest in the brand through Teenpeople.com, which shows promise and growth.”

Flash Forward 2013

The only presence that remains of Teenpeople.com today is at the home of the magazine’s parents: PeopleMagazine.com. Apparently, when living on its own didn’t quite pan out, mommy and daddy allowed their child to come home.

Too bad some of the other print magazines that went digital-only didn’t have parents quite so affluent.

Going digital-only screams salvation to some print products that are battling low ad pages and declining circulation, but the question remains: If you’re not selling ads in your ink-on-paper magazine, what in the world makes you think you’re going to make gazillions of dollars on the web?

Even with automated ad sales systems, consumer magazine sites aren’t garnering all that much from their digital counterparts.

Flashback 2009

Gourmet in print became another headstone in the “Ink-on-Paper Cemetery,” when Condè Nast killed it in 2009. Just the previous year, Gourmet had had a circulation of around one million, but its ad pages had dropped. And the magazine wasn’t doing as well as its sister magazine, Bon Appétit, which was also owned by Condè Nast. But it would soon be reborn as an app for iPad called Gourmet Live.

Flash Forward 2013

Gourmet Live is officially done, as far as any new content is concerned. According to a spokesperson for Condè Nast, the app itself will remain intact, but it won’t be updated. However, Gourmet.com will continue to be updated as the main platform of the brand.

Where have we heard that before?

Flashback 2011

American Media, Inc. (AMI), a leading publisher of celebrity magazines, announced the launch of Reality Weekly, the first magazine devoted only to Reality TV shows and its new mega-stars. Included in the hype around this blockbuster idea was the companion website for folks who just couldn’t get enough of the inside info that must surely abound on television shows such as these.

The launch was fan-fared with the fact that the magazine would sell at all the mass merchant locations: Wal-Mart, Kroger, Dollar General, Kmart, A&P and Rite-Aid and would be priced a mere $1.79 (“Less Money, More Fun”). Really.

“I’m proud to introduce a magazine that gives readers the news they want about television’s most popular genre. Print remains one of our most effective mediums, which is why Reality Weekly will be a showcase launch of 2012,” said David J. Pecker, AMI’s Chairman, President and CEO, at the time.

Flash Forward 2013

Before 2012 was over, the magazine folded. The website hasn’t been updated since July 2012. However, that same month AMI folded the magazine, it announced that it was naming Joe Bilman as its first chief digital officer and set the lofty goal (at the time Mr. Bilman was hired) of building its digital revenue to $50 million. Accordingly, AMI resolved to try Reality Weekly as a free tablet app that summer.

They followed that with a big splashy ad that screamed at the consumer: “Reality Weekly…We’re Going Digital.”

But where are they now?

The magazines mentioned here are not the only ones. What about Elle Girl, Cosmo Girl? Digital brands such as PC Mag and Sporting News, while still breathing that oh-so thin digital air, are mere shadows of their former print selves.

When you lose contact with the people who matter, your customers, and treat them as numbers instead of members of this community of experiences you have created for them, you’re going to lose them, whether the neighborhood is print or digital.

And what about Newsweek?

As the New York Times put it so eloquently: From the start, it was an unwieldy melding of two newsrooms: a legacy print magazine, Newsweek, combined with an irreverent digital news site, The Daily Beast.

Now the 79-year-old, once highly-respected news magazine must co-exist next to an entity called “The Daily Beast,” its new significant other.

The sacred vow that some publications make with their new life partner, digital, is usually a last-ditch effort to save a customer and product bond that was broken many times earlier. When you have a brand so highly known in print and you suddenly jerk that trusted and cherished product out from under your customers’ feet, why do you bemoan your fate when, one day, you have to take that digital shingle down for good?

Right now, Newsweek is looking for digital heaven, as others are. Let’s just hope the abyss that lies before them doesn’t lead to purgatory instead.

The Moral of the Story?

At the end of the day if we don’t create a community where we make our customers feel like members instead of just numbers after a dollar sign, we won’t have anything to publish in print or digital—no long-lasting relationship, anyway, merely a one-night stand.

The minute you lose your connectivity with your customers (readers, users, viewers, listeners, whatever you call them), you’re in trouble. And if you fail to connect with them time and time again, even going to that digital heaven online can’t save you. Cut your losses, let your magazine die in peace and don’t torture it anymore.

Stop being in the game of numbers and change to a game of members instead.

Author’s Note: This column appeared on the Folio magazine blog on Jan. 22, 2013.

h1

There is Nothing Bobo about “Anikibo.” Using Digital to Bring a “Print Revival.” The Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Anikibo Founder Deborah Causton

January 22, 2013

Picture 1“Anikibo is the first peer-to-peer online marketplace specifically for independent publishers making, creating and
publishing beautiful physical magazines, zines & comics. As a curated e-commerce platform it enables publishers
to sell direct to customers via a one check-out process…” so starts the press release announcing this new e-commerce venture using digital to sell print.

The brainchild of Deborah Causton, Anikibo was born of her passion for the printed word “and the frustration of not being able to bring home everything of newly discovered materials from trips abroad. Spending the last 10 years building websites it was time to merge the two avenues of her creative and digital life.”

Intrigued by the concept of both using digital to sell print and the idea of a “print revival” led to this Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Deborah Causton, the founder and creator of Anikibo. Anikibo’s Facebook page, all magazines sold on Anikibo are selected for producing products which are deemed to be unique, clever, beautiful, and creative and have an absolute passion for paper!

Have you ever heard anything more beautiful? Anikibo’s creator, Deborah Causton, believes there is a resurgence emerging with the printed product (of which, I agree…if I ever thought there was an extinction on the horizon for print at all), but the fact remains, the naysayers out there certainly did. Maybe the birth of Anikibo will once and for all show the killjoys of print what most of us have known all along: While you’re scrolling and squinting, the rest of the world is enjoying turning pages…ink on paper pages!

So, sit back and enjoy my recent interview with a delightful lady who is using digital to support print in a unique and innovative way!

The Sound-bites:

On the definition of the phrase “print revival”: Ultimately, I guess it would just be nice to see the print industry bathed in positive headlines again. It’s a digital age for sure, but like you said “…it took 500 years to build up this tradition. You don’t just throw up the white flag and say, ‘OK, everything is digital now.’ ”

On plans to promote Anikibo and the story behind the name: Someone told me once when launching a website that a 20/80 rule applied: 20% website / 80% marketing. As for the name, it came from a nightclub in Luxembourg, where I used to live.

On whether or not there is going to be a print product, or just a digital platform to sell print: There are so many technological avenues to be explored – this will be my primary focus. As to whether I’ll actually print something from it, maybe eventually, but probably a magazine!

DeborahCaustonAnd now here is the Mr. Magazine™ Interview; in typical Mr. Magazine™ Interview lightly edited style, with Deborah Causton of Anikibo.

Samir Husni: You used the phrase “print revival” in your press release, how would you define the meaning of this phrase?

Deborah Causton: Ultimately, I guess it would just be nice to see the print industry bathed in positive headlines again.

It’s a digital age for sure, but like you said “…it took 500 years to build up this tradition. You don’t just throw up the white flag and say, ‘OK, everything is digital now.’ ” I own the digital suite: smart phone, tablet, laptop, smart TV – but they’re all just practical objects that basically facilitate the delivery of digital content. I don’t really treasure them or the content on them; I replace them with the next model, watch the next episode, read the next item.

We all got excited by the new stuff, but we don’t love it in the same way. That’s why we’re seeing resurgence in the popularity of vinyl. There’s a strong sense of nostalgia from the emotional connection we got from physical objects like magazines, records, books and zines, especially those that represent a passion – we won’t let that go so easily. In my opinion, this is the driving force behind the coming print revival.

Unfortunately, I don’t think vinyl will manage to avoid becoming obsolete, mostly because of the cumbersome technology required to play vinyl records. Magazines don’t face this limitation. They can and have embraced the technologies available to them. We still have plenty of time before somebody pulls the plug on the production of paper.

Samir Husni: What are your plans to promote Anikibo (and what is the story behind the name)?

Deborah Causton: Someone told me once when launching a website that a 20/80 rule applied: 20% website / 80% marketing. Working almost completely independently, I’m sure I will face some challenges in the promotion – a lot of trial and error no doubt.

The formulation of this project began as far back as 2007, but the timing feels right now somehow. I just have to protect my investment and announce to as many people as I can reach, leveraging myself from the positive reactions I receive. I’m of course greatly thankful to the magazines and zines that have decided to stock thus far. It’s very encouraging to get this support having come somewhat out of nowhere.

As for the name, it came from a nightclub in Luxembourg, where I used to live. It was called Anikibobo, but I learned that “bobo” means silly or stupid in Portuguese so I opted to drop the second “bo”.

Samir Husni: You are based in Berlin, Anikibo is a British company, and you are dealing with publications from 7 countries… tell me your story…

Deborah Causton: I’ve been somewhat of a transient person. I’m British, but only by birth. I’ve found many other places that have become home. Currently Berlin is that place. My ambition for Anikibo was that it would always be an international platform. It is in some ways a selfish development since I wanted easier access to magazines and zines I’d find when travelling, but never had the space in my suitcase to bring back with me.

The only reason for incorporating the business in the UK is the ease with which it can be done.

Samir Husni: Is it passion that drives you or a business plan?

Deborah Causton: I’m not sure if I should admit publicly that I don’t actually have a business plan per se, but then it looks like I just did! Ideas on the other hand – ten to the dozen! My initial plan for an online marketplace goes back as far as 2001. I’d traipse up to Portobello Market in London with a friend who was selling handmade bags and scarfs. We’d be standing there at 3am on a Sunday morning queuing for a good stall, freezing cold, with a questionable cup of coffee in hand. It occurred to me then that the internet would be the perfect place for all these independent designers to get together and sell their stuff. I should have got my act together then: 4 years later Etsy was launched. Luckily, there are plenty of independent niches that haven’t been organized yet. I’ve been toying with this current incarnation of Anikibo since Colophon (Luxembourg’s Magazine Symposium).

Samir Husni: Are you planning to produce a print product to help sell the publications? Or it is going to be only a digital platform to sell print?

Deborah Causton: I studied graphic design, but have been very involved in tech for the last 12 years. One of the things that excite me most about this project is that I can combine my two passions. There are so many technological avenues to be explored – this will be my primary focus. As to whether I’ll actually print something from it, maybe eventually, but probably a magazine!

Samir Husni: Any other thing you would like to add…. such as will you be mailing publications overseas, adding countries, etc…

Deborah Causton: The platform has already been set up to enable worldwide distribution. Any publisher from around the world is invited to stock at Anikibo, providing they meet the minimum criteria: they love to make!

Samir Husni: Thank you. Check Anikibo for yourself at www.anikibo.com
300x250promo

h1

“How to Make a MAGAZINE”: A Kid’s Guide and a Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Its Creators’ AppleSeeds™ Magazine Editors

January 16, 2013

Picture 76So you want to start a magazine? Believe it or not, even in a digital age, starting a magazine was, is and will continue to be a dream come true to many people of all ages. It is the first of three Fs that I believe every magazine person enjoys: Fun. A lot of fun. And, by the way if you want to know the other two Fs, here we go: Fame and Fortune.

I fell in love with magazines at age 9 and I started my first magazine at age 11 or so. When the folks at AppleSeeds magazine asked me if I would be interested in being the consulting editor for their upcoming special issue on How to Make a Magazine, needless to say I jumped at the opportunity. The magazine, now in its 15th year of publishing, is getting ready to release its special issue on magazine making, answering the many requests of its readers who “Want to know how we do it?” The February issue of the magazine will start mailing this week.

Once the magazine was put to bed, I reached out to Lou Waryncia, Editorial Director and Susan Buckley, Editor and asked them a few questions about the thinking behind doing a special issue of a children’s magazine on launching a magazine and about the future of printed magazines for kids in this digital age.

Picture 78Here is the Mr. Magazine™ Interview, in typical Mr. Magazine™ Interview lightly edited style, with Mr. Waryncia and Ms. Buckley:

Samir Husni: Myth has it that kids don’t read anymore and yet you publish several kids magazines. What gives? Do you know something folks don’t know?

Lou Waryncia: Kids do read….you just have to give them something that inspires them. And that’s what we try to do with all our various magazines. Our speciality is quality children’s content. We have a magazine for almost every interest. And we try to make it all fun, accessible, yet educational.

Susan Buckley: We think kids especially like a magazine format with high interest articles about subjects that THEY like. Short articles are fun for kids–just enough information to tickle them into finding out more!

Samir Husni: Not only do you publish kids’ magazines, but you are publishing a special issue of Appleseeds on starting magazines, why?

Lou Waryncia: Our readers gave us the idea. One question we get over and over from kids is “How do you put a magazine together?” We answered that question by creating a whole magazine issue about magazines. We wanted to show kids all the many components of putting together a magazine—-the research, writing, editing, art, photography—the whole creative process. AppleSeeds’ tag line is “Explore Your World,” and we think the magazine topic will let kids explore all the most fascinating aspects of creating a publication and the communication process.

Susan Buckley: We also knew this would be an opportunity to highlight the real people who make AppleSeeds happen every month, hoping that our readers will identify all of us as real people who have interesting jobs! We are especially delighted with the AppleSeeds Kids every month and wanted to highlight them and their talented creator, Annette Cate.


Samir Husni: What is the future of the printed word in this digital age?

Lou Waryncia: We believe in print. We believe in digital. AppleSeeds is available in both formats. We’re leaving it up to the reader to determine his or her format choice. Ultimately, we hope both formats will co-exist and provide us with a broader readership.

Susan Buckley: Lou says it all.


Samir Husni: What are YOUR plans for the future? Do you see a day where all the kids magazines will be digital only?

Lou Waryncia: AppleSeeds just launched a PDF digital edition. A more interactive digital edition will launch later this year. It’s too early to tell how the digital versions will be received. There is interest in both formats. Right now, I don’t see a digital-only publication such as AppleSeeds.

Susan Buckley: I love reading on my tablet, but I’m a real print person, so I hope we always have AppleSeeds in both digital and print.

Samir Husni: Any additional comments you would like to add….

Picture 80Susan Buckley: We hope this edition of AppleSeeds will be incredibly popular so that it will inspire our readers to create their own magazines–hoping they have as much fun doing it as we do! Thanks for your invaluable help, Mr. Magazine!

Samir Husni: Thank you.

To get your own copy of AppleSeeds, click here.

h1

TIME’s Rick Stengel to Samir Husni: That’s Why President Obama is TIME’s Person of Year and That’s Why We Will Always Have Paper…

December 19, 2012

POY12 President Barack Obama is TIME’s Person of the Year 2012. That is no longer a secret anymore. However, one may ask, with the current status of print and digital, “would TIME magazine have as much an impact if it was published in a digital form only? Luckily, we’ll never have to find out. According to managing editor – Rick Stengel – print isn’t going anywhere.

In an audio interview with Samir “Mr. Magazine™” Husni, Rick Stengel, TIME’s managing editor reveals the reasons behind picking President Obama as the Person of the Year and how this choice today is different than that of 2008. Stengel also shares his views on the future of paper, the reasons behind changing the color of the trademarked red border of TIME and the importance of the brand as the center of everything they do and produce at TIME.

In typical Mr. Magazine™ Interview’s style, first the sound bites, followed by the audio interview, and then the very lightly edited transcript with Rick Stengel.

The Sound-bites:

On how easy it was to choose President Obama as Person of the Year: Well, it’s never an easy decision and in some ways the thing that makes it a hard decision is you can always choose the president of the United States.

On why Obama was chosen: We chose him because, if you look back at 2008 when he was Person of the Year, a lot of people thought, ‘Boy, this is a once-in-a-lifetime change, it’s an anomaly, it’s lightening in a bottle,’ as he called it, and what I think we saw this year was readifying the changes in America.

On the cover photo: We wanted to show him in a way that he hasn’t been shown before.

On whether or not a “digital-only” Person of the Year would generate as much of an impact as print does: Well, I think you know, Samir, that I think the paper product will never go away.

On changing the color of TIME’s border for this issue: The issue is special and it makes it feel even more commemorative than it is, and I just thought it was a great and interesting way to go and I hope it’s successful.

And now for the audio interview:

And now for the lightly edited transcript from the interview with Rick Stengel, managing editor, TIME.

Samir Husni: My first question to you is how easy was it to choose the president as the “Person of the Year,” on a scale of 1 to 10?

Rick Stengel: Are you comparing it to other choices for “Person of the Year,” or just a relative scale of easy versus a hard decision?

Samir Husni: As easy versus a hard decision.

Rick Stengel: Well, it’s never an easy decision and in some ways the thing that makes it a hard decision is you can always choose the president of the United States; you can almost always choose the president of the United States during an election year, but I thought that he was really on to something that was new and different and we can talk about that in a second, and it was a relatively hard decision. I’d say it was an 8. How about that?

Samir Husni: Okay. So, why did you choose him?

Rick Stengel: We chose him because, if you look back at 2008 when he was “Person of the Year,” a lot of people thought, ‘Boy, this is a once-in-a-lifetime change, it’s an anomaly, it’s lightening in a bottle,’ as he called it, and what I think we saw this year was readifying the changes in America. Because what he really is, is this architect of a New America, and what I mean by that is if you look the so-called coalition of the ascended: the people who voted for Obama, minorities, Hispanics, millennial, college-educated women, these groups are the groups that are making America now and making the next America. He is their symbol and their champion, and in some ways, the creator of these groups as political coalitions in America. And so, in many ways I kept wanting to call it Barack Obama is the “Person of the Year” and Barack Obama and the making of the New America. That to me is why he was “Person of the Year,” and I think everything we have seen since the election and with Hurricane Sandy and the dreadful, dreadful events in Newtown, Connecticut, we see him stepping up in a way didn’t always see in the first term. He’s more confident, he’s speaking with more clarity, speaking more from the heart about the things he really believes in, and I think that’s what people were waiting for, and in so far as “Person of the Year” it looks both backward and forward. He’s going to be around for a long time. He’s creating this New America and this new coalition and this new realignment in our political sector and that will have repercussions for decades to come.

Samir Husni: Why the picture? One of my colleagues commented that the president looks like a Roman senator on an old coin?

Rick Stengel: That’s not a bad analogy. We wanted to show him in a way that he hasn’t been shown before. Look, he’s probably the most photographed man in the universe. And we got Nadav Kander, who is a U.K. based photographer, who actually did our Mohamed Morsi cover from a few weeks ago, because A – you don’t have much time with the president and B – I wanted an image that didn’t look like anything else, and that looked special. And I think the tone of it reflects the tone of the country now, particularly the tone post-Sandy and post-Newtown. He looks determined and deliberate. It’s a quiet image. And I think that it will become one of the iconic images of President Obama for all time.

Samir Husni: Since you mentioned the word iconic, do you think the print component of TIME’s Person of the Year, or any other iconic issue that you produce; would it generate the same buzz and have the same impact if it was only digital?

Rick Stengel: Well, I think you know, Samir, that I think the paper product will never go away. I think it simply becomes a more premium, more lux, even more desirable, more expensive product that is part of this total brand of Time, so that for a digital subscription, you might also get a paper subscription, for a higher price, that is. Again, I just don’t think that print is going away, particularly for upscale publications that people like to have on their coffee tables, like to have in their homes and like to be able to carry with them. As you know, a magazine is more portable than an iPad. So, I think everything we do revolves around the brand at the center, and one of the spokes of the wheel is the print product, like the iPad product, like Time.com, like what we do for mobile, what we do for phones and you can have just one, or you can have them all and there is a subscription price that would include everything, and there’s a subscription price that would include one thing. So, that’s a very long answer to your question, because I think it’s a kind of false choice in a way, because I don’t think the physical magazine itself will ever go away.

Samir Husni: Having said that, I’ve noticed that this is the fourth time in the history of TIME magazine that they’ve changed the color of the border from red to silver?

Rick Stengel: We’ve changed it a few times and part of it had to do with when we looked at Nadav’s picture, it looked even more beautiful and special in a silver border with a silver logo. And also this is the first time in an issue that we have four subsequent internal covers that have the traditional red border and red logo, that it just made the whole thing feel special and “Person of the Year” is special. The issue is special and it makes it feel even more commemorative than it is, and I just thought it was a great and interesting way to go and I hope it’s successful.

Samir Husni: One final question, on the lighter aspect, what did you think of Mad Magazine choosing Tina Brown as the Person of the Year in their parody issue?

Rick Stengel: Well, that’s the first I’ve heard of it, Samir, to tell you the truth. I don’t know anything about that.

Samir Husni: Thank you.