Archive for the ‘Magazine Power’ Category

h1

Rachael Ray Every Day’s New Editor In Chief, Lauren Iannotti, To Samir “Mr. Magazine™” Husni: “My Goal Is To Elevate All Of Our Numbers, Get All Of Our Numbers Up Without Neglecting The Care And Feeding Of Our Beautiful Print Magazine.” The Mr. Magazine™ Interview…

October 10, 2017

“We’ll still always delight in producing the print magazine. I want to bring the print magazine’s voice into 2018 feeling modern and cool, and very much like Rachael. She’s a cool woman and she’s doing lots of awesome stuff, and I want to make sure that we’re representing that well in the magazine.” Lauren Iannotti…

Rachael Ray Every Day has been offering its readers delicious recipes, home and décor advice, travel tips, beauty and fashion trends, and shopping tricks that are aimed at saving its audience time and money since its launch in 2005. Today, the magazine is owned by Meredith and has a planned new aesthetic, one which will take it modernly into 2018 and beyond. There’s also a new captain at the helm just in time to lead the redesign and to put her own stamp onto the already winning brand. Of course, Lauren Iannotti is no stranger to the brand, having served as executive editor for the magazine for over a year now.

I spoke with Lauren recently and we talked about her new role as editor in chief/content director of the Rachael Ray brand, including the print and digital platforms. While Lauren learns to juggle and balance her new responsibilities with the magazine, which has a rate base of 1.7 million, she says that she is more than up for the challenge and defines her leadership modus operandi as a “hustler,” but she is also a visionary with very definite plans for the brand’s future, such as expanding its social footprint and its audience. And with the budding relationship she is forming with its namesake, and the respect and genuine admiration she feels for Rachael Ray, the two women together should be unstoppable. Having a successful company like Meredith behind them both can’t hurt either. Rachel Ray Every Day is apt to reach new heights, or more importantly, new audiences.

And now the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Lauren Iannotti, editor in chief/content director, Rachael Ray Every Day.

But first the sound-bites:

On whether she feels overwhelmed by the added responsibilities that come with being named editor in chief: I’m not overwhelmed at all. Maybe overwhelmed a bit by the schedule, I’ll admit, but not overwhelmed by the work. It’s what I’ve been doing for 20 years in different ways, and so my aim is true when it comes to the actual content. At the very beginning when it was happening, because it was somewhat unexpected, it was a bit daunting. But then when I started doing it, very happily, my predecessor looped me in on so much of what she was doing that I was very much involved in a lot of the decision-making and the redesign that we were working on.

On whether she has felt any internal competition between the editors and chief at Meredith since there is an abundance of big titles under their umbrella: It’s so funny that you’d ask that; what I have felt is incredible support. It’s almost weird. As soon as the transition began, I started to hear from folks all over the company. I’m actually friends with some of the editors in chief here already, so they were reaching out to offer their help with whatever I might need. Whenever you work at a big company, every company kind of has its own unique culture. We have our quirks and our ways and navigating that has been so much easier than it might have been, thanks to the support of all of these other editors.

On how, in this day and age, she can be print proud and digital smart: Print proud and digital smart, that’s interesting. And we’re still quite a print-forward brand. My goal is to elevate all of our numbers, get all of our numbers up without neglecting the care and feeding of our beautiful print magazine. I think social is going to be a very big focus for us and for me, and video, I’m not breaking any ground there, all magazines want to be doing a lot of digital video.

On who she is doing what she does as editor in chief for: herself, the publisher, the reader: I’m doing this for the reader. What I’ve always loved about working in magazines, working in the media, working for these content brands, is that we’re improving people’s lives. We entertain and inform them; we’re giving them something that is quality, and I think, especially in this day and age when they’re seeing a lot of gunk, they still know that there are certain brands that mean quality. We’re one of them; Meredith makes high-quality brands.

On how the editor in chief role plays out when you’re in that position at a celebrity-driven title: It’s totally a two-way street. Rachael is really receptive. I have been getting to know her personally over the last month, because I didn’t have tons of interaction with her when I was executive editor. And she’s super-supportive and bursting with ideas, so it definitely goes both ways. We talk regularly and we text a lot. We email a lot too. Whatever communication works best for what we’re trying to accomplish. And we also have in-person meetings a lot.

On what someone would find her doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at her home: You would probably find me rolling on the floor with a ten year old and a two year old. There’s probably a glass of wine somewhere, but we can’t keep it too close because it would spill on the carpet. My schedule has really prevented me from doing it, but let’s say it’s on the weekend, you would find me in the kitchen, definitely drinking a glass of wine, and cooking something, usually pasta, for my family when I can. So, it’s the kids and the food.

On what she would have tattooed upon her brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about her: She’s good at what she does, and she’s good to people. Kindness and excellence are what I try to go for always.

On what keeps her up at night: I can tell you what doesn’t keep me up. I’m not worried about content. I think people still seek out great content, so these legacy brands will be fine as long as they keep doing the great work that people expect from them. What keeps me up at night could be anything from climate change to what’s happening in Myanmar to what’s happening in this country. It could be a hurricane or it could be a mass shooting, one of the several that happens every day in this country. I think there is plenty out there in the world to worry about and it doesn’t go away, and Facebook is constantly reminding me of that.

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Lauren Iannotti, editor in chief, Rachael Ray Every Day.

Samir Husni: This is your first editor in chief position; you’ve been an executive editor at both Rachael Ray and at Brides, but now you’re in charge of a 1.7 million circulation magazine, probably with about five million readers, and you also have a celebrity’s name attached to the magazine; how does all of this feel? Are you overwhelmed or do you feel right at home?

Lauren Iannotti: I’m not overwhelmed at all. Maybe overwhelmed a bit by the schedule, I’ll admit, but not overwhelmed by the work. It’s what I’ve been doing for 20 years in different ways, and so my aim is true when it comes to the actual content. But yes, the juggling of responsibilities; the suddenly going from having one boss to five or six now (Laughs)…But it’s what I love to do and really exciting, and it’s fun.

At the very beginning when it was happening, because it was somewhat unexpected, it was a bit daunting. But then when I started doing it, very happily, my predecessor looped me in on so much of what she was doing that I was very much involved in a lot of the decision-making and the redesign that we were working on. So, in a sense, it was just keeping on doing what I had been doing when it came to the content. All of the corporate stuff, I’m learning, and that’s the part that’s slightly daunting.

As far as working with a celebrity, I’m extremely fortunate that I get to work with the coolest personality in the world, basically. Every time I talk to her, we find more common ground and more similarities between us. And I like what she’s about. I’ve had a blast for the last year or so working here and the more I’ve come to know the brand and to understand our namesake, the more gleeful I am that I get to do this for a living.

Samir Husni: You’re surrounded at Meredith with big titles and namesake titles; do you feel any internal competition between the editors in chief?

Lauren Iannotti: It’s so funny that you’d ask that; what I have felt is incredible support. It’s almost weird. As soon as the transition began, I started to hear from folks all over the company. I’m actually friends with some of the editors in chief here already, so they were reaching out to offer their help with whatever I might need. Whenever you work at a big company, every company kind of has its own unique culture. We have our quirks and our ways and navigating that has been so much easier than it might have been, thanks to the support of all of these other editors.

We have some editors like Cheryl Brown, who stepped up recently and has just gone through what I am going through, the learning curve stuff. Other editors that I’ve known for years, like Elizabeth Graves at Martha Stewart Living, they’re friends and offer just great support. The you have Liz Vaccariello, who’s running this massive Parents brand and offering resources. We’ve had some open head counts, so I’ve been trying to hire people at the same time, and Liz has been asking what I need and loaning us photo researchers and others.

And on the corporate level, they wanted this to work out; they wanted to support me and make this work, and I have felt that. It’s a win-win for everybody if I can step up and keep this brand great and make it even better. But I do feel intense support from the other editors and the company to take this role and succeed with it. I feel that they all really want me to succeed.

And I love it. I’m having so much fun. What we do is such a joy, and it’s a very changed landscape obviously, and there are different pressures. There is a lot more juggling, and being an editor in chief is different than it used to be. It’s no longer saying that you’ve arrived, put your feet up, hire some people, take some lunches, and have a good time. Not that it was ever that easy, but it’s definitely a lot more of a hustle. And I’m good for that. That’s my game.

Samir Husni: As a hustler, you’re overseeing the print edition and the digital; in this day and age, how can you be print proud and digital smart?

Lauren Iannotti: Print proud and digital smart, that’s interesting. And we’re still quite a print-forward brand. My goal is to elevate all of our numbers, get all of our numbers up without neglecting the care and feeding of our beautiful print magazine. I think social is going to be a very big focus for us and for me, and video, I’m not breaking any ground there, all magazines want to be doing a lot of digital video.

Everyone in the industry is feeling these challenges. I am, again, psyched to feel the tap of wisdom from my peers and of this corporation, and that has been navigating the challenges and opportunities of the industry really well. And leading the way with their sound decisions, so I’m certainly going to be taking their lead. But my goal is to definitely push hard into social, in ways that we haven’t yet. Although, we do have very respectable numbers on social; I just want to get them up even higher. And to be where our readers are seeking us; make sure that we’re on the platforms where they look for us on, or our kind of content on, so we can serve them where they’re looking for us and where they need us.

But we’ll still always delight in producing the print magazine. I want to bring the print magazine’s voice into 2018 feeling modern and cool, and very much like Rachael. She’s a cool woman and she’s doing lots of awesome stuff, and I want to make sure that we’re representing that well in the magazine. And I want to maintain our very strong audience, but I also want to gain new audiences as well, those who may not be aware of all of the cool and interesting things Rachael has been up to.

Samir Husni: You mentioned that you have five bosses now (Laughs), but who do you consider your number one boss?

Lauren Iannotti: (Laughs) That was a bit of hyperbole; technically, I do have only one boss; I report to our publisher.

Samir Husni: True, but when you get up in the morning and look in the mirror before heading out, maybe you tell yourself, I’m doing this for…is it the publisher; the reader; is it for yourself?

Lauren Iannotti: I’m doing this for the reader. What I’ve always loved about working in magazines, working in the media, working for these content brands, is that we’re improving people’s lives. We entertain and inform them; we’re giving them something that is quality, and I think, especially in this day and age when they’re seeing a lot of gunk, they still know that there are certain brands that mean quality. We’re one of them; Meredith makes high-quality brands. With all the noise out there, we make good stuff. We’re trying to improve people’s lives, especially women’s lives, because that’s the bulk of our audience at this company.

When I wake up in the morning, I think how fortunate I am to get to do this. And I think has Carey (Carey Witmer, executive VP/group publisher) emailed me yet (Laughs), because we’re in constant contact, and I think, when do I get to see Rachael again, because I’m psyched that I get to go down to her studio and work with her, and talk about making cool stuff. And I think how psyched I am to have the greatest team in magazines working with me. Our food team is just a bunch of geniuses, they translate Rachael’s vision so beautifully when it comes to food. And then our lifestyle; we’ve just exploded our lifestyle section and tripled it. Our lifestyle editor, Danielle Blundell, is just magnificent. She has the perfect eye and she’s a hustler too, and she’s just making great pages for us, so I think of all of these people when I get up.

But mostly, I think of the reader. I want people to want to open this magazine. I want them to want to buy it, and I want them to want to open it. We’ve been working on modernizing the aesthetic and making it feel less kitchy and more cool, beautiful and delicious.

Samir Husni: Is it a two-way street with Rachael; she brings ideas to you and you take ideas to her? How does it work when you’re editor in chief of a celebrity-driven title?

Lauren Iannotti: It’s totally a two-way street. Rachael is really receptive. I have been getting to know her personally over the last month, because I didn’t have tons of interaction with her when I was executive editor. And she’s super-supportive and bursting with ideas, so it definitely goes both ways. We talk regularly and we text a lot. We email a lot too. Whatever communication works best for what we’re trying to accomplish. And we also have in-person meetings a lot.

That collaboration is so much fun to me, in that she’s so supportive of the Rachael Ray Every Day brand, the magazine and the digital. She loves this brand, and she’s very protective of her own brand. She wants to make sure that she’s well-represented, as she should.

So, we work closely together. She really is an idea’s person. It’s fun to watch that work. She is also very off-the-cuff; she isn’t a teleprompter type. Something may be on the tip of her tongue and it comes out, so that authenticity, that realness, is so appealing and makes the job so much fun. We just redesigned, and I’ve worked at titles before that were redesigned, and they start the redesign process with “what does our brand mean,” and they have to have a brainstorm about what readers think their magazine actually means. So, we would start from the very beginning with “we don’t really know” and “what’s our tagline mean,” “should we explain it to people.”

At Rachael Ray Every Day, we have such a solid brand that it was never in doubt what we stood for. It was never a “start from scratch.” It was “how do we take this awesome brand that we know is great and make it fresh and modern, maintain our readership we already have, and expand our readership into new audiences.” So, we were really lucky to have that, and through the whole redesign process it felt like that. Our aim was true; when our consulting creative director would give us options, it was simple, that one. And we really benefit from that, and I think that’s all because Rachael Ray knows her brand. And they’ve done a bang-up job of protecting her brand and making sure that it’s well-represented on all fronts. It’s a pleasure to work on this brand, because it’s so clear and so good.

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of wine; reading a magazine; cooking; watching TV; or something else?

Lauren Iannotti: You would probably find me rolling on the floor with a ten year old and a two year old. There’s probably a glass of wine somewhere, but we can’t keep it too close because it would spill on the carpet. My schedule has really prevented me from doing it, but let’s say it’s on the weekend, you would find me in the kitchen, definitely drinking a glass of wine, and cooking something, usually pasta, for my family when I can. So, it’s the kids and the food.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Lauren Iannotti: She’s good at what she does, and she’s good to people. Kindness and excellence are what I try to go for always.

Samir Husni: My typical last question; what keeps you up at night?

Lauren Iannotti: What doesn’t? (Laughs) Do people sleep these days?

Samir Husni: (Laughs too).

Lauren Iannotti: I can tell you what doesn’t keep me up. I’m not worried about content. I think people still seek out great content, so these legacy brands will be fine as long as they keep doing the great work that people expect from them. What keeps me up at night could be anything from climate change to what’s happening in Myanmar to what’s happening in this country. It could be a hurricane or it could be a mass shooting, one of the several that happens every day in this country. I think there is plenty out there in the world to worry about and it doesn’t go away, and Facebook is constantly reminding me of that. And I thank Facebook for that.

I just feel lucky that I get to do something that in some ways improves those things and that our namesake is a very charitable person and is very focused on what’s going on in the world. But in other ways, the brand brings me moments that can take my mind off of things, and that’s what I hope we do for our readers.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

Cosmopolitan’s Editor In Chief, Michele Promaulayko, To Samir “Mr. Magazine™” Husni: “It’s Great To Have A Brand That Lives Across Every Platform In Such A Robust Way.” The Mr. Magazine™ Interview…

October 4, 2017

“But when Cosmo came calling, it was a combination of things. It was the most iconic, global, young women’s brand, and only four other people had sat in that seat, so of course I wanted it. I had so much affection for the brand, having spent years there. And yes, I did miss print, to be honest. I missed the ability to have the deeper storytelling, to have the lush visuals, to have time to digest things and to think about how you want to execute them.” Michele Promaulayko

When you’re THE magazine for women when they want to get an authoritative and unequivocal voice on sex, relationships, work, and anything else that has to do with their overall wellbeing and get that advice with a twinge of humor and sass, and you’ve been doing it since the mid-sixties when your editor in chief was the inimitable Helen Gurley Brown, why would you want to refresh that page of success?

Why? Well, because your current editor in chief is the inimitable Michele Promaulayko and while she totally agrees that nothing about Cosmopolitan is “broken,” there’s also nothing wrong with infusing a healthy dose of “newness, novelty, excitement, and more visuals” into the already extraordinary pot of deliciousness.

Cosmopolitan has always been a trendsetter, going back to the days of the spunky Ms. HGB. And nothing about that character trait has changed in the years since Helen. The magazine has evolved of course, but never changed from its cutting edge content that always pushes the envelope and provides its audience with the most current and captivating information.

Today, Cosmo is helmed by Michele Promaulayko, who knows a thing or two about the magazine, having been executive editor for eight years before joining Women’s Health as VP/editor in chief. She also served as the editor in chief of Yahoo Health, a digital-only entity, before coming back home to Cosmo.

I spoke with Michele recently and we talked about the retooling and refreshing of the highly successful and popular brand. Michele is excited about the refresh, because she believes disruption can be good when it comes to infusing a new energy into the magazine’s pages, bringing old friends new life and introducing new neighbors into the community so they can begin to add their own positivity and clarity to the equation. And finding innovative and creative ways to bring the print and digital components together communally is another faction that is proving to be successful for the magazine. With the November issue, readers will find new friends and old ones living in harmony between the magazine’s covers and enjoy the same humor and sauciness that has always been a part of its DNA.

So, sit back, grab your favorite beverage of choice (Rosé, if you’re anything like Cosmo’s delightful editor in chief) and enjoy the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Michele Promaulayko, editor in chief, Cosmopolitan.

But first the sound-bites:

On why she felt the need for a refresh of Cosmopolitan in this day and age: In today’s world novelty and newness are rewarded, so I felt like it was time for a design refresh. I’m not calling it a redesign, because there are definitely some things that are carryovers from the former design; nothing was really broken. It was really just about infusing it with newness, novelty, excitement, and more visuals.

On why she believes Cosmo hasn’t faded like some of the other trendsetting magazines have over the years: I think it’s because Cosmo has a very honest relationship with its readers. From Helen’s day (Helen Gurley Brown), to my day, we talk openly with them about anything and everything. So, it’s a place where they can come for real talk, frank information on the things that matter to them most, and that’s never going to go out of style. The packaging, yes; we stay on trends; we tap into the zeitgeist, talking about current things. But at our core, our foundation is to help young women navigate in an increasingly confusing world, whether that’s their work-world or their relationship-world. And they know that we’re going to give it to them straight.

On whether she thinks that foundational concept is still as valid as ever or even more so today: I think it’s always been valid in certain conversations, be they about sex or women’s advancement in the workplace. Decades ago those were taboo topics that weren’t talked about openly, so it was important for Cosmo to do that then. And I think it’s just as, or more important, to have those conversations now.

On whether she feels more balanced working for a publication that has both a print and digital platform, rather than when she was editor of the digital-only Yahoo Health: That’s a great question. I left Women’s Health to go to Yahoo, because I really wanted to immerse myself in digital. Obviously, I was seeing consumer media habits. My own habits were becoming more and more digital and I really wanted to learn the ropes there, and it was a tremendous experience. Previously, I’d had 20 years of print experience. But when Cosmo came calling, it was a combination of things. It was the most iconic, global, young women’s brand, and only four other people had sat in that seat, so of course I wanted it. I had so much affection for the brand, having spent years there.

On who the magazine would turn into if struck with a magic wand that made it human: I’m not sure there’s just one person who would personify all of the strengths of Cosmopolitan. That would be a pretty amazing person and I’d like to meet them, because I sort of think of us as counselor, cheerleader, protector, and best friend. We have all of those roles in different areas of the magazine.

On the reaction she’s hoping for from the audience once they see the retooled and refreshed November issue of Cosmopolitan: I don’t have any hard and fast expectations. I solicited their feedback and I hope I get that. And I think it takes time for people to adjust to change and sometimes to even notice it. Some of the changes are extremely noticeable, but hopefully I will hear specific things back from readers.

On whether there is anything in Cosmo that ever makes her blush: No, it’s funny, it’s like a party game with my friends, let’s see if you can make Michele blush, because after all of the years I spent at Cosmo as the executive editor, and then coming back, it’s almost impossible. But now that I’ve said that, it’s like I’ve issued a challenge. (Laughs) Somebody is going to try really hard to embarrass me. But when it comes to these topics, not really.

On anything she’d like to add: Just that we’re all about the humor and the joy and the surprise. We live in a very serious world right now, politically serious, and serious in that we’re dealing with one natural disaster after another. And Cosmo is a place where, yes, we talk about issues, absolutely, but it’s also a place where we can provide levity and joy. And that’s very intentional on our part, and I am very proud of that.

On what she would have tattooed upon her brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about her: Maybe two X’s on a globe. (Laughs) Hugs to the world. The world could use more hugs, right? More love and more hugs. Cosmo is really about harmony. Harmony between the sexes; harmony and self-peace; feeling confident, and that’s one of the things that we try and instill in our readers. Maybe it’s just the word harmony.

On what someone would find her doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at her home: Well, one, you probably won’t catch me at home, because I go out a lot a night. I have a lot of dinners outside of my place. You’d be lucky if you tried to just stop by, an impromptu visit, and I was there. But if I was there, I probably wouldn’t be drinking, because I rarely drink alone. But I do like to drink with other people. And I might be binging on the latest Netflix thing, because I’m a big binger. And it doesn’t have to be Netflix, it can be anything. Right now, I’m binging Jessica Biel’s USA show called “The Sinner.”

On what keeps her up at night: What keeps me up at night isn’t one thing. And honestly, I’m a pretty good sleeper, so not too much keeps me up. I really love my life; I love all of the interesting things that I get to do and the places that I get to go, and the place that I live; just all of that. I think it’s just the challenges of maintaining that awesome level of experience, because it takes a lot. It takes a lot of work and a lot of energy. So, just knowing that I’m tending to everything well enough to keep it all going at the same level, or at an increased level.

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Michele Promaulayko, editor in chief, Cosmopolitan.

Samir Husni: Why did you feel the need to retool and reengineer Cosmo in this day and age?

Michele Promaulayko: In today’s world novelty and newness are rewarded, so I felt like it was time for a design refresh. I’m not calling it a redesign, because there are definitely some things that are carryovers from the former design; nothing was really broken. It was really just about infusing it with newness, novelty, excitement, and more visuals. As our readers’ needs change and as trends change; as we spend more time with the audience; as we get tired of looking at the same pages ourselves (Laughs), it tells you that it’s time to put a sheen on it. So, that’s what we did and we had a lot of fun doing it.

And in doing it, we disrupted some long-held magazine tenants; for instance, having a TOC. We now have a one-page table of contents called “Get Into It,” and it really has all of the information a reader needs. It has the cover lines, so if you’re pulled in by a cover line, you can go to the page and find it. It has the section heads; you can find the wellness section; you can find the beauty section, so it provides the navigation a reader might want without seeing three pages of cute captions that nobody reads. I felt like that was an old carryover that we editors reflexively use in our magazine and I just didn’t feel like we needed it anymore.

Samir Husni: One of my recent class lectures was on the six magazines that in the last decade have been trendsetters: Cosmopolitan, Playboy, MS., The Advocate, Ebony, and Rolling Stone. Why do you think Cosmo over the years never faded like the other five have?

Michele Promaulayko: Great question, and thank you for including Cosmopolitan in that short-list. I think it’s because Cosmo has a very honest relationship with its readers. From Helen’s day (Helen Gurley Brown), to my day, we talk openly with them about anything and everything. So, it’s a place where they can come for real talk, frank information on the things that matter to them most, and that’s never going to go out of style. The packaging, yes; we stay on trends; we tap into the zeitgeist, talking about current things. But at our core, our foundation is to help young women navigate in an increasingly confusing world, whether that’s their work-world or their relationship-world. And they know that we’re going to give it to them straight. It’s not going to be a bunch of platitudes about how wonderful everything is all of the time.

We obviously have a lot of fun in the magazine and that’s another part of the brand’s DNA that I wanted to sort of reinstitute a little bit, but the primary thing is that we have this really candid conversation with readers. And they know that they can’t get that anywhere else.

Samir Husni: Do you feel that foundational concept is still valid today or even more so than it was in the ‘60s, ‘70s, and ‘80s?

Michele Promaulayko: I think it’s always been valid in certain conversations, be they about sex or women’s advancement in the workplace. Decades ago those were taboo topics that weren’t talked about openly, so it was important for Cosmo to do that then. And I think it’s just as, or more important, to have those conversations now.

Young women have a much more confusing set of circumstances to deal with, even if you just distill the dating scene. It’s so different now than it used to be. It’s so confusing. We live in this app-driven dating world, which has really depersonalized the process. We hear from young women all of the time about these pen pal relationships with guys that they meet online and they have conversations with them, but then they never actually meet up. And there’s so much frustration and confusion, and when they do meet up, they’re so used to having these digital conversations, they just sort of look at each other and ask, “What do we do now?” (Laughs)

That’s the extreme version of it, but something as simple as dating has gotten so confusing and complex. So, I think our ability to have that kind of straight talk with them about that or anything else is critical now.

Samir Husni: I coined a phrase for what you’re describing, I call it “Isolated Connectivity.” We feel we’re so connected, yet we’re more isolated than ever.

Michele Promaulayko: Exactly. And that’s the sad reality; we have more ability to connect and more channels to connect through, however, we are more isolated. And I’ll tell you a funny anecdote.

This summer I went to Greece with a friend; we visited a couple of islands. And I was on this tiny satellite island called Antiparos, and I was at this bar/restaurant, beach club and I looked over and saw a guy that lives two doors down from me in my apartment building in Manhattan. And I had never really spoken to him; I recognized him, but I had never had a conversation with him and we live two doors down from each other. And now I’m on this little Greek island and I thought I was seeing things, but I hadn’t had that much Rosé; I’d had a little, but not that much. (Laughs) I wasn’t hallucinating.

So, I walked over to him and introduced myself. He was like me, he couldn’t believe we’d ran into each other there, it was weird. We get back to New York and he slips a note under my door that simply read, “Wow, that was weird. Let’s grab a drink; hope you had a great trip.” I posted the note on my Instagram and Facebook, and it blew up. It broke the Internet. I got more engagement, more comments, and more likes that on anything else I had posted.

And it was simply because people saw that; and by the way, it’s not a romantic storyline, he’s gay, we’re not going to get married, but the people who were seeing this note and hearing the story of how I met my now-neighbor on a little island in Greece, were so enthralled with the idea of this meet-cute story, this romantic storyline, because we’re so devoid of that. I actually write about this in my next editor’s letter in the November issue, because we have a lot of dating content and I wanted to make a point about how illuminating that was for me. It shows how desperate and hungry people are for a sort of retrograde meeting. To your point, that just goes to show that the isolated connectivity is there.

Samir Husni: How are you utilizing the print Cosmo and the digital Cosmo? You have both in your background; you were the editor in chief of Women’s Health and then you were editor in chief of Yahoo Health, which was digital-only. Are you more balanced within yourself now, having a print brand that’s also digital, rather than just digital only?

Michele Promaulayko: That’s a great question. I left Women’s Health to go to Yahoo, because I really wanted to immerse myself in digital. Obviously, I was seeing consumer media habits. My own habits were becoming more and more digital and I really wanted to learn the ropes there, and it was a tremendous experience. Previously, I’d had 20 years of print experience.

But when Cosmo came calling, it was a combination of things. It was the most iconic, global, young women’s brand, and only four other people had sat in that seat, so of course I wanted it. I had so much affection for the brand, having spent years there. And yes, I did miss print, to be honest. I missed the ability to have the deeper storytelling, to have the lush visuals, to have time to digest things and to think about how you want to execute them.

So, of course, it’s great to have a brand that lives across every platform in such a robust way. All of the social platforms; all of the digital platforms; live events; TV shows, and a super-healthy print brand. All things considered, yes, it was the dream job.

The difference being that as a monthly magazine, we have to think about how we play to those strengths. And we clearly can’t capitalize on news the way Cosmopolitan.com can, but what we can do is take a timely story, because we still try to be timely, we don’t want to be evergreen. We’re not looking to do things this year that could appear in the magazine next year, or could have appeared last year, we want it to be timely.

So, we take something that’s happening in the zeitgeist and we try and assess whether it’s going to have a long enough shelf life for us to talk and write about it, and then also exploit some aspect of the story that a digital site isn’t going to take the time to get into. So, really, using newsy things as a hook to get into what it might mean for the reader. And how it applies to their life in a way that’s not just reporting on the news, but going deeper.

Samir Husni: One of Cosmo’s attributes since its founding has been the magazine’s ability to create a friendly relationship with its audience. That being said, if you had a magic wand that could instantaneously turn the magazine into a human being with one strike, who would that person be?

Michele Promaulayko: (Laughs) I’m not sure there’s just one person who would personify all of the strengths of Cosmopolitan. That would be a pretty amazing person and I’d like to meet them, because I sort of think of us as counselor, cheerleader, protector, and best friend. We have all of those roles in different areas of the magazine.

We’re like a best friend, you can talk honestly with us and we’re going to give it to you straight, and we’re going to make you laugh. We’re going to warn you if there’s things out there in the world, whether it’s health wise or potential dating pitfalls, or even bigger dangers; we’re going to protect you from that and warn you so that you’re going into everything with eyes open. And we’re going to champion the things that you do that are so great, and bolster you and tell you that you can do it. And we’re going to give you the authoritative advice that we have the ability to give, that your best friend can’t because they don’t have the expertise at their fingertips.
So, I don’t really think one person could possibly embody that, which is why you need a magazine like Cosmopolitan, because even if you have a village at your disposal, you may not have all of those things.

Samir Husni: Looking at the November issue, I read your letter from the editor, and I saw your signature, the two X’s and Michele. And then when I flipped to page 154, I see a list of symbols and what they are supposed to mean.

Michele Promaulayko: (Laughs) Oh no, are you dissecting my scribbles?

Samir Husni: And it read that two X-crosses means pent-up frustration about something. What are you frustrated about, Michele? (Laughs)

Michele Promaulayko: (Laughs again) No, Samir, those are crosses and mine were X’s; they’re not the same thing. Mine just means hugs. Hugs, Michele, that’s really what it means.

Samir Husni: Once your audience sees this retooling, this fresh look with the November issue, the double covers; what is the reaction you hope to get?

Michele Promaulayko: I don’t have any hard and fast expectations. I solicited their feedback and I hope I get that. And I think it takes time for people to adjust to change and sometimes to even notice it. Some of the changes are extremely noticeable, but hopefully I will hear specific things back from readers. But the decisions we made to change things were made based on what’s happening in the world and on things we were hearing anyway. So, it’s not like we just pulled them out of thin air. They’re grounded in what we know to be the most useful and exciting execution.

To that point, readers tell us that they want order and organization. They want a clear architecture, so they know where they are in the magazine. And we did that. But at the same time they want to be surprised, so they want to know where they are and they want some kind of formula to that, but they also want those moments of serendipity; wow, I can’t believe they did that! So, we’ve allowed room for that.

And with the TOC, I just felt like it was two extra pages that weren’t working as hard as they needed to work and that we could dedicate those to something more exciting. So, we boiled that down to one page that gives them everything that they need to find the stories that they want to find.

Another thing that we did was change the health section to wellness. I have a background in that, and wellness really speaks to the 360 approach that we take to health. So, it’s mental health, nutrition, fitness, sexual health, emotional health; it’s the whole thing that contributes to your wellbeing. And we wanted to reflect that in the name. And we also did this “One-Move Workout,” which is a great workout in only one move, and who wouldn’t want that?

And that’s the point. They’re not coming to Cosmo for a full workout, they’re going to other brands or they’re going to Cosmopolitan.com, but what we can do is provide this really graphic visual that they can then take a picture of or tear it out and bring it to the gym or the hotel and have something healthy and useful. And that’s what we want to be.

We also started our “Gyno Report” because Cosmo should own sexual health. Again, it’s a place where we can be authoritative and honest, so I wanted to provide a place where we could talk about the latest and most important sexual and reproductive health issues.

And we have some really strong, bold visual pages; some of the beauty pages; one of the workouts that I just talked about, and also “Cosmo Bites,” and that’s because we’re dealing with a readership that’s addicted to images. And we wanted to give them these really grabby, bold images, that in some cases also contain service, like the beauty photos that still have service, but they’re not text heavy. And I think you need that kind of difference in pacing. You need some longer reads, some really visual things, things that are easy to digest.

And we also wanted to strengthen the companionship between different factions of the brand. We wanted to have things in common with Cosmopolitan.com, so they’re doing the Workout as well. Cosmo Bites is something that they do; Cheap Thrills, the sort of budget beauty page is something that we’re both going to be doing.

We’re increasing that relationship between the digital and the print sides of the brand. And we’re also deepening the companionship between your device and the print version. In other words, you might snap a picture of your One-Move Workout, so you’re using your device at the same time you’re reading the print version.

Those are some of the changes. And then we added a section called “Too Funny.” We absolutely know that humor is a huge reason that people come to Cosmo; it’s always been a part of the brand’s DNA. There have always been Laugh Out Loud cover lines and the Confessions and the Dates From Hell, and those are some of our readers’ favorite things. They love it. So, we corralled them all into one section called “Too Funny.”

Samir Husni: The entire refreshing of the book is extremely well-packaged.

Michele Promaulayko: Thank you.

Samir Husni: Is there anything in Cosmo that makes you blush?

Michele Promaulayko: No, it’s funny, it’s like a party game with my friends, let’s see if you can make Michele blush, because after all of the years I spent at Cosmo as the executive editor, and then coming back, it’s almost impossible. But now that I’ve said that, it’s like I’ve issued a challenge. (Laughs) Somebody is going to try really hard to embarrass me. But when it comes to these topics, not really.

In fact, I don’t know if you’ve heard of the Grub Street Diet, but New York Magazine gets different people, authors and actresses, writers and editors, to do sort of a food diary. And they asked me to do it and it came out recently. In there, you talk about what you’re eating all day, but you also talk about other things. And I was saying that I grabbed a certain food and went to a cover line meeting with my creative director and we always decide that we’re not done until we’re laughing or one of us is blushing. And I said it’s usually not me. It’s usually my creative director. (Laughs)

Samir Husni: Is there anything else you’d like to add?

Michele Promaulayko: Just that we’re all about the humor and the joy and the surprise. We live in a very serious world right now, politically serious, and serious in that we’re dealing with one natural disaster after another. And Cosmo is a place where, yes, we talk about issues, absolutely, but it’s also a place where we can provide levity and joy. And that’s very intentional on our part, and I am very proud of that.

And also, just talking about the climate politically. There’s such a division between the sexes and I really feel like Cosmo has always appreciated men who appreciate women, in that we have an opportunity to unify the sexes, and that’s another mission of mine. We all have to be in this together, so those are important things.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Michele Promaulayko: Maybe two X’s on a globe. (Laughs) Hugs to the world. The world could use more hugs, right? More love and more hugs. Cosmo is really about harmony. Harmony between the sexes; harmony and self-peace; feeling confident, and that’s one of the things that we try and instill in our readers. Maybe it’s just the word harmony.

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of Rosé, and I’ll be specific since I know you like Rosé; reading a magazine; cooking; watching TV; or something else?

Michele Promaulayko: Well, one, you probably won’t catch me at home, because I go out a lot a night. I have a lot of dinners outside of my place. You’d be lucky if you tried to just stop by, an impromptu visit, and I was there. But if I was there, I probably wouldn’t be drinking, because I rarely drink alone. But I do like to drink with other people.

And I might be binging on the latest Netflix thing, because I’m a big binger. And it doesn’t have to be Netflix, it can be anything. Right now, I’m binging Jessica Biel’s USA show called “The Sinner.” And I don’t know if I can ever go back to waiting for one episode after another to come out, because I like watching them back-to-back. I go into a feeding frenzy. So, if you happen to catch me at home, when I’m not out to dinner, I’ll probably be chilling on my couch, binging on the latest show that I’m obsessed with.

Samir Husni: My typical last question; what keeps you up at night?

Michele Promaulayko: The sirens that roar down my street in New York. Truthfully, the only thing that could keep me up is just worrying about the wellbeing of my family. That’s the only thing. I have parents who are getting older. But if it’s a question aimed at the challenges of the industry, that would be a different answer.

What keeps me up at night isn’t one thing. And honestly, I’m a pretty good sleeper, so not too much keeps me up. I really love my life; I love all of the interesting things that I get to do and the places that I get to go, and the place that I live; just all of that. I think it’s just the challenges of maintaining that awesome level of experience, because it takes a lot. It takes a lot of work and a lot of energy. So, just knowing that I’m tending to everything well enough to keep it all going at the same level, or at an increased level.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

Out Magazine At 25: A Mr. Magazine™ Interview From The Vault With Founding Editor Sarah Pettit…

October 4, 2017

Aaron Hicklin, Editor in Chief, of Out magazine asks in his intro to the 25th Anniversary issue of the magazine, “How do you write an editor’s letter marking an anniversary?

Well rather than telling you how Aaron answered his question in this blog, (thus giving you the opportunity to go buy a copy of the magazine and find Aaron’s answer on your own), I opted to go into the Mr. Magazine™ vault and publish an interview I did with the founding editor of Out magazine, the late Sarah Pettit. Sarah, who died at the young age of 36 in 2003, was the founding editor and former editor in chief of Out magazine. The interview was published in my book Launch Your Own Magazine in 1998 and is reprinted below as it appeared in the book.

Sarah Pettit is the editor-in-chief of Out, a general interest magazine for gays and lesbians published by Out Publishing Inc. The first issue of Out appeared in 1992.
At what stage and in what capacity did you join Out?

I wasn’t the founder. The founder was Michael Goff, and the magazine was already established when I came into it. But I worked on the first issue. I helped to launch it. But I started work with the editorial. Everything else was already there.

What type of advice would you give someone who is launching a magazine?

I would probably tell them to walk to their nearest newsstand and take a look to see if what they want to do has already been done. And if it has been done, in what way has it been done, and how are their ideas different?

I think, especially in any major urban area, you can look at any newsstand of any size and find an enormous array of titles on pretty much everything from fly fishing to car mechanics to gay and lesbian lifestyles. For instance, the one I work on had pretty much been covered. But when we launched our magazine, what we noticed by looking at the newsstand was that there were no monthly feature magazines targeted to the gay and lesbian audience, nothing that addressed their issues in a full quality, industry standard way. So we said, “Well, there’s something that need to be done which hasn’t been done and that, obviously, people are going to be interested in.”

If you see that there are already five or six people doing it, and you are not going to bring anything particular new to the story, then you probably won’t have too much success. Unless, of course, you are a major magazine company and you can figure out how to squeeze out all of the little guys. But to the entrepreneur, it probably should be something with some necessity behind it.

How can an entrepreneur give the concept that special spin?

I think what we said was, you know there are probably a fair number of gays and lesbians in America. No one knows exactly how to count them, but even a rough estimate certainly puts them at the size of a magazine that is acceptable to launch. Most of the major companies want a magazine to hit about five hundred thousand at the get go, but it depends on how quickly you are going to increase your circulation. You have got to have a reasonable amount of circulation pretty soon after the launch to be able to warrant your expenses.

I think the way you put the twist on your idea is by finding something unique and special. I think what we found as this group of people who have a lot of common interests, whether that’s the more political aspects of what a gay issue is, or whether it’s the more cultural aspects of things, or if it’s simply the basic questions of how to organize your finances with your partner. Any of those things that are straightforward service questions, as they say in the magazine trade.

We knew that there was no real, centralized place they could go for that information in a consistent way. Doing a magazine such as ours would provide people with a unique publishing product that they probably couldn’t get anywhere else. As with any audience, what you want to do is look at your group and say, “What is it about these people that pulls them together?” What are their shared interests? And what is it about this product that you are giving them that no one else can?”

You know, obviously for gay men and lesbians, it’s even harder because in the past it’s been this community of people who are so dispersed. It was harder for them to identify themselves and speak of their common experiences. So, for a magazine, this is a very good thing because you want people who are hungry for information and for what you want to bring them.

Is there anything you would have done differently?

I honestly don’t know if I would have done too much differently. I know one thing that is very important is not to grow your magazine more quickly than it can handle. One of the classic ways you can go bust is to grow too fast and too furiously. Don’t start laying on a bunch of staff that you can’t afford to keep.

When we made our first magazine, we were in the offices of another company. Esquire actually offered us the space at Hearst Publications because the man who designed our first issue, Roger Black, had his design studio at Esquire. He worked on Esquire as their art guru, so we had the space and we had access to computers and it was all for very little money.

We had five or six people who worked on it, but now, five years later, we have a staff of thirty-two, including people from all over the magazine industry. Our publishers just spent eighteen years at the New York Times in the business department. Our president was at the Times for years, too, and at the Hartford Courant before that. We now have people from all over.

You can get competitive and start paying the good salaries later on, but don’t get too crazy. I think that is one of the problems that people have. They think that they can launch fancy offices with pretty desks and nice carpeting, but they don’t think about the fact that the magazine business is really expensive. Last year, for example, our paper costs went up 60%. That’s something that you can’t foresee, and if you have too much up front, costs can really kill you.

What advice would you give for recruiting staff?

I think one of the key things is to get people who really feel like they want to come to their jobs in the morning. I think you have to inspire them in whatever way. To our benefit, we were making a magazine that a lot of our staff felt was really important. They personally felt very compassionate about the idea of bringing information to a group of people who had not had that before.

So you have the professional motivation of mixing a good product with a lot of pride. If you can hit people at home and make them feel like they are really doing something important, you can come out with any magazine. You can make a magazine about golf and make people who work with you feel that it’s important. Often, I feel that people equate that with young, hungry talent. I don’t know if that has to do with age or point of view, but it’s best to not have people who feel like they’re doing you a favor just by coming to work.

And there is something to be said for people with magazine backgrounds. I think one of the things that created the biggest problem for the gay press is the thought that, “OH, anyone can make a magazine.” Well, no, not anyone can make a magazine. Part of what makes a good magazine is having people with magazine talent. It’s a unique skill, just like any skill.

What’s the greatest lesson you’ve learned from the Out launch?

Oh, I wish I had more money! Actually, it’s been very interesting. I think that I have learned that money isn’t everything, even though I just said it was.

You look at something like the report that when House and Garden relaunched this fall from Conde Nast, they spent forty-four million dollars over the course of a year or two. That was just to get to the point of relaunching the magazine, just to get to that one issue. Forty-four million dollars-all for prototypes and staff and shooting stories that they wouldn’t use.

There was this enormous kind of loading of that project, and then I look at what I have. Forty-four million dollars, based on how much money we spent in the first five years, we could be around for the next two thousand years. We’re talking about just enormous amounts of money. And then I look at how little I do with, and I say, “Gee.” It really kind of makes you appreciate the value of every dollar. Some of this stuff is just crazy. It doesn’t need to be this expensive, but money, unfortunately, is useful and you need a lot of it for magazines, for good writers anyway.

Do you do most of your work in-house?

Most of our writing is freelanced.

Is that something you’ve done from beginning?

Yes. We try to work with a pretty broad array of people and keep that mix up. The premise of the magazine has always been that we go to talent from all over the industry – whether people are working on TV Guide or Essence or Vanity Fair – and bring them to Out where they can do special stories that are especially relevant. Whether it is the arts writer who can write about books for us or the entertainment journalists who can’t do exactly that story where they are based. It’s kind of taking people’s real world specialties and bringing them to Out where they make sense for us.

You know, in some next world, it would be nice to have a broad base of people whom you could pay to keep on retainer. But I think people can be really wasteful with that, too. There are major magazines that can lock up millions of people. They want people to be dedicated just to them, and they pay them huge amounts of money so they don’t work for anyone else. That kind of stuff can be ego-driven. And ridiculous, too. Is it really worth it to spend a hundred thousand dollars just to keep someone from writing for anyone else?

What about the actual birth of Out? Who developed the concept and how did it grow?

The idea was essentially Roger Black’s, who was behind the first issues of the magazine. Michael Goff, the actual founder, worked for Roger and they were always working on this idea of what would it be like to start a gay magazine. They had started doing prototypes that were targeting only the male readers, and then they actually decided to expand it and make it for men and women.
After the initial investor was brought on board, that’s when I came on and started to open offices about six months later.

During those six months, what types of struggles did you face? Did any of them change your thinking?

I do think that their initial of audience focus was big because emphasis on demographics is really important. I don’t know I guess the cliché is that launches always lead to big fights, and people change and sort of drop off. We really didn’t have a whole lot of that.

I think that once we were committed, that first year we were in business, there really wasn’t time for anything else. I think that the good thing about Michael’s initial idea, once he had the germ of it, was that the message of the magazine and the focus of the magazine and the content have always been consistent. It’s not like it started one way and then it morphed and changed a million times. I think that is the way you lose readers. Michael was pretty clear that we were launching a general interest, national magazine for gay men and lesbians.

I think he knew it was going to be topical; it was going to have features and art coverage and fashion. It was going to be a monthly features magazine that a gay Vanity Fair would be. In fact, that was one of our buzz lines. He pretty much kept that vision and we have kept it to this day. I think that is really helpful because people aren’t trying to figure out what we are.

I also think it was really helpful that we were considered iconoclastic and weird because it was a gay magazine and the whole structure of how you make a magazine and the whole structure of how you make a magazine was in pretty classic terms. We were going to make a magazine and we were going to make it for audiences that hadn’t had that. So the buzz line that came out of that was a traditional magazine for a nontraditional audience. Now, we weren’t trying to reinvent the wheel. We were just trying to drive the wheel to a different place, as it were.

What about advertisers?

I think the main thing is that, in the last five years, we have brought on every major advertising category, from fashion to automotive to electronics. In the past, the gay press had never been supported by any mainstream advertisers, and it was considered to be something that was pretty much impossible.

The buzz word was kind of like, “You will get Absolut and you will get Benetton – and the rest of it, well you will have to make do with love.” And that did not prove to be the case at all. What we showed was that we made a quality magazine, and we had a lot of quality contributors, great articles, great photography. People like Roger Black were behind it, and the people in the industry recognized that, and it kind of trickled down.

I think media buyers and people in the industry had to look at that and recognize, “Here’s a great way to reach there people and to target these people in a place we haven’t been able to get to until now.” Ellen DeGeneres’ character coming out on TV aside, there really haven’t been that many gay media outlets.

So I think it coincided with a moment in the media when people were looking for a way to find new niche markets, and one of the hot, new niches in the early nineties was the gay and lesbian market. It still continues to be. Out majestically came at just about the right time for people. It did it in the same way that ten or twenty years previous, people tried to target the African American industry or the Latino industry.

In that respect, the advertising story became a much richer one than people thought it might because we had everyone from fashion retail to automotive to electronic to expensive liquor and tobacco and a lot of other industry that supports magazines. So, in that way, we were looked at as a test case, and a very successful test case.

How important is flexibility?

You have to have a good message, and you have to be convinced about it. If it’s like a square peg going into a round hole, and you are bringing people a message and a magazine that no one wants, and you stick to it, you are just going to go down in flames anyway.

But I do think that if you have a good idea, you’ve got to stick to it for a while because you won’t see much happening overnight. You know, it takes a while for small magazines launching on their own to grow like ours has. We are having our fifth anniversary this year, and I am only just now beginning to feel like our magazine is really taking off. It just takes so long.

When you take carrots and potatoes and chicken and you put it in a pot, it takes a while for the flavor to happen, and it does not happen overnight. If you get panicky, and you bail out before you give it a chance to get going, you are not going to have a very good stew. You just have to keep it going for a while. Obviously. Simmering that stew is expensive, and in the magazine world, not a lot of people can sit around and wait for that to happen.

h1

A Shortcut To Quality, Credibility, And Trust: Magazine Media. Better. Believe It. A Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Linda Thomas Brooks, President and CEO, MPA: The Magazine Media Association & Michael Clinton, President, Marketing And Publishing Director, Hearst Magazines.

October 3, 2017

Magazine Media. Better. Believe It. Explained.
‘Who keeps your flame? Who tells your story?’

“Part of what we’re doing is talking to consumers to remind them that magazine media brands have that credibility… People have figured out that not all content is created equal and consumers are using magazine brands as a shortcut to quality… All of the outside research, not MPA research, proves that magazines build brands and sell products at the same time better than any other media channel.” Linda Thomas Brooks…

“Consumers and marketers are asking themselves who they can trust in a world with a lot of digital fraud and wrong information. Magazine media content is trustworthy. Our editors create print and digital content in safe environments with brands that people respect and believe in. It’s the moment in time for us to lead the narrative.” Michael Clinton…

A Mr. Magazine™ Exclusive…

“Publishing is believing,” a publisher friend of mine from The Netherlands once told me. And I told him Amen to that. In the magazine and magazine media business you are either 100 percent in it, or you’re not in at all. Magazine Media. Better. Believe it. And those last five words happen to be the basis of the new campaign that the MPA: The Association of Magazine Media is about to embark on today.

In the digital world we live in, consumers and marketers alike are searching for whom they can trust and in whom they can believe in. That is the main reason the magazine media industry is behind this consumer and marketing campaign that weeds fact from fiction in an age of fake news, fake content and fake advertising.

But why now? Why is today the best time to share this message that magazine media is the most trusted and credible source for engaging content over any other media form? The answer to that weighty question can be found here (among others), and is based on my recent interview with Linda Thomas Brooks, president and CEO of the MPA: The Magazine Media Association and Michael Clinton, president, marketing and publishing director, Hearst Magazines.

Linda and the MPA are staunch advocates for magazines and magazine media. And the central theme of this campaign is “Magazine Media. Better. Believe It.” It brings magazines’ uncanny ability to produce professional and credible content in a brand-safe environment to the forefront of consciousness, when claims of fake news are everywhere.

And recently, Michael wrote a Hearst feature article that’s very first line expelled any doubt as to what he and Hearst Magazines think about their admitted core print business: ‘Print is alive and well with consumers everywhere.’ And with Hearst Magazines being one of the many companies participating in the MPA’s ad campaign, it’s a given that “Magazine Media. Better. Believe It” is something they also strongly believe in.

So, I hope that you look past the recent headlines and give the acid test to the message that Linda and Michael are sharing, and agree that when it comes to truthfulness and abiding constancy in content and information, magazines are Better. Believe it. And now Linda Thomas Brooks, president & CEO, MPA: The Magazine Media Association, and Michael Clinton, president, marketing and publishing director, Hearst Magazines.

But first the sound-bites:

Linda Thomas Brooks

On what made the MPA decide that now was the right time for an ad campaign emphasizing credibility and trust in the media (Linda Thomas Brooks): You can look at this from two different standpoints. From the consumer’s standpoint; consumers just received a lesson in what it means that the media world has expanded so broadly. And they’re starting to figure out that not all content is created equal. And they’re trying to figure out who they can trust.

On what made Hearst Magazines decide now was the right time to participate in this ad campaign (Michael Clinton): Consumers and marketers are asking themselves who they can trust in a world with a lot of digital fraud and wrong information. Magazine media content is trustworthy. Our editors create print and digital content in safe environments with brands that people respect and believe in. It’s the moment in time for us to lead the narrative.

On whether she believes in this time of media circles and celebrity editors’ resignations, that it’s time to refocus on the magazines and magazine media brands rather than the people behind them (Linda Thomas Brooks): I don’t think it necessarily has to be one or the other, because those are iconic people and they did fantastic jobs for a long time and I think those magazine brands are as powerful as they are because the people behind them are so fantastic. But I think whoever replaces them, and in some cases that’s not known yet, I have no doubt that those people are going to be equally fantastic; probably differently fantastic.

Michael Clinton

On how this campaign fits into the Print Proud Digital Smart mantra Michael Clinton believes in (Michael Clinton): We pride ourselves on our editorial integrity regardless of platform. With a lot of false influencers that really have no influence, magazine brands and our editors influence consumers to take action.

On why she thinks the media industry is prone to talking about the negatives in the business rather than the positive stories (Linda Thomas Brooks): It’s a funny thing, isn’t it? Even though I’ve been part of very, very competitive industries before, I’ve never quite seen the same role of the trade press when it comes to eating their own young. (Laughs) And that’s part of what this is, stepping up to say this is the power that our magazine media brands have.

On why he thinks the media industry is prone to talking about the negatives in the business rather than the positive stories (Michael Clinton): There is a great line from the play “Hamilton.” ‘Who keeps your flame? Who tells your story?’ Every magazine professional has to have the passion to tell the story of our great medium. No one else will do it for us.

On how she believes in addition to the MPA’s campaign, the industry can show consumers and marketers that magazines are still the best reflectors of American society (Linda Thomas Brooks): That’s what we’re trying to do here is really start that conversation. This campaign will be going on for months. We’re going to be in 123 of our different magazine media properties in print in the next couple of months, but we’ll be in digital as well. We’re going to be trying to share this message and I hope that the message starts an industry conversation, or continues an industry conversation that I think has already started, which is about brand safety.

On anything that she’d like to add (Linda Thomas Brooks): I think that the idea of magazines being a shortcut to quality is something that I keep hearkening back to, because I think it’s really important for both consumers and marketers to understand that.


And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Linda Thomas Brooks, president and chief executive officer of MPA: The Association of Magazine Media, and Michael Clinton, president, marketing and publishing director, Hearst Magazines.

Samir Husni: With everything taking place in the country regarding the media, why do you think now is the opportune time to sell magazine media’s story? There is a lot of fake news and many people have been predicting the industry’s demise; what made you decide it’s now or never to launch an ad campaign emphasizing credibility and trust in the media?

Linda Thomas Brooks: You can look at this from two different standpoints. From the consumer’s standpoint; consumers just received a lesson in what it means that the media world has expanded so broadly. And they’re starting to figure out that not all content is created equal. And they’re trying to figure out who they can trust.

Part of what we’re doing is talking to consumers to remind them that magazine media brands have that credibility and to be honest, they’re discovering this on their own, and if you look at the recent results for a lot of magazines, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and even magazines like Parents that has nothing to do with news or current events per se; people have figured out that not all content is created equal and consumers are using magazine brands as a shortcut to quality.

So, number one is to remind consumers. And number two is to remind marketers, because what marketers have seen in recent months is that their advertising isn’t having the results that they want. They’re not getting business growth. And we have all of the outside research, not MPA research, that proves that magazines build brands and sell products at the same time better than any other media channel.

And that’s not me saying that; it’s Millward Brown, Nielsen Catalina, and comScore saying it. All the proof points, and all of the problems marketers say they have; I hate to say it’s a Perfect Storm because that’s an overused analogy, but it’s a confluence of all of these things coming together, and we want to remind people on both sides of that. Where we sit, we’re the answer to all of those problems.

Michael Clinton: Consumers and marketers are asking themselves who they can trust in a world with a lot of digital fraud and wrong information. Magazine media content is trustworthy. Our editors create print and digital content in safe environments with brands that people respect and believe in. It’s the moment in time for us to lead the narrative.

Samir Husni: In the midst of all of the media circles, all of the resignations of some of the celebrity editors; do you feel that it’s the best time now to bring the focus back to the magazine and magazine media brands, rather than the people behind them?

Linda Thomas Brooks: I don’t think it necessarily has to be one or the other, because those are iconic people and they did fantastic jobs for a long time and I think those magazine brands are as powerful as they are because the people behind them are so fantastic. But I think whoever replaces them, and in some cases that’s not known yet, I have no doubt that those people are going to be equally fantastic; probably differently fantastic.

But those magazine brands have all been through more than one strong editor with a strong editorial voice, and those editors all left with those brands in such a rock-solid position; they didn’t leave them at a moment of weakness, they left them at a moment of really core strength. And I’m certain that will continue, because the publishers behind those brands know what they are and what they stand for.

Samir Husni: Michael, how does this campaign fit in the realm of the Print Proud Digital Smart strategy that you preach all the time?

Michael Clinton: We pride ourselves on our editorial integrity regardless of platform. With a lot of false influencers that really have no influence, magazine brands and our editors influence consumers to take action.

Samir Husni: Part of me feels that the industry fails a lot in telling its own success story. When I see magazines that are less than 10 years old with circulations of 1.7 million, like Rachael Ray Every Day, Food Network Magazine etc…

Linda Thomas Brooks: And the Magnolia Journal reached one million in around four issues.

Samir Husni: Yes, The Magnolia Journal hit one million after four issues, and many other magazines that are less than 10 years old, or even less than two years old are going to press for a second printing. Why do you think the media industry doesn’t tell those stories more often, rather than constantly reporting on the negatives, the magazines that don’t make it?

Linda Thomas Brooks: It’s a funny thing, isn’t it? Even though I’ve been part of very, very competitive industries before, I’ve never quite seen the same role of the trade press when it comes to eating their own young. (Laughs) And that’s part of what this is, stepping up to say this is the power that our magazine media brands have.

And I’m not ignoring the fact that there are very real business issues and there are very real business disruptions that we’re facing, but every brand is facing business disruption, including digital brands. But we have this strength of heritage that is important to both marketers and consumers. So, I think this is the perfect time to do exactly what you’re describing, which is to step up and say, hey, maybe we’re not perfect, but we’re really damned good.

Michael Clinton: There is a great line from the play “Hamilton.” ‘Who keeps your flame? Who tells your story?’ Every magazine professional has to have the passion to tell the story of our great medium. No one else will do it for us.

Samir Husni: There was a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal about Mashable being up for sale. They lost somewhere around $10 million and they laid off 30 percent of their staff, but no one said digital is dying or digital is fading. In addition to this campaign, how can the magazine industry show consumers and marketers that magazines and magazine media are still, even in this digital age, the true reflectors of American society?

Linda Thomas Brooks: That’s what we’re trying to do here is really start that conversation. This campaign will be going on for months. We’re going to be in 123 of our different magazine media properties in print in the next couple of months, but we’ll be in digital as well. We’re going to be trying to share this message and I hope that the message starts an industry conversation, or continues an industry conversation that I think has already started, which is about brand safety.

The thing I tell people about magazine media brands; they’re more than brand safe, I call them brand edifying. If you’re a marketer, you want to know, not only the safe place for your brand, that you’re not going to be next to something that is completely inappropriate, but that the content is edifying to your brand. That it complements the brand and that consumers feel that it’s part of the package. If you look at Simmons or MRI, all of their qualitative statements, you get all of that with magazine media brands.

So, I think those conversations have started and we’re just trying to amplify that and remind people that these are really critical business issues for marketers demonstrably and again, from outside research, magazines are the best place for that.

Samir Husni: Is there anything that you’d like to add?

Linda Thomas Brooks: I think that the idea of magazines being a shortcut to quality is something that I keep hearkening back to, because I think it’s really important for both consumers and marketers to understand that.

The other thing is that magazines are still invited guests in consumer’s homes. People consume magazines in a whole different way than they consume any other media channel. And I think that’s a really important idea too. If I like you enough to invite you to my home, I have a different relationship with you than somebody I just pass in the street that I don’t know.

If you think about it on a very personal basis that’s what magazines are representing in the marketplace, that invitation from consumers and that gives us a different point of entry in terms of our content, as well as the advertising that comes along. The way I keep phrasing it to people is that magazines are invited guests into consumers’ homes and advertisers get to come along as a plus-one. And that’s very different from every other media channel out there.

It’s going to take a lot of people to change the conversation about this, and I don’t think we should be shy about the power of our brands.

Samir Husni: Thank you both.

Click to check the campaign here…
Read Linda’s current blog on this subject here.
Read Michael’s post on the Hearst’s website here.

h1

Martha Stewart Living: A Recipe For Magazine Success — Stay Authentic To Your Namesake & Pure To Your Audience – The Mr. Magazine™ Interview With Elizabeth Graves, Editor In Chief & Daren Mazzucca, VP/Publisher…

September 28, 2017

“I think we’ve always been offering different, so we have to continue offering different. When Martha speaks about being authentic, it’s when we’re creating original ideas. As editors, we’ve always turned the lens outward, but also had it inside about what we editors were excited about. Yes, we live in a world with trends, but we don’t always follow trends. There are plenty of wonderful magazines that will tell you what’s in fashion and food; what’s in fashion to wear. Our unique differentiating point has always been that we’re looking to the things that inspire us, excite us, and they don’t have to be trends.” Elizabeth Graves…

“We’ve actually enjoyed two years of great advertising growth since the brand has been a part of the Meredith group, from food, packaged goods, appliances; really across the board category growth. I believe there are still opportunities in 2018 to push the envelope with electronics and more. Luxury and beauty, those are areas that we’re focusing in on as well. Meredith has done well, and Martha Stewart has been leading a lot of that push.” Daren Mazzucca…

Martha Stewart Living is reveling in its continued energy and commitment to its audience with a brand new redesign that refreshes the already notable brand. The October issue’s cover features Martha herself in the perfect Autumn setting, complete with burnished colors and pumpkins and gourds. The redesign’s cover line is subtly powerful in its statement that “Fall is Fun.” And expresses in no uncertain terms that so is the magazine.

Elizabeth Graves is editor in chief and Daren Mazzucca, VP/publisher of this signature brand that is one of the many great titles under the Meredith umbrella. Elizabeth has been on Martha’s team for quite a while, having served as editor in chief of Martha Stewart Weddings and an editor at Blueprint magazine, before coming to Martha Stewart Living, where she oversees the editorial and visual content.

Daren Mazzucca joined Meredith in 2010, and today is responsible for advertising sales for both Martha Stewart Living and Martha Stewart Weddings and their related business operations.

I spoke with Elizabeth and Daren recently and we talked about the woman, the magazine, and the brand – Martha Stewart. The passion these two people have for all three is fairly palpable. Their vision is clear and strong, following Martha’s own belief that remaining authentic and vital to your audience is fundamental, and that evolvement breeds new energies.

So, I hope that you enjoy this Mr. Magazine™ interview with two people who know what their brand stands for, and more importantly, who their brand belongs to – its audience…Elizabeth Graves, editor in chief & Daren Mazzucca, VP/publisher, Martha Stewart Living.

But first the sound-bites:

On the many different screen-to-print brands under Meredith’s umbrella and whether they ever feel as though some of their competition is coming from inside (Elizabeth Graves): From our sister publications? I don’t think so. I think we’re all different in different ways. Martha’s book sort of launched her and got her started on TV, and then of course the magazine, because she is just very prolific in content and had a lot to say every month. Then came Martha Stewart Living. Martha has really inspired a lot of people. There’s room in the world for many points of view and Meredith has a stable of lots of really talented and great people behind wonderful publications.

On the business side of having so many great brands under one roof (Daren Mazzucca): From a business point of view, actually it’s a good collaboration, because if a marketer is trying to reach women 25 – 49, all of our sister titles perform well against those targets and we usually excel. And that’s why we’re happy to report some good sales performance for our brands.

On the key to their successful relationship with Martha Stewart and the brand (Elizabeth Graves): The content has always been good, but one of the challenges in the business was MSLO (Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia) itself was a small company. And to have a company like Meredith come along and help us with covering the production costs, and then getting partnered with Daren, who I have gotten along with since day one; I think we have such an affinity for the brand and a respect for Martha, Daren works wonderfully with her, and I know Martha enjoys and respects him so much, it’s been great. So far, so good.

On the key to their successful relationship with Martha Stewart and the brand (Daren Mazzucca): I’ve said this a few times, and you’ve noticed before I started at Midwest Living, and I worked at Better Homes and Gardens; I say that I have one of the best jobs here at Meredith Corporation representing the Martha Stewart brand , working with Elizabeth Graves, and of course working with Martha Stewart, because we’re taking this 27-year-old print brand and really bringing it forward with corporate marketing efforts behind us.

On Martha Stewart herself being on the October issue’s cover and whether that will continue for other covers (Elizabeth Graves): It just seemed like the right thing to do. It was an image that we loved, and I think we’re always looking at what’s going to be our best cover and she was our best cover. There isn’t a “no Martha rule” for the cover; there never has been. It just seemed to really make sense for it, and it was our favorite one, to be honest.

On Martha Stewart herself being on the October issue’s cover and whether that will continue for other covers (Daren Mazzucca): I would also just say, and it’s Elizabeth’s decision, of course, along with Martha Stewart about what images go on the cover of the magazine, but to her point, it made sense. We don’t have a mandate that she’s going to appear in every issue moving forward. But Martha’s hot right now. She’s more cross-platform than ever before and we’re going to capitalize on her renewed popularity.

On what Martha Stewart Living is offering different from other women’s service magazines (Elizabeth Graves): I think we’ve always been offering different, so we have to continue offering different. When Martha speaks about being authentic, it’s when we’re creating original ideas. As editors, we’ve always turned the lens outward, but also had it inside about what we editors were excited about. Yes, we live in a world with trends, but we don’t always follow trends. There are plenty of wonderful magazines that will tell you what’s in fashion and food; what’s in fashion to wear. Our unique differentiating point has always been that we’re looking to the things that inspire us, excite us, and they don’t have to be trends.

On whether her role as editor in chief today is easier or harder as it is ever-changing in this digital age (Elizabeth Graves): I feel very happy to be in this role; I love this job and I’ve loved this magazine from day one. I was an editor in chief of Martha Stewart Weddings for six years before this one, so my role as editor has changed dramatically in that sense. But the world is changing too, and you have to evolve with it. So, yes, is it more challenging – well, we’re always up for a challenge.

On how the business role has evolved (Daren Mazzucca): We just hosted some clients for a tour and a lunch of Martha’s studios and test kitchens, and we were talking about the genesis behind the beef and mushroom meatballs in the October issue. They’re absolutely delicious. As people tend to try and eat healthier and stay with high proteins, but also intermix vegetables, this recipe really is a perfect blend, if you will, of great taste and the unique use of meat and mushrooms. In the food category, that’s some of the things that we’re doing in pushing the envelope. And at the end of the lunch, someone asked Martha what her next cooking would be, and she said that she wanted to learn Japanese cooking. So, she’s constantly learning herself, and she challenges Elizabeth and the editorial team to push the envelope for the brand. And we just follow that from the business side and leverage it.

On how often they talk to Martha (Daren Mazzucca): I speak to Martha probably once or twice a week, either electronically or on the phone. And I see her probably every seven to 10 days in person.

On how often they talk to Martha (Elizabeth Graves): I would say it’s the same for me. There can be a week where I talk to her every day. I never feel out of touch with her. And I physically meet with her as well. There’s just so much to get to.

On how involved Martha Stewart is with the editorial content of the magazine (Elizabeth Graves): I always talk to her about it. Whether it’s new themes for the issue; she’s always full of ideas. I take her to the book and we talk about her column; we talk about the cover; it’s as it has been since day one, she’s very collaborative in her spirit. She’ll call me up when she’s excited about three story ideas.

On any obstacles they’ve had to learn to overcome (Elizabeth Graves): Of course. When you’re working in any collaborative environment, especially with people who want to excel and are creative, there is always push-pull. My approach is always kind of like, may the best argument win. (Laughs) And sometimes I’m passionate and I want to lay down for it, but it’s usually may the best argument win when it comes to surveying our audience and making sure that the content hits all of the notes that we want it to. I guess there are always challenges, but I never see that as a bad thing.

On who the magazine would turn into if struck with a magic wand that made it human – Martha Stewart (Elizabeth Graves): I think it’s Martha and friends. I think there are a lot of people coming out of the magazine now. Our audiences have very big relationships with our editors, they know who Sarah Carey is; they know who Greg Lofts is; they have a relationship with our home editor or Kevin Sharkey, who is always with Martha. There are a lot of people who are Martha in many ways.

On why they felt a redesign of the brand was needed (Elizabeth Graves): It’s by far not a broken brand, and I think one of the things that Daren and I really gave thought to when we began working as a team almost two years ago, was that this is a magazine that has a great audience and is very healthy. But what we’ve always done is evolve. And one of the things that has attracted people to this brand is that we’re always striving to stay ahead and to continue to inspire people. So, I don’t think you can take the tactic of just letting things be and hoping you’ll continue to get the same effect doing the same thing all of the time.

On whether new advertisers have come onboard since the redesign (Daren Mazzucca): Yes, we’ve actually enjoyed two years of great advertising growth since the brand has been a part of the Meredith group, from food, packaged goods, appliances; really across the board category growth. I believe there are still opportunities in 2018 to push the envelope with electronics and more.

On what he would have tattooed upon his brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about him (Daren Mazzucca): For me it would be work smart, have fun, and make money. In that order. (Laughs) It’s a mantra of sorts.

On what she would have tattooed upon her brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about her (Elizabeth Graves): That’s a hard one. I think above all, be kind. No matter what.

On what someone would find her doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at her home (Elizabeth Graves): It could be all of the above, but you would definitely be greeted by my young son, James, who might make you play with his trains because I play with trains every night. And definitely cooking, and being with my family. They’re one thing I definitely love coming home to every night.

On what someone would find him doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at his home (Daren Mazzucca): I may have told you this before; I have five beautiful children, so when I’m home I love to unwind with them. Some of them are in college, so we Facetime and we chat socially, and that’s where I spend my greatest moments. It keeps me highly motivated when I return to the office.

On what keeps them up at night (Elizabeth Graves): When I drink coffee after 3:00 p.m. (Laughs)

On what keeps them up at night (Daren Mazzucca): What keeps me up at night is really staying current in this cross-platform world that we live in. We have to be knowledgeable in print, digital, social, and there’s a lot to learn and it keeps us motivated and that’s what keeps me up at night.

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Elizabeth Graves, editor in chief, & Daren Mazzucca, VP/publisher, Martha Stewart Living.

Samir Husni: Martha Stewart was one of the first brands that came from the screen to print 28 years ago, before it became a trend in publishing. And today, within the same company there is Rachael Ray, allrecipes.com has become a magazine, The Magnolia Journal, which is the Chip and Joanna Gaines’ brand that also came from the screen to print; how does it feel for the both of you to be working for the same company with all of these great brands? Does it feel as though you have inside competition?

Elizabeth Graves: From our sister publications? I don’t think so. I think we’re all different in different ways. Martha’s book sort of launched her and got her started on TV, and then of course the magazine, because she is just very prolific in content and had a lot to say every month. Then came Martha Stewart Living. Martha has really inspired a lot of people. There’s room in the world for many points of view and Meredith has a stable of lots of really talented and great people behind wonderful publications.

Daren Mazzucca: I agree.

Samir Husni: And from a business point of view, Daren?

Daren Mazzucca: From a business point of view, actually it’s a good collaboration, because if a marketer is trying to reach women 25 – 49, all of our sister titles perform well against those targets and we usually excel. And that’s why we’re happy to report some good sales performance for our brands.

Samir Husni: The eternal question that everybody keeps asking is until the Martha Stewart brand came over to Meredith, it had a few rocky relationships; a few editors in chief; a few publishers; what makes your relationship, the two of you, with Martha Stewart, work? There is a simpatico between you, everything is calmer, fresher; she’s back on the cover this month; what’s the key for your successful relationship with her?

Elizabeth Graves: I’ve worked with Martha since 2005, on a number of different publications. When I took over the editor’s position almost two years ago, it’s not that I think I was that much more brilliant than the people in front of me, it was quite different than that. There has been talented editors, as you point out, and great publishers behind it.

The content has always been good, but one of the challenges in the business was MSLO (Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia) itself was a small company. And to have a company like Meredith come along and help us with covering the production costs, and then getting partnered with Daren, who I have gotten along with since day one; I think we have such an affinity for the brand and a respect for Martha, Daren works wonderfully with her, and I know Martha enjoys and respects him so much, it’s been great. So far, so good.

And we’re a good team and we have a lot of fun doing what we do. The brand, Martha Stewart Living, is a fun one. It’s all of the things that people who work on it are naturally into. There’s a lot of great excitement for it and we’ve been having a good time doing it.

Daren Mazzucca: I’ve said this a few times, and you’ve noticed before I started at Midwest Living, and I worked at Better Homes and Gardens; I say that I have one of the best jobs here at Meredith Corporation representing the Martha Stewart brand , working with Elizabeth Graves, and of course working with Martha Stewart, because we’re taking this 27-year-old print brand and really bringing it forward with corporate marketing efforts behind us.

When we develop a Martha Stewart integrated program for an advertiser, we can scale that if they want to have additional reach. We can add our sister titles in, like Better Homes and Gardens or Shape Magazine. The idea might initiate with the great content leader here at our brand, but we can scale them across the Meredith portfolio. I absolutely adore this brand. We were competitors many years ago when she started it, and it’s wonderful and refreshing to be leading it now.

Samir Husni: As you’re leading the brand, I’ve noticed that you’ve brought back Martha to the cover. Is that going to be a recurring theme, with her on every cover, or was this just something you’re doing for October?

Elizabeth Graves: It just seemed like the right thing to do. It was an image that we loved, and I think we’re always looking at what’s going to be our best cover and she was our best cover. There isn’t a “no Martha rule” for the cover; there never has been. It just seemed to really make sense for it, and it was our favorite one, to be honest.

We really just loved it and it felt right, because when we were looking at refreshing the magazine, my whole process for being on this brand has been to look back at what made us great in the beginning, and keep reimagining that. Keep evolving it. And she’s still very much a part of this; this is Martha Stewart Living. It goes full circle for me to have her on the cover for the redesign.

Daren Mazzucca: I would also just say, and it’s Elizabeth’s decision, of course, along with Martha Stewart about what images go on the cover of the magazine, but to her point, it made sense. We don’t have a mandate that she’s going to appear in every issue moving forward. But Martha’s hot right now. She’s more cross-platform than ever before and we’re going to capitalize on her renewed popularity.

Samir Husni: As we talk about that renewed popularity, I read Martha’s quote in the current issue of Forbes Magazine, where she’s talking about being authentic and being vital for your audience. How are we seeing this new genre of women’s service magazines competing with the legacy ones? Elizabeth, from an editorial point of view, what are you offering different?

Elizabeth Graves: I think we’ve always been offering different, so we have to continue offering different. When Martha speaks about being authentic, it’s when we’re creating original ideas. As editors, we’ve always turned the lens outward, but also had it inside about what we editors were excited about. Yes, we live in a world with trends, but we don’t always follow trends. There are plenty of wonderful magazines that will tell you what’s in fashion and food; what’s in fashion to wear. Our unique differentiating point has always been that we’re looking to the things that inspire us, excite us, and they don’t have to be trends.

Samir Husni: Daren just mentioned that he has the best job at Meredith, and his job became much easier because he can use the competitive set within the company. Elizabeth, is your job as editor in chief easier or harder as the role these days is ever-changing?

Elizabeth Graves: I feel very happy to be in this role; I love this job and I’ve loved this magazine from day one. I was an editor in chief of Martha Stewart Weddings for six years before this one, so my role as editor has changed dramatically in that sense. But the world is changing too, and you have to evolve with it. So, yes, is it more challenging – well, we’re always up for a challenge.

I do feel very lucky that I come to work and I’m very inspired by everyone I work with, and inspired by Martha. The content we cover is fun for me. I’m in meetings and find myself thinking that I want to cook that recipe we’re talking about tonight, so it’s things that I use and that I do. Yes, the business has its challenges, but I feel very lucky to be a part of Meredith and have a lot of help and support on that front. And we also work with a great, talented team of editors who come up with great ideas every day.

Samir Husni: And from a business perspective, Daren?

Daren Mazzucca: Well, you mentioned the October issue, and we just hosted some clients for a tour and a lunch of Martha’s studios and test kitchens, and we were talking about the genesis behind the beef and mushroom meatballs in the October issue. They’re absolutely delicious. As people tend to try and eat healthier and stay with high proteins, but also intermix vegetables, this recipe really is a perfect blend, if you will, of great taste and the unique use of meat and mushrooms.

In the food category, that’s some of the things that we’re doing in pushing the envelope. And at the end of the lunch, someone asked Martha what her next cooking would be, and she said that she wanted to learn Japanese cooking. So, she’s constantly learning herself, and she challenges Elizabeth and the editorial team to push the envelope for the brand. And we just follow that from the business side and leverage it, because usually the advertisers, whether it be a spice manufacturer or others, they’re also on the same pulse right behind us, so it’s a beautiful thing.

Samir Husni: How often do you talk with Martha? Is it daily or weekly? Both on the editorial and advertising side.

Daren Mazzucca: I speak to Martha probably once or twice a week, either electronically or on the phone. And I see her probably every seven to 10 days in person.

Elizabeth Graves: I would say it’s the same for me. There can be a week where I talk to her every day. I never feel out of touch with her. And I physically meet with her as well. There’s just so much to get to.

Daren Mazzucca: We take her out on a lot of sales calls too. Elizabeth and I had her in Chicago last year, and we’ve taken her to Detroit to see startups, to align with our “American Made” initiative, which is very important to Martha and to the brand.

Readers want to know about entrepreneurs as they consider their own careers, so we’ve taken Martha out. We’ve also brought her to clients, such as General Motors Corporation and others. We spend a lot of time with her. I often say we have dual citizenship; we’re Meredith employees in representing the Martha Stewart brand, but we have full access to her offices and our test kitchens are located in their studios and address location.

Samir Husni: Elizabeth, how involved is she in the editorial content of the magazine?

Elizabeth Graves: I always talk to her about it. Whether it’s new themes for the issue; she’s always full of ideas. I take her to the book and we talk about her column; we talk about the cover; it’s as it has been since day one, she’s very collaborative in her spirit. She’ll call me up when she’s excited about three story ideas. She generally gets excited about things, and I think she gets us excited about covering them, because usually what we try to do with every story is learn something. So, when she’s wanting to learn about the next thing, that excitement is infectious. And it often turns into a great story.

Daren Mazzucca: I’ll add one comment here. Elizabeth mentioned her tenure with Martha Stewart, both on Weddings and she originally worked on the Blueprint brand as editor, so she has Martha Stewart DNA in her blood and I think Martha trusts her and her vision, and the editorial vision of the team to lay out what we’re going to produce content-wise moving forward.

Samir Husni: Even the best-matched DNA, every now and then they have struggles or difficulties. Has it been a total walk in a rose garden or have there been obstacles you’ve had to learn to overcome?

Elizabeth Graves: Of course. When you’re working in any collaborative environment, especially with people who want to excel and are creative, there is always push-pull. My approach is always kind of like, may the best argument win. (Laughs) And sometimes I’m passionate and I want to lay down for it, but it’s usually may the best argument win when it comes to surveying our audience and making sure that the content hits all of the notes that we want it to. I guess there are always challenges, but I never see that as a bad thing.

Sometimes you can go into a story meeting and I’ve worked with some of the most talented creative directors and I think when people are all pushing for a story to be its very best, it usually gets better.

Daren Mazzucca: I agree.

Elizabeth Graves: I like that idea of swimming in a fast heat, because if everyone is swimming fast, you usually swim fast yourself.

Daren Mazzucca: I’ve seen this happen, Samir, I’ve seen the idea, as Elizabeth mentioned, start with Martha and then our editors make it better. I’ve seen the ideas come from our marketing department and then Elizabeth and the content team make them better, and that’s good. Sometimes you really have to look at things from a different perspective to make it a stronger, better, more compelling story. We’ve had a really good go with Martha for these past two and a half years we’ve been together.

Samir Husni: If I give you a magic wand and you strike the magazine with it, and a human being takes its place, who would that be? Martha Stewart coming out from the pages, or maybe her distant cousin?

Elizabeth Graves: I think it’s Martha and friends. I think there are a lot of people coming out of the magazine now. Our audiences have very big relationships with our editors, they know who Sarah Carey is; they know who Greg Lofts is; they have a relationship with our home editor or Kevin Sharkey, who is always with Martha. There are a lot of people who are Martha in many ways.

And I think our editors live the Martha life. We really join in the pursuit of a life made better, in terms of making our own homes better, our cooking better. So, I think you see a lot of “we” are Martha coming out of the Martha brand now. I would say it’s Martha and friends.

Samir Husni: Why the refresh of the brand?

Elizabeth Graves: It’s by far not a broken brand, and I think one of the things that Daren and I really gave thought to when we began working as a team almost two years ago, was that this is a magazine that has a great audience and is very healthy. But what we’ve always done is evolve. And one of the things that has attracted people to this brand is that we’re always striving to stay ahead and to continue to inspire people. So, I don’t think you can take the tactic of just letting things be and hoping you’ll continue to get the same effect doing the same thing all of the time.

We know that our audience is full of highly-achieving women, and they want to be pushed. They want to open up that magazine and have an experience. They still expect to see new photographers and beautiful images, so that’s where we started. Let’s reorganize it first; let’s refresh it; and then let’s redesign it. And do it in a way that is very true to our DNA. And it continues to really ignite readers too.

Since I started reading the magazine in high school, it was my mother’s magazine, Martha has always made me want to do things. And I think we have to keep that energy going. We have loyal readers who have been with us for nearly 27 years now, and we want to talk to our new audience, it’s so fun to see new readers discover Martha, but we also want to appeal to the people we’ve had for a long time. So, it’s been a lot of fun, and the art team, with our design director, Jaspal Riyait; they just knocked it out of the park with the redesign. It really feels right and we’ve gotten a great response already.

Samir Husni: Daren, are you getting new advertisers that were not onboard before the redesign?

Daren Mazzucca: Yes, we’ve actually enjoyed two years of great advertising growth since the brand has been a part of the Meredith group, from food, packaged goods, appliances; really across the board category growth. I believe there are still opportunities in 2018 to push the envelope with electronics and more. Luxury and beauty, those are areas that we’re focusing in on as well. Meredith has done well, and Martha Stewart has been leading a lot of that push.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Daren Mazzucca: For me it would be work smart, have fun, and make money. In that order. (Laughs) It’s a mantra of sorts.

Elizabeth Graves: That’s a hard one. I think above all, be kind. No matter what.

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of wine; reading a magazine; cooking; watching TV; or something else?

Elizabeth Graves: It could be all of the above, but you would definitely be greeted by my young son, James, who might make you play with his trains because I play with trains every night. And definitely cooking, and being with my family. They’re one thing I definitely love coming home to every night.

Samir Husni: And Daren?

Daren Mazzucca: I may have told you this before; I have five beautiful children, so when I’m home I love to unwind with them. Some of them are in college, so we Facetime and we chat socially, and that’s where I spend my greatest moments. It keeps me highly motivated when I return to the office.

Samir Husni: What keeps you both up at night?

Elizabeth Graves: When I drink coffee after 3:00 p.m. (Laughs)

Daren Mazzucca: What keeps me up at night is really staying current in this cross-platform world that we live in. We have to be knowledgeable in print, digital, social, and there’s a lot to learn and it keeps us motivated and that’s what keeps me up at night.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

PRINT PROUD, DIGITAL SMART. The Magazine Innovation Center’s ACT 8 Experience – April 17-20, 2018. Save The Date

September 27, 2017

PRINT. The cornerstone of magazines and magazine media.

DIGITAL. The portal by which we all communicate these days and times.

PRINT & DIGITAL. A winning combination that has only been at odds with each other because of our own close-mindedness.

Like most preconceptions, the idea that digital media was born into this world to destroy print is preposterous. The blame game has gone on long enough. The problem is digital and print media have not been properly introduced to each other. And whose fault is that? Certainly not the words and pixels that make up each platform. No, the fault belongs to the people who love both mediums, but who are determined to keep wedging the divide even deeper into their differences. Namely, us, folks.

This next April 17—20, 2018, the Magazine Innovation Center at the Meek School of Journalism and New Media on the campus of the University of Mississippi will hold its annual ACT Experience. ACT stands for Amplify, Clarify and Testify on and about the future of print in a digital age. This time around we’re up to number eight, and it’s going to be an eye-opener. The theme of the ACT 8 Experience is: Print Proud, Digital Smart. And that’s exactly the phrase we all have to start living by if we want our magazines to be successful in the 21st century.

In an interview I did a few months ago with Michael Clinton, President, Marketing and Publishing Director for Hearst Magazines, I took deep notice of a comment that he made during our conversation. When I asked him where he thought Hearst’s future was heading, part of his answer was, “Obviously, we believe in our core product—which is print. Why do we believe so strongly? It’s because the consumer believes so strongly in it. Then, of course, like everyone else, have a very significant build-out on all digital and social platforms. All that has to run parallel to our print issues. We want our brands living everywhere. I think that’s a multiplatform approach, with the core always being very important.”

So, basically “Print Proud, Digital Smart.” In fact, I give Michael credit for coining ACT 8’s theme. And he’s absolutely right. If you want to succeed in today’s world in the magazine business, you have to be Print Proud & Digital Smart. It’s not a choice, it’s an absolute. And if you want to hear and learn more about this highly evocative concept, make plans today to join us in Oxford, Miss. for the ACT 8 Experience, April 17-20, 2018. You won’t be disappointed.

More information about the ACT 8 Experience will be added here in the upcoming weeks and months. Stay tuned!

h1

Tom Harty, President And COO, Meredith, To Samir “Mr. Magazine™” Husni: “What We’re Seeing At Meredith Is That The Demand For Print Products From Consumers Is Still Very Strong,” The Mr. Magazine™ Interview…

September 25, 2017

“Consumers and women still love the printed format to turn to for inspiration and for more of that lean-back experience. And what we look for more with digital is as a utility to help them to do something in the short-term. So, inspiration versus utility, as I like to say.” Tom Harty…

“When you type into a Google box or a Google search, and you’re specifically looking for chicken dinners or chicken tacos, or swordfish, you know what you’re looking for, at least to start. You’re looking for a recipe around something, but there’s still an inspirational part of curation that our editors can form. So, we started Allrecipes Magazine, where we could curate all of that great content that we have in the back of the database online and bring it forward to inspire. Now, you have an extremely successful magazine built out from a digital-only brand.” Tom Harty…

“You’re going to see us continue to make organic investments, especially in our digital products into next year. We’re also on the acquisition trail, and we’re looking for both organic growth, where we’re making investments in growing organically in the brands and the product lines that we have, and we’re also looking at opportunities to grow our business through acquisitions. And that could be print products, digital products, or broadcast products on the other side of the business.” Tom Harty

From Eating Well to Allrecipes, Martha Stewart Living to Better Homes and Gardens; and more recently, Chip and Joanna Gaines’ The Magnolia Journal, Meredith has been serving their readers with great content for 115 years. And of course, with many, many titles in between. Tom Harty is president and chief operating officer of the company, and under his leadership has played a key role in the development and execution of Meredith’s strategic initiatives, helping Meredith increase its connection to the American consumer through growth in magazine audience, online traffic, brand licensing and marketing services.

Tom’s career in magazines and magazine media is rich with experience, having been senior vice president, general manager for The Golf Digest Companies, a division of Advance Magazines. His broad media company experience includes key leadership positions with TV Guide, where he served as vice president and publisher; and Reader’s Digest, where he was advertising director. So, Tom knows a thing or two about magazines.

I spoke with Tom recently and we talked about his strategic vision for the company. Tom’s plans include continuing to gear great content toward women and to give them that content in whatever way they want to consume it, from the legacy print format to all of their new digital products. He said the demand for print from the consumer was still very strong; and of course, one shining example of that is Better Homes and Gardens, which is still living up to its 7.6 million copy circulation that it had 20 years ago. And from organic growth to acquisitions, Tom is committed to continuing the robust present and very bright future that Meredith works very hard to maintain.

So, I hope that you enjoy this interesting and informative conversation with a man who uses his vast experience to propel Meredith forward in both print and digital, and strives to expand the company’s vision even more, the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Tom Harty, president and chief operating officer, Meredith.

But first the sound-bites:

On his strategic vision for Meredith in today’s 21st century: It really hasn’t changed from what we’ve done in the past. We create great content that’s geared toward American women, and we’ve been doing that for 115 years. And that’s our strategic vision. I think that what we want to do as we change is create that content however she wants to consume it, so obviously that is both in a legacy print format and in all of our new digital formats.

On how he strikes a balance between Meredith’s digital approach and the reality of print today: What we’re seeing is the demand for print products from consumers is still very strong. We like to say that 20 years ago we printed 7.6 million copies of Better Homes and Gardens each month, and today we print 7.6 million copies per month too. And not a lot has changed from that perspective. About 90 percent of our circulation is subscription versus newsstand, so as the newsstand troubles have been going on out there, we’ve been less affected by that. Consumers and women still love the printed format to turn to for inspiration and for more of that lean-back experience. And what we look for more with digital is as a utility to help them to do something in the short-term.

On whether they’re looking for a new strategic model when it comes to digital advertising that isn’t similar to the print model: From an advertising perspective, where we’ve been having success digitally is that we have some proprietary products digitally that are digital-ad products. A company called Selectable Media a few years ago, that enables us to gate content, where you might have to watch a video to completion to get our content. So, we’re asking the consumer to do something.

On how he shows his love, or tough love, to both his legacy magazine brands and those products that were already brands before they joined the Meredith team: That’s a good question, and I think it’s a good point. We’re always evaluating where we’re putting our resources for growth. That’s the struggle that people at the top of the house of media companies have to make, and have been making for long periods of time. You can’t treat every single brand, or child, as you put it, always equally. That’s not to say that this doesn’t change all of the time.

On what he hopes to accomplish one year from now: I think you’re going to see us continue to make organic investments, especially in our digital products into next year. We’re also on the acquisition trail, and we’re looking for both organic growth, where we’re making investments in growing organically in the brands and the product lines that we have, and we’re also looking at opportunities to grow our business through acquisitions. And that could be print products, digital products, or broadcast products on the other side of the business.

On a Rolling Stone acquisition: I wouldn’t say that Rolling Stone would fit our current strategy, that’s what I would comment. It’s a great brand, it’s been around for a long period of time, but it probably would not fit our strategy to look at that brand.

On whether he thinks the recent partnerships many publishers have made with celebrity brands is a new business model or one that began in the ‘80s with Martha Stewart and Time Inc.: I wouldn’t say that it’s a new business model. When Martha, or whoever, starts things from scratch, they’re looking to find the experts that are out there to help them. So, I think there’s an opportunity maybe to do some more of these types of things.

On whether he thinks the future for magazines is a more targeted approach, or there is still a desire from consumers for large, mass magazines like Better Homes and Gardens: I think that there’s a place for some of these large-scale magazines to still exist. I see the demand for Better Homes and Gardens and it’s astonishing. But it really strikes at a strong brand; it strikes at consumers who are looking for that type of content on a broad scale. So, it exists. I don’t know if we’ll ever see a magazine from scratch reach that kind of scale again, I just don’t know. That’s a good question, if there will ever be new brands that will come out and do that.

On the question someone asked him once when he was publisher of TV Guide on why he provided the TV listings free online: When I was the publisher at TV Guide and I was getting the furnace replaced in my old house that I’d bought, and the oil sales guy asked me if I was the publisher of TV Guide, why was I giving the TV listings online for free. That was a moment in time. I’ll never forget that; it was a very strategic question. And at the time, I don’t think we had the answer.

On whether he believes they have the answer now: The utility has changed for a magazine. I think that was more of a technology change. I think the utility of finding what’s on television has changed, and I believe that was something that TV Guide saw coming, but yes, I think we have the answer now.

On what he would have tattooed upon his brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about him: When I think about people that I’ve worked with and what they will think about Tom Harty, I believe that it would be that he was a decisive, fair leader during a time in the media business of great disruption. That’s what I think about myself. That I make decisive decisions and I’m very fair about it in my leadership style. And I think that’s what people would say about Tom Harty.

On what someone would find him doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at his home: You’d probably find me winding down with my wife and I in the kitchen preparing dinner, and doing it together. And me doing all of the cleanup, just helping her out and enjoying a nice evening together.

On what keeps him up at night: What keeps me up at night is what’s kept a lot of people up at night and that is, as this business goes through tremendous transformation and change, what are the new things technology-wise or competition-wise that I’m not thinking about? That’s what keeps me up at night. You can address the things that you know about, but it’s harder to address the unknown.

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Tom Harty, president and chief operating officer, Meredith.

Samir Husni: Congratulations on the many successes that Meredith has been having with its magazines this year. I see from your bio that Meredith gives you much credit for your leadership when it comes to those successes and your strategic vision for the company. Can you tell me about that strategic vision you have for Meredith today, in the 21st century?

Tom Harty: It really hasn’t changed from what we’ve done in the past. We create great content that’s geared toward American women, and we’ve been doing that for 115 years. And that’s our strategic vision. I think that what we want to do as we change is create that content however she wants to consume it, so obviously that is both in a legacy print format and in all of our new digital formats. I always like to tell people, it’s not one or the other, it’s combined for us, so we continue to focus on our great heritage of print products, which women still enjoy thoroughly. And we’re also focused on the new, emerging digital properties and digital utilities that we can format for her going into the future.

Samir Husni: You’re still investing a lot in print. This year alone we’ve seen the reengineering or refreshing of Parents, Martha Stewart Living, Family Circle, and Better Homes and Gardens. And you’re moving forward with digital as well. How do you strike that balance between the digital approach you’re taking and the reality of print today in this digital age?

Tom Harty: What we’re seeing is the demand for print products from consumers is still very strong. We like to say that 20 years ago we printed 7.6 million copies of Better Homes and Gardens each month, and today we print 7.6 million copies per month too. And not a lot has changed from that perspective. About 90 percent of our circulation is subscription versus newsstand, so as the newsstand troubles have been going on out there, we’ve been less affected by that.

Consumers and women still love the printed format to turn to for inspiration and for more of that lean-back experience. And what we look for more with digital is as a utility to help them to do something in the short-term. So, inspiration versus utility, as I like to say.

But to your point, the headwinds that we’ve been facing are that advertisers have a lot more places to spend their money and there are a lot more impressions being created out there in digital and mobile. That’s the issue that we’re facing. At Meredith, we don’t see a tremendous consumer issue, when it comes to demand for our magazines. We have an advertiser issue that we’ve been facing, and we’ve been planning for that and figuring out ways to grow around that.

And we’ve talked about this years ago; when we launched Allrecipes Magazine, I don’t think there were too many people out there who thought it would be successful, taking a digital-only brand that was started online as allrecipes.com, where it’s user-generated content that we obviously give back to consumers online, and give them that utility of finding a recipe that they’re looking for.

But we also felt like when you type into a Google box or a Google search, and you’re specifically looking for chicken dinners or chicken tacos, or swordfish, you know what you’re looking for, at least to start. You’re looking for a recipe around something, but there’s still an inspirational part of curation that our editors can form. So, we started Allrecipes Magazine, where we could curate all of that great content that we have in the back of the database online and bring it forward to inspire. Now, you have an extremely successful magazine built out from a digital-only brand.

A year ago, one of the most exciting things that I’ve seen in my 30+ years in the business is the Magnolia Journal. We had the opportunity to have a discussion with Chip and Joanna Gaines, of the “Fixer Upper” and the Magnolia brand, and in 60 days we put out a newsstand-only test and when it came back, we had to go back to press in the first week and double the print run. We sold over 75 percent of the copies in a short period of time at $10 a pop.

And that’s when we knew we had a runaway success, and now we’re selling subscriptions and now we’re going to have a one million circulation magazine in less than 12 months. It’s the most profitable magazine launch in the history of the company in 115 years. So, there’s a great print product, great brand, great editors working with that celebrity to put together a product that consumers would react to and you can’t argue with the success and demand for that print product.

You asked about the balance; we’re not giving up on the print products because the utility of print is still in demand from consumers. But at the same time we’re building out a digital business that creates a great utility in finding tools to help consumers do that also.

Samir Husni: Recently, I heard that the chief brand officer at P&G said that the average digital ad viewing is 1.7 seconds, and he’s challenging the industry to find another way for digital advertising. As you develop your digital footprint, are you also trying to find a new, strategic model that isn’t similar to the print model?

Tom Harty: From an advertising perspective, where we’ve been having success digitally is that we have some proprietary products digitally that are digital-ad products. A company called Selectable Media a few years ago, that enables us to gate content, where you might have to watch a video to completion to get our content. So, we’re asking the consumer to do something.

And we’re able to take our proprietary data and overlay that with other things. We bought a company called Couponix that enables us to target at retail prices, because half of our traffic for allrecipes happens in retail stores, as people are searching for recipes. So, we’re building out proprietary ad products that give advertisers more value. I think some advertisers are questioning some of the traditional banner advertising; were they getting the best bang for their buck.

So, as we aggregate these great audiences and give them this utility to get at our content, how can we really engage these advertisers in that conversation, where they can get a return for the dollars they’re investing in that. The digital industry is still always evolving and looking for the right mix of , where it’s not interfering with the user experience, but getting those advertisers’ messages across.

I’ve been in this business for a long time, whenever we did unaided research with editors and our subscribers over the years, we’d do focus groups, and this goes back 25 years ago. I used to sit through these and the editors would be behind the glass and the readers would be on the other side, and the facilitator would pass out the magazines and they’d tell the readers to point out the editorial that they really loved, and it used to drive the editors crazy, because they used to point at advertising. The advertising was part of the experience. That is a great part of the form factor of print for advertising. And I think digital is still making strides to get that same connection with consumers, where it’s not interfering with their experience.

Samir Husni: I feel like you may be the father of too many children, and some of them are very well known children, such as Martha Stewart Living, Rachael Ray, and the Gaines couple. How do you show your love, or your tough love, to legacy brands, like Better Homes and Gardens, Parents; and then all of these brands that stand on their own?

Tom Harty: That’s a good question, and I think it’s a good point. We’re always evaluating where we’re putting our resources for growth. That’s the struggle that people at the top of the house of media companies have to make, and have been making for long periods of time. You can’t treat every single brand, or child, as you put it, always equally. That’s not to say that this doesn’t change all of the time.

We’ve been able to build out a great brand portfolio in recent years, and made some great additions like, as you mentioned, Martha Stewart, Shape, Racheal Ray, and Eating Well. We’ve been able to take advantage of the efficiencies of Meredith, from being what we think is one of the best, if not the best, operators in the business, and take advantage of the efficiencies of a bigger media company with our back office based in Des Moines, Iowa.

But we can also allocate some of those savings, as you would call it, being part of a bigger company, where they’re independent on their own, and reinvest in the brand. So, it’s always a battle, but we always have to keep an eye on where we think we can get the best return for our investment and for our shareholders in the future. We’re constantly waging that kind of allocation battle.

You’ve known in the past where we’ve made tougher decisions on brands like Ladies’ Home Journal or More, or we combined Fitness with Shape, where we make a bigger bet on what we think is a different way to allocate it, and stop allocating to certain brands. It’s not an easy decision to make, but we’ve made that in the past.

Samir Husni: When we look at the Meredith portfolio today, under your leadership, if you and I are speaking one year from now, what would you hope to tell me that you had accomplished in 2017?

Tom Harty: I think you’re going to see us continue to make organic investments, especially in our digital products into next year. We’re also on the acquisition trail, and we’re looking for both organic growth, where we’re making investments in growing organically in the brands and the product lines that we have, and we’re also looking at opportunities to grow our business through acquisitions. And that could be print products, digital products, or broadcast products on the other side of the business.

There are a number of things that we’re constantly looking at, so we’re not shying away from any area, but I always say that it has to, number one, fit our strategy for an acquisition, and then it has to be for sale; you have to have a seller that actually wants to sell something, and it has to be the right price. There’s a sifter that we put things through.

I think that throughout the industry, from print to digital to broadcast, all are ripe for consolidation, and as Meredith has stated, we’re going to be a consolidator, and you’ve seen us look at that and do that over the last few years. And we’re going to continue to do that, while at the same time, making investments in our core organic business.

Samir Husni: Without going into what’s up for sale now, can you rule out a Rolling Stone purchase?

Tom Harty: I wouldn’t say that Rolling Stone would fit our current strategy, that’s what I would comment. It’s a great brand, it’s been around for a long period of time, but it probably would not fit our strategy to look at that brand.

That’s not to say that we wouldn’t look at making investments in men’s brands. If you look at our portfolio, we’re more dominant on the women’s side of the business. I think the current number is we reach 112 million women in the United States on a monthly basis. I believe there’s somewhere around 1,920 million adult women in the U.S., so we’re fast approaching a saturation of how we reach women. So, we might look at more men-focused titles in the future.

Samir Husni: When you look at that portfolio and everything you’ve done so far, do you think that with Meredith, Hearst, and recently, Condé Nast, starting partnerships, such as Meredith and the Gaines couple, Hearst and The Pioneer Woman and Dr. Oz; do you think that’s a reinvention of a business model, or is it something that Martha Stewart actually introduced in the 1980s with Time Inc.?

Tom Harty: I wouldn’t say that it’s a new business model. When Martha, or whoever, starts things from scratch, they’re looking to find the experts that are out there to help them. So, I think there’s an opportunity maybe to do some more of these types of things. It’s us and Hearst that’s kind of really active in that.

We did something with Condé Nast with House & Garden. We’re able to produce content very efficiently and House & Garden is a brand that we think is fantastic, and so does Condé Nast. They decided to stop the print brand, and we’ve come back with it and have our second issue on the newsstand, and it’s been successful. So, there are always models that we’re looking at, even helping each other. Here we are working with Condé Nast on a licensing and profitability share for House & Garden.

So, it’s not a new concept, but I think in this day and age launching a magazine for an independent celebrity or independent company, is more difficult. It makes it much more efficient for a bigger media company to help them do that.

Samir Husni: In your career, you’ve worked at three of the largest magazines in this country: TV Guide, Reader’s Digest, and Better Homes and Gardens. So, you’ve seen the huge magazines and their huge circulations. And you just shared that Better Homes and Gardens is still the largest, non-membership magazine in this country. But do you think the future for magazines is a more targeted approach, or is there still a desire from consumers for these large, mass magazines?

Tom Harty: I think that there’s a place for some of these large-scale magazines to still exist. I see the demand for Better Homes and Gardens and it’s astonishing. But it really strikes at a strong brand; it strikes at consumers who are looking for that type of content on a broad scale. So, it exists.

I don’t know if we’ll ever see a magazine from scratch reach that kind of scale again, I just don’t know. That’s a good question, if there will ever be new brands that will come out and do that. I don’t know if the Magnolia brand will ever reach that kind of scale; I’m just not sure.

Samir Husni: I remember meeting you once and you told me a story about your furnace in the basement of your home and the guy who came to fix it. I think at the time the story took place you were at TV Guide. Do you remember that?

Tom Harty: You’re exactly right. I used that example of when I was the publisher at TV Guide and I was getting the furnace replaced in my old house that I’d bought, and the oil sales guy asked me if I was the publisher of TV Guide, why was I giving the TV listings online for free. That was a moment in time. I’ll never forget that; it was a very strategic question. And at the time, I don’t think we had the answer.

Samir Husni: Do you have the answer now?

Tom Harty: The utility has changed for a magazine. I think that was more of a technology change. I think the utility of finding what’s on television has changed, and I believe that was something that TV Guide saw coming, but yes, I think we have the answer now.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Tom Harty: That’s a good question. When I think about people that I’ve worked with and what they will think about Tom Harty, I believe that it would be that he was a decisive, fair leader during a time in the media business of great disruption. That’s what I think about myself. That I make decisive decisions and I’m very fair about it in my leadership style. And I think that’s what people would say about Tom Harty.

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of wine; reading a magazine; cooking; watching TV; or something else?

Tom Harty: You’d probably find me winding down with my wife and I in the kitchen preparing dinner, and doing it together. And me doing all of the cleanup, just helping her out and enjoying a nice evening together.

Samir Husni: My typical last question; what keeps you up at night?

Tom Harty: What keeps me up at night is what’s kept a lot of people up at night and that is, as this business goes through tremendous transformation and change, what are the new things technology-wise or competition-wise that I’m not thinking about? That’s what keeps me up at night. You can address the things that you know about, but it’s harder to address the unknown. And that’s what keeps me staring at the ceiling at night, the things that I’m missing.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

Venture South Magazine: Connecting The Dots Regionally For People Passionate About Hometown Destinations And All That Goes With It – The Mr. Magazine™ Interview With Jason Niblett, Co-Founder & Publisher…

September 21, 2017

A Mr. Magazine™ Launch Story…

“There was such a desire for something like Venture South in Laurel (Miss.). There are so many dynamic things happening here right now. We have the HGTV series, “Home Town,” that’s filming its second season. And last year we had the Matthew McConaughey movie, “Free State of Jones,” which is about our county. Once we announced the magazine, it has just been insanely popular. It’s crazy.” Jason Niblett…

It’s always uplifting to Mr. Magazine™ to find that the entrepreneurial spirit is still alive and well in this country, especially when it comes to the magazine business. Venture South Magazine is a hometown publication, but with large regional possibilities. And one of its co-founders and publisher, is not oblivious to that fact. He sees the potential of this magazine reaching far beyond the city limits of Laurel, Miss.

Jason Niblett is a University of Mississippi graduate and a newspaper man that has stepped off the broadsheet and onto the slick and glossy pages of a monthly magazine. And he is ready to move it as far as possible into the marketplace.

I spoke with Jason recently and we talked about this hometown endeavor that has suddenly found itself with a noticeable popularity and readership. And no one could be happier about it than its publisher. Having planned to offer it free to the public, depending on advertisements for its survival, Jason and his two other partners in the magazine, were shocked when they found themselves with about 200 subscriptions before the first issue even came off the presses. But that kind of shock is a good thing to new magazine publishers and owners.

So, grab your glass of sweet tea and come along with Mr. Magazine™ as we “Venture South” and learn about the spirit of one entrepreneur that just won’t be denied, the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Jason Niblett, co-founder & publisher, Venture South Magazine.

But first the sound-bites:

On the genesis of Venture South: I’ve been working for newspapers for many years. And of course, with the newspapers we’ve always had the newspaper-style magazine that we were required to do. I’ve always done social and lifestyle magazines, and I’ve had this concept in the back of my mind for a long time; something for everyday, normal people, not all about the million dollar houses, the gardens, huge swimming pools, but a magazine that everyone could use. From girls’ night out, to family weekends; things like that.

On whether he believes people think he has lost his mind for starting a print magazine in a digital age: (Laughs) Probably so. But there was such a desire for something like Venture South in Laurel. There are so many dynamic things happening here right now. We have the HGTV series, “Home Town,” that’s filming its second season. And last year we had the Matthew McConaughey movie, “Free State of Jones,” which is about our county.

On how he is taking what he learned from his newspaper career and applying it to his new magazine business: Definitely market research and demographic information that I’ve learned over the years at the newspaper. We have beautiful lifestyle magazines already, and we did not want to be a lifestyle magazine. There’s a huge audience in Mississippi that’s just normal, everyday people; the nurses, teachers, office personnel; those are the normal people in Mississippi. Of course, there’s the upper class echelon, but that audience isn’t huge, especially in our area. And so, you definitely have to learn how to target your audience.

On whether he has any plans to “venture further south” than his own city limits: Absolutely. We had a name that I’d had in the back of my head for five or six years, and once the three of us starting meeting, we were all leaning toward that name and going in that direction. Then suddenly, we had an epiphany and decided that wasn’t what we needed to name the magazine. We knew that we needed to go in a different direction where we could expand into New Orleans, Mobile, or Pensacola, or wherever. There is potential to do just that, explore and expand more regionally.

On the first conversation he had right after the first issue came out: One of my former high school teachers emailed me and she was just telling me how wonderful the magazine was. She loved the content and the direction and ideas. And she lives in Mendenhall, Miss. She started sharing it around, and that’s why we see the potential for a more regional publication, because once she started pushing it toward the city she lives in, and her friends and family in surrounding areas, and even her hometown of Natchez, Miss., we began to receive requests for subscriptions and we had planned to be just a free distribution-type magazine.

On any advice he would offer students should he ever speak to a class: Keep an open mind. When I was at the University of Mississippi, I was majoring in broadcast journalism. I went to NewsWatch 12 and the SMC (Student Media Center). I didn’t pay too much attention to the Daily Mississippian or to the yearbook, because I wanted to be on TV. I did that for about six months after I left Ole Miss, and I hated it. I ended up in newspapers.

On the advice he would give his newspaper colleagues about their own magazines: A problem that we had at our operation was not to make it a glorified people section of the newspaper. You have your daily, weekly, or biweekly newspaper, or whatever frequency you have, for that people section. Your magazine needs to be something nicer, with exceptional features, photography, and design. Don’t skimp on your freelancers, and if you don’t have the skills to design it yourself, hire a good graphic artist, because there are so many magazines in Mississippi that look like nothing but glossy, people sections.

On what he would have tattooed upon his brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about him: That I always tried to be a big community proponent; family first, work second, but if you enjoy your job, you don’t really have to work. (Laughs)

On what someone would find him doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at his home: Definitely playing with the dogs. And I do love to cook; I joined one of those meal delivery services to try different things, and we’ve been doing that for about a year now. We get this cardboard box every week and sometimes the food is great and sometimes it’s not, but we’re always trying it. We love to travel to the Coast a lot, even if it’s just to walk on the beach or grab something good to eat. Here lately, we’ve been reading a lot of magazines and reading industry publications.

On what keeps him up at night: It’s definitely advertising, even though we broke even. It’s one of those things that you have to trust in God, because yesterday was a horrible advertising day and we’re going to press very soon. And then that afternoon late, bam, bam, bam; we booked several ads. So, I try to just have faith, because this is definitely a God-thing when I talk about divine intervention for the timing and everything. It’s all going to be okay. Even when I get stressed out, I know that it’s going to be okay. So, I try not to let that keep me up at night. (Laughs)

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Jason Niblett, co-founder & publisher, Venture South Magazine.

Samir Husni: Tell me about the genesis of Venture South magazine.

Jason Niblett: I’ve been working for newspapers for many years. And of course, with the newspapers we’ve always had the newspaper-style magazine that we were required to do. I’ve always done social and lifestyle magazines, and I’ve had this concept in the back of my mind for a long time; something for everyday, normal people, not all about the million dollar houses, the gardens, huge swimming pools, but a magazine that everyone could use. From girls’ night out, to family weekends; things like that.

That was in the spring. I was working for a newspaper corporation in Laurel, Miss. And in Laurel, there were two newspapers, which it was a struggle for both newspapers to make it. And I knew that our newspaper was probably in trouble, but I thought that they would get rid of me and put the newspaper operation under a neighboring operation in Hattiesburg. So, we were all surprised when the paper closed completely in June.

In the spring, we had moved our office across town to a place that was a little bit cheaper, and about a week later, I got an email that my salary had been cut drastically. So, I knew that it was time for me to figure out what I was going to do next. I had been laid off from three different newspapers throughout my career and I’m only 38 years old. That’s a lot of layoffs for someone my age.

So basically, me and two of my friends decided that it was time to pull the trigger and do our own thing. So we started meeting that spring, after I received that email about the salary cut, and I had planned on sometime this fall, maybe winter, quitting my job to do this magazine. Then I find out my last day to work would be July 14, because we were being laid off and the paper closed.

So, everything accelerated, but honestly it was perfect timing, and definitely some divine intervention, because right after we started selling advertising, we had our media kits ready, but we didn’t have our premier edition to show everybody, we started hearing that there were two other groups, one an individual and one a corporation, looking at Laurel for starting a magazine. And so we knew we had to get ours out. Thankfully, we were able to break even for the first one, which was wonderful. But we had to get it out to stave off any victims of the competition.

Samir Husni: After seeing what’s happening with newspapers, and after being laid off three different times, do you still believe in ink on paper? Why are you starting a print magazine in this digital age; do people think you have you lost your mind?

Jason Niblett: (Laughs) Probably so. But there was such a desire for something like Venture South in Laurel. There are so many dynamic things happening here right now. We have the HGTV series, “Home Town,” that’s filming its second season. And last year we had the Matthew McConaughey movie, “Free State of Jones,” which is about our county.

And once it was announced that the paper was closing, my own phone and the office phone rang constantly for the next few weeks with people telling me that I had to do something. And of course, while I was still at the office, I was very professional in closing down that operation the way that it needed to be. Once we announced the magazine, it has just been insanely popular. It’s crazy. (Laughs)

Samir Husni: We’re seeing a lot of new magazines appearing, and as you mentioned earlier, almost every newspaper in Mississippi has its own magazine, or two or three. I remember in one of my seminars at the Mississippi Press Association, I challenged the newspaper people to follow more of a magazine style on a daily or weekly basis, because the problem is not with the ink on paper, it’s with what you put on that ink on paper. How are you taking what you learned from your newspaper career and offering it now on a monthly platform to your audience?

Jason Niblett: Definitely market research and demographic information that I’ve learned over the years at the newspaper. We have beautiful lifestyle magazines already, and we did not want to be a lifestyle magazine. There’s a huge audience in Mississippi that’s just normal, everyday people; the nurses, teachers, office personnel; those are the normal people in Mississippi. Of course, there’s the upper class echelon, but that audience isn’t huge, especially in our area. And so, you definitely have to learn how to target your audience.

Samir Husni: You mentioned that you broke even with the first issue, which is rare in our business. If you wanted to use your crystal ball for a minute; what does the future hold for Venture South? And also, with a name like Venture South, do you plan on going beyond the city limits, maybe down toward the Gulf Coast?

Jason Niblett: Absolutely. We had a name that I’d had in the back of my head for five or six years, and once the three of us starting meeting, we were all leaning toward that name and going in that direction. Then suddenly, we had an epiphany and decided that wasn’t what we needed to name the magazine. We knew that we needed to go in a different direction where we could expand into New Orleans, Mobile, or Pensacola, or wherever. There is potential to do just that, explore and expand more regionally.

Samir Husni: When you mention the “three” of you, who are you referring to?

Jason Niblett: Lacey Slay, our editor and designer, and Kevin Dearmon, who handles advertising, are the other two owners. And Lacey and Kevin both hold down full-time jobs in addition to the magazine. I’m the only full-time person.

Samir Husni: What was the first phone call or conversation you had after the magazine was distributed?

Jason Niblett: One of my former high school teachers emailed me and she was just telling me how wonderful the magazine was. She loved the content and the direction and ideas. And she lives in Mendenhall, Miss. She started sharing it around, and that’s why we see the potential for a more regional publication, because once she started pushing it toward the city she lives in, and her friends and family in surrounding areas, and even her hometown of Natchez, Miss., we began to receive requests for subscriptions and we had planned to be just a free distribution-type magazine. And we ended up with 200 subscriptions before the magazine even launched.

Samir Husni: If you were to come and speak to journalism students here at the University of Mississippi, what advice would you give them?

Jason Niblett: Keep an open mind. When I was at the University of Mississippi, I was majoring in broadcast journalism. I went to NewsWatch 12 and the SMC (Student Media Center). I didn’t pay too much attention to the Daily Mississippian or to the yearbook, because I wanted to be on TV. I did that for about six months after I left Ole Miss, and I hated it. I ended up in newspapers.

So, keep an open mind and definitely learn the different concepts and multimedia, and always have integrity and do what’s right, and you will be blessed.

Samir Husni: What advice would you give your colleagues at other newspapers about their own magazines?

Jason Niblett: A problem that we had at our operation was not to make it a glorified people section of the newspaper. You have your daily, weekly, or biweekly newspaper, or whatever frequency you have, for that people section. Your magazine needs to be something nicer, with exceptional features, photography, and design. Don’t skimp on your freelancers, and if you don’t have the skills to design it yourself, hire a good graphic artist, because there are so many magazines in Mississippi that look like nothing but glossy, people sections.

And we want to be debt-free, because we know in the publishing industry that debt can weigh you down, or put you out of business. We’re actually working out of my house, we turned a third bedroom into an office. We close the door when we’re done for the day and we stay out of that room, but you also have to be disciplined enough to get up in the morning, get a shower and get dressed, and act like you’re going to work. If you don’t, the day gets away from you.

Samir Husni: Who’s going to be on the cover of issue two?

Jason Niblett: Actually, we’re doing a story on “Phantom of the Opera” at the University of Southern Mississippi. So, that’s probably going to be our cover story.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Jason Niblett: That I always tried to be a big community proponent; family first, work second, but if you enjoy your job, you don’t really have to work. (Laughs)

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, after you had closed that office door, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of wine; reading a magazine; cooking; playing with your dogs; watching TV; or something else?

Jason Niblett: Definitely playing with the dogs. And I do love to cook; I joined one of those meal delivery services to try different things, and we’ve been doing that for about a year now. We get this cardboard box every week and sometimes the food is great and sometimes it’s not, but we’re always trying it. We love to travel to the Coast a lot, even if it’s just to walk on the beach or grab something good to eat. Here lately, we’ve been reading a lot of magazines and reading industry publications.

Samir Husni: My typical last question; what keeps you up at night?

Jason Niblett: It’s definitely advertising, even though we broke even. It’s one of those things that you have to trust in God, because yesterday was a horrible advertising day and we’re going to press very soon. And then that afternoon late, bam, bam, bam; we booked several ads. So, I try to just have faith, because this is definitely a God-thing when I talk about divine intervention for the timing and everything. It’s all going to be okay. Even when I get stressed out, I know that it’s going to be okay. So, I try not to let that keep me up at night. (Laughs)

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

The Two “Faces” of Family Circle Magazine – Different Covers, One Great Experience…

September 19, 2017

A Mr. Magazine™ Musing…

There’s nothing new about magazines having split covers, or the same magazine having several different covers, this has been happening for as far back as I can recall. However, what we’re seeing lately is how magazine editors and publishers are using the best attributes of technology and their own excellent publishing skills to laser-target their magazines to the intended audience.

Take for example the October issue of Family Circle. The magazine provides two different covers; one sold specifically at and for Wal-Mart, priced at $1.99, and the other sold to the rest of the country at bookstores such as Barnes & Noble and Books-A-Million at the $3.79 cover price. The two covers are amazingly different and each has its own personality.

When I asked Family Circle’s editor in chief, Cheryl E. Brown, about the two covers, and noted that besides the well-known fact that at Wal-Mart you always get the magazine a bit cheaper than at the bookstores, I also commented that what really grabbed my attention this month with the magazine was how upscale the bookstore version looked compared to the much more mass market appeal the Wal-Mart issue had. This was Cheryl’s answer:

“On the price difference, Family Circle and a number of other titles (including Woman’s Day and Good Housekeeping, in our competitive set) have Walmart-only pricing, mostly due to Walmart’s commitment to “Every Day Low Pricing.”

“On the different cover images, we had shot multiple Halloween covers that we liked, so decided to test a different version in Walmart. Walmart has calendar themes they like to promote, like Halloween and Game Time, so we thought the more playful/brighter image might fit in better with that in-store theme. And we tried a few cover lines that were more aligned with Walmart’s emphasis on everyday value and ease. It will be a couple months before we have results back; it will be interesting to see if the cover experimentation moves the needle on sales in that venue!”

The $3.79 issue shines with a more upscale and elegant look, showcasing golden-etched and silvery pumpkins that invite us to pour a cup of pumpkin spiced cider and sit by the roaring fire as we prepare for the Halloween and jack-o’-lantern season. While the Wal-Mart $1.99 edition begs us to discover easier ways to pick our pumpkin on a budget. And while the Wal-Mart magazine is just as engaging as the more polished one, the differences are subtly depicted, yet comfortably blatant. When one is shopping at Wal-Mart, they’re looking for great sales and short lines. When one is sipping cider by the firelight, the read should be more intimate and refined; a totally different experience. And that’s what magazines provide: different experiences, as any good editor in chief and publisher knows.

Either way, the October issue of Family Circle is a good example of a magazine well done. Depending on your budget, go pick up a copy from a store or a bookstore near you; both choices will give you a good read and a good experience that only magazines can provide.

So kudos to Cheryl Brown and her team for having a focused eye on their customers, both the reader and the retailer. It’s a comforting thought to know that magazine leaders maintain a healthy scrutiny that can only make the magazine experience more customized and fun!

Until the next Mr. Magazine™ Musing…
See you at the newsstands!

h1

Take Magazine 2.0: Publisher And Founder, Michael Kusek & Its Editor In Chief, Stacey Kors, Reveal To Mr. Magazine™ Why The Second Time Around Is The Real Charm…

September 18, 2017

“We can demonstrate that people who read Take in print really consume the print product and hang onto it. We just did a subscriber survey over the summer and we asked people how long they hung onto their copy of Take, and well over 55 percent of the people in that survey said they never throw their copies away. We’re reaching people who really, not only love our content, but love the magazine as an object that they want to hang onto. And I think that also from a business perspective, translating that and bringing that before advertisers is a really attractive prospect.” Michael Kusek…

“For me, yes, we’re in a digital world. We have access to new information every second and it’s also customized to our tastes. And we get this information, but there’s no real absorption of it because we’re immediately on to the next thing. For me, looking at a magazine is such a different experience, because it’s an active experience. There’s an intentionality to sitting down and reading it. There is an engagement of more than just sight; we hold it; we feel it as we turn the pages; we smell the paper. You’re obviously reading it.” Stacey Kors…

Relaunching a magazine takes real vision and commitment and a significant, underlying reason to do so. Take Magazine has all of that. It has dedication and a strong perception of its future in its publisher and founder, Michael Kusek, and a powerful affection and belief in its existence from its relatively new editor in chief, Stacey Kors. And a valid reason for being: its ever-growing audience.

Stacey Kors came onboard Take about nine months ago and hasn’t looked back since. She is a dynamic force for the magazine and brand with her sheer will and determination that the print component should and would be born back into the marketplace. As a new partner in Take Industries, Stacey, whose publishing career began in Western Massachusetts when she worked as a college intern for the region’s first high-end culture magazine, New England Monthly, has joined efforts with Michael, the magazine’s founder and publisher, to bring the print product back to its loyal readership better and stronger.

I spoke with Michael and Stacey recently and we talked about this Take-2 go-round for the printed magazine. The decision to go digital-only about a year ago was not one that Michael made lightly. His love for the Take brand was strong, but the reality of finances had to be considered. And as with any small, independent title, money is always a behemoth. But with Stacey climbing aboard and offering not only financial support and strength, but a passion for Take as strong as Michael’s, it would appear that the second time around will be the charm for this new duo, who also give much credit to the team behind them that makes everything more stalwartly creative.

So, I hope that you enjoy this interview with two people who share much more than the bottom line, but also a zeal and excitement for all things “Take”-able, the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Michael Kusek, founder & publisher, and Stacey Kors, editor in chief, Take Magazine.

But first the sound-bites:

On the resurrection of Take Magazine (Michael Kusek): We ran out of money. By the end of last July, we had had a fair amount of success at selling advertising for that fall, but came up short in terms of the capital we needed to get ourselves there. We needed a bridge to get from June to the fall when we’d sold some revenue. And I had to make the really tough decision about stopping the print edition and staying digital-only. The switch to just digital-only was really made possible because somebody lent us the money to refurbish our website. In late August, Stacey emailed me out of the blue, expressing interest in helping Take come back into print, and I was pretty surprised about getting that kind of email. (Laughs) We met and had coffee, and the conversation started there, and it lasted a few months, while we envisioned what we would need to be a bit more stable.

On the resurrection of Take Magazine (Stacey Kors): I’m an old print junkie. I cut my teeth in this business; I was actually an intern at New England Monthly, our first successful regional magazine. I have been involved with covering arts and culture for a couple of decades now, and have been previously writing for the Boston Globe. In the spring of last year, they started very heavily cutting their arts coverage and their arts staff, like so many other places, unfortunately. I had an opportunity to be able to participate, and see if I could help Michael return the magazine to print. And as he said, we started talking and we were able to make that happen. It’s been a long road, but a wonderful one.

On why they brought Take Magazine back into print in this digital age (Stacey Kors): I can answer from the editorial side. For me, yes, we’re in a digital world. We have access to new information every second and it’s also customized to our tastes. And we get this information, but there’s no real absorption of it because we’re immediately on to the next thing. For me, looking at a magazine is such a different experience, because it’s an active experience. There’s an intentionality to sitting down and reading it. There is an engagement of more than just sight; we hold it; we feel it as we turn the pages; we smell the paper. You’re obviously reading it.

On why they brought Take Magazine back into print in this digital age (Michael Kusek): When we stopped the print issue, we got a lot of emails from readers who were upset to see it go, and then we announced that we were coming back and we received a lot of response from readers who were very excited to be able to add to their stack of Take Magazine’s on their coffee tables. I think that the loyalty that we’re building with our readers is something that, by being local people producing a local magazine, is something that we can demonstrate to advertisers. And because we do have at least a glowing, robust presence online and a real building loyal readership in print, I think that bodes really well for relationships with advertisers down the road.

On any challenges that they had to overcome when they relaunched in print (Michael Kusek): I think one of our challenges, at least on the business side, has been the idea that we went away once, so are we going to be here this go-round. So, it’s that convincing people, particularly advertisers, that if we’re going to build a relationship with them we are going to be here. We’re working our hardest to stay here. We’re definitely having a better response from advertisers than we did the first time around. And I think that’s one of the challenges, certainly from a business perspective.

On whether that first issue made all of the nine months’ of work and worry worth it (Stacey Kors): The two experiences that I’ve had that made it all seem worth it was going to the printer with the team, our amazing printer, Cummings in New Hampshire, watching the process and seeing that all of those ideas we’d had for so long were made real for everyone; it was just amazing. And the other experience happened recently, where our writers and our subjects started to receive the magazine. And everybody was so excited; everybody talked about how gorgeous it was. They were all so pleased and that we did something right and that was definitely worth it.

On what’s next for Take Magazine (Stacey Kors): From an editorial point of view, we have the train on the track and moving, and we’re working on three issues at a time. And we’re trying to create beautiful, timeless copy, with wonderful profiles of artists and culture-makers here.

On what’s next for Take Magazine (Michael Kusek): One of our challenges is figuring out the best way to do distribution. I have to credit ACT 7 this past spring, in particular, for getting good contacts with specifically independent magazines. Lukas Volger and Steve Viksjo from Jarry magazine have become good friends in the months that followed, because both as small, independent titles, we’re trying to figure out newsstand. And we’re trying to figure out the best way to convert digital followers into print subscribers.

On what he would have tattooed upon his brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about him (Michael Kusek): I think work hard and have fun doing it.

On what she would have tattooed upon her brain that would be there forever and no one could ever forget about her (Stacey Kors): Live in the present and be mindful.

On what someone would find her doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at her home (Stacey Kors): For me, unwinding is sitting with a glass of wine or a drink and reading the magazine or looking at some magazines and books, taking my eyes off of screens for a while. If the weather is conducive and it’s the right season, I might be in my garden, picking things to cook for dinner, making a beautiful meal ad savoring it fully.

On what someone would find him doing if they showed up unexpectedly one evening at his home (Michael Kusek): For me, probably scrolling social media and watching the Rachel Maddow Show. (Laughs)

What keeps her up at night (Stacey Kors): The state of the world concerns me greatly on a macro level. Otherwise, honestly? Just thinking about the magazine a lot, there are a lot of balls in the air all at once and I’m always thinking about how to not drop one. How to make things better and stronger and successful.

What keep him up at night (Michael Kusek): The amount of unanswered emails that I have. (Laughs) And trying to remember to get back to people on the 10 different platforms that they message me on. That keeps me up at night.

And now the lightly edited transcript of the Mr. Magazine™ interview with Michael Kusek, publisher, and Stacey Kors, editor in chief, Take Magazine.

Samir Husni: It’s always a sad day when a print magazine goes out of business, but it’s also a joyful day when that magazine comes back. Tell me a little about the story of Take 2.0. (Laughs)

Michael Kusek: (Laughs too) We ran out of money. By the end of last July, we had had a fair amount of success at selling advertising for that fall, but came up short in terms of the capital we needed to get ourselves there. We needed a bridge to get from June to the fall when we’d sold some revenue. And I had to make the really tough decision about stopping the print edition and staying digital-only. And that was about the end of June.

The switch to just digital-only was really made possible because somebody lent us the money to refurbish our website. We spent the better part of July working on the website, and then getting that launched in early August. In late August, Stacey emailed me out of the blue, expressing interest in helping Take come back into print, and I was pretty surprised about getting that kind of email. (Laughs)

We met and had coffee, and the conversation started there, and it lasted a few months, while we envisioned what we would need to be a bit more stable. And what resources we needed that we lacked in our first go-round. And we worked on that through December.

Stacey Kors: I’m an old print junkie. I cut my teeth in this business; I was actually an intern at New England Monthly, our first successful regional magazine. I have been involved with covering arts and culture for a couple of decades now, and have been previously writing for the Boston Globe. In the spring of last year, they started very heavily cutting their arts coverage and their arts staff, like so many other places, unfortunately.

It was a combination of my lamenting that and trying to figure out personally what I was going to do next. And also lamenting the state of the print industry as a whole, just seeing it shrink more and more. I had known about Take from the beginning and had seen many copies of it and really liked it. I happened to come across the last issue, was reminded of it again, and thought that it would be a wonderful place to write and engage, and I was so glad that it existed. And then I looked at the website and I read Michael’s post, that unfortunately they weren’t going to continue. And I was heartbroken. It was such a wonderful and important resource. It was so beautifully put together; the stories were so interesting and timeless.

I had an opportunity to be able to participate, and see if I could help Michael return the magazine to print. And as he said, we started talking and we were able to make that happen. It’s been a long road, but a wonderful one.

Samir Husni: My question for the both of you is why print in this digital age? Besides being romantics about print, including myself, if we talk from the business side, why print? What’s the fascination you and Michael have with print that brought Take Magazine back to life?

Stacey Kors: I can answer from the editorial side. For me, yes, we’re in a digital world. We have access to new information every second and it’s also customized to our tastes. And we get this information, but there’s no real absorption of it because we’re immediately on to the next thing. For me, looking at a magazine is such a different experience, because it’s an active experience. There’s an intentionality to sitting down and reading it. There is an engagement of more than just sight; we hold it; we feel it as we turn the pages; we smell the paper. You’re obviously reading it.

And it’s not about disseminating information the way that we get it now; it’s really about the art of storytelling that involves thoughtfully written articles and gorgeous images. And specifically, for us, I love that across the board and I think it’s important that there’s a place for us to all stop and take the time to read a long-form article and engage in that way.

But for what we do, we cover artists and culture-makers in the region, and they’re all people who take their time to make something special, meaningful and beautiful, be it visual art or a well-crafted cocktail. And I think they deserve to have their stories told with that same intentionality.

Michael Kusek: It’s interesting, our period of time where we were digital-only put us in this position where we really had to think about what we were doing digitally for those six months. Beginning last September, we really put more focus on it and have seen some great results in the last year. We’ve gone from just over 3,000 readers per month on our website to being in the mid-thirties now every month in the last year. And that’s like 20 percent growth per month, which as one of my friends would say, is Facebook numbers. (Laughs) And I’m very happy with that, because we’re reaching an audience.

And it’s very interesting on the digital front to see who reads us. In August, our number two city that reads Take online was New York. And it’s not even in New England. (Laughs) So, the digital side of it certainly allows us to reach readers that aren’t part of our geographic focus for the physical distribution of the magazine.

I still think that print, particularly because we’re tightly, regionally focused, it’s easier for us, certainly not easy, but it’s easier for us to make a real connection with our readers, and it’s through our editorial, but also through who’s working for us. We have freelancers who are located all over the region, who help us create our content. So, as a print piece, people are picking it up and we’re not landing in New England from some far off place. We are a publication that is made by New Englanders for New Englanders. And I think that has been the basis of the success that we’ve had so far in reaching readers.

When we stopped the print issue, we got a lot of emails from readers who were upset to see it go, and then we announced that we were coming back and we received a lot of response from readers who were very excited to be able to add to their stack of Take Magazine’s on their coffee tables. I think that the loyalty that we’re building with our readers is something that, by being local people producing a local magazine, is something that we can demonstrate to advertisers. And because we do have at least a glowing, robust presence online and a real building loyal readership in print, I think that bodes really well for relationships with advertisers down the road.

We can demonstrate that people who read Take in print really consume the print product and hang onto it. We just did a subscriber survey over the summer and we asked people how long they hung onto their copy of Take, and well over 55 percent of the people in that survey said they never throw their copies away. We’re reaching people who really, not only love our content, but love the magazine as an object that they want to hang onto. And I think that also from a business perspective, translating that and bringing that before advertisers is a really attractive prospect.

Samir Husni: Since December, when the partnership took place between you and Stacey and the decision was made to relaunch the print magazine, has it been an easy walk in a rose garden, or were there any stumbling blocks that you both had to overcome? And if there were, how did you overcome them?

Michael Kusek: I think one of our challenges, at least on the business side, has been the idea that we went away once, so are we going to be here this go-round. So, it’s that convincing people, particularly advertisers, that if we’re going to build a relationship with them we are going to be here. We’re working our hardest to stay here. We’re definitely having a better response from advertisers than we did the first time around. And I think that’s one of the challenges, certainly from a business perspective.

Another thing, in terms of how we were moving forward from Take-version 1 to Take-version 2, was repairing our relationship with freelancers, who had waited a long time to get paid. And part of this deal was making sure that we made everyone whole that we owed money to. And we were very fortunate that we were in a position that when we restarted the magazine that we were able to start with a clean slate. And the challenge there is that for people who are content creators, they’re happy to work for us, but they also need to know that they’re going to get paid.

And reassuring them of that is a challenge, and certainly in that process, everybody wants to get paid for the work that they do, and some people were very vocally upset about that, some people offered to forego payment, and some folks were just very patient and didn’t say anything one way or another. But that was a really important thing that we needed to do.

Samir Husni: And Stacey, now that the first issue is done and the magazine is back, what was your reaction? Was it worth all of that worry and work for almost nine months, the time is equivalent to an actual birth. (Laughs)

Stacey Kors: (Laughs too) And that’s what it felt like.

Samir Husni: Were the labor pains worth it when the magazine came out? (Laughs)

Stacey Kors: Oh yes, but to continue in that vein, it was a laborious process. We did have some staff who had moved on to other positions. We hired a new art director and a managing editor. So, part of the process was getting our small team together and running smoothly, but of course, the first issue is going to be the most difficult time. To the regrouping and figuring out how we wanted to change things; how we wanted to keep things the same for the magazine, there was a lot of back and forth, we’re a team who shares visions, and there was and is a lot of serious discussion, and certainly a lot of very hard work, assigning and editing and going back and forth on art, and coming up with something that really felt like Take. And even better.

The two experiences that I’ve had that made it all seem worth it was going to the printer with the team, our amazing printer, Cummings in New Hampshire, watching the process and seeing that all of those ideas we’d had for so long were made real for everyone; it was just amazing. And the other experience happened recently, where our writers and our subjects started to receive the magazine. And everybody was so excited; everybody talked about how gorgeous it was. They were all so pleased and that we did something right and that was definitely worth it.

Samir Husni: Now, you’re on top of the mountain, what’s next?

Stacey Kors: (Laughs) The December/January issue.

Samir Husni: (Laughs too).

Stacey Kors: From an editorial point of view, we have the train on the track and moving, and we’re working on three issues at a time. And we’re trying to create beautiful, timeless copy, with wonderful profiles of artists and culture-makers here. From the business point of view, Michael…

Michael Kusek: One of our challenges is figuring out the best way to do distribution. I have to credit ACT 7 this past spring, in particular, for getting good contacts with specifically independent magazines. Lukas Volger and Steve Viksjo from Jarry magazine have become good friends in the months that followed, because both as small, independent titles, we’re trying to figure out newsstand. And we’re trying to figure out the best way to convert digital followers into print subscribers.

And there are no simple answers for that path forward, because even as a small title we get some of the difficulties that larger legacy titles have at the newsstand. But we don’t have the budget to sort of pay to be there. So, we have to get innovative and creative about our distribution efforts. We’re relying on partnering with cultural organizations around the region, where we can distribute copies of Take so that people get it in their hands and get a sense and a feel for it. So, that’s one of our big challenges. And we have really great help from the folks from Tyson Associates in Connecticut, getting around that. So, that’s a piece of the puzzle that we’re working on, figuring out what’s best for a small magazine.

Samir Husni: If you could have one thing tattooed upon your brain that no one would ever forget about you, what would it be?

Michael Kusek: I think work hard and have fun doing it.

Stacey Kors: Live in the present and be mindful.

Samir Husni: If I showed up unexpectedly at your home one evening after work, what would I find you doing? Having a glass of wine; reading a magazine; cooking; on your iPad; watching TV; or something else?

Stacey Kors: Yes. (Laughs) All of those, though not at the same time. For me, unwinding is sitting with a glass of wine or a drink and reading the magazine or looking at some magazines and books, taking my eyes off of screens for a while. If the weather is conducive and it’s the right season, I might be in my garden, picking things to cook for dinner, making a beautiful meal ad savoring it fully.

Michael Kusek: For me, probably scrolling social media and watching the Rachel Maddow Show. (Laughs)

Samir Husni: My typical last question; what keeps you both up at night?

Stacey Kors: The state of the world concerns me greatly on a macro level. Otherwise, honestly? Just thinking about the magazine a lot, there are a lot of balls in the air all at once and I’m always thinking about how to not drop one. How to make things better and stronger and successful.

Michael Kusek: The amount of unanswered emails that I have. (Laughs) And trying to remember to get back to people on the 10 different platforms that they message me on. That keeps me up at night.

Samir Husni: Thank you both.