Archive for the ‘News and Views’ Category

h1

Newsweek is Alive in Print…in Europe? (updated)

February 14, 2013

Did the folks in Europe hear the news that Newsweek is now a digital only entity? After all the fanfare about morphing into a digital entity, my friend Branislav Ondrasik from the Pan European University in Bratislava, Solvakia emailed me a picture from a newsstand in the capital city with the comment questioning whether the folks at Newsweek “still believe there is market for it at least here.” He adds “Newsweek is on a newsstand in Bratislava, Slovakia and across the continent.” The proof is in the picture below. The cover is dated Feb. 13, 2013. Go figure!

Picture 2

Apparently Newsweek is printed in The Netherlands under license by a different company called Newsweek EMEA (Europe, Mideast, Africa). The content of the magazine is the same as the digital edition. And, here is yet another print evidence, this time from Paris (Thanks Patrick)…
Picture 3

h1

The Printed Magazine is Your Calling Card To A Much Bigger Business and Other Cool (and Profitable) Advice from Jonathan Rheingold, Founder and Creator of Respect and Tally HO! Magazines. The Mr. Magazine™ Interview.

February 11, 2013

Screen shot 2013-02-07 at 3.33.37 PM Hip-Hop’s hippest and most successful co-creator of urban magazines XXL, King, and many more, Jonathan Rheingold, talks about his own creations, Respect…another hip-hop feather in his urban cap, and his latest print endeavor, Tally Ho!, a total celebration of some of photography’s most inspiring artists. So prime your rhyme and sit back, Jack, with Mr. Magazine™, as he turns you on to some of the coolest advice ever given, with hip-hop’s own Jonathan Rheingold.

Jonathan Rheingold isn’t just sitting around on his laurels waiting for the golden rapper to pronounce him King of all urban legends of print. While his 22 years spent at Harris Publications was a great experience and something he will always treasure, Rheingold has moved on…with warp speed. Three years ago he launched Respect, a hip-hop offering of sophisticated photographic flair and fare. The magazine teams Rheingold, once again, with the famed urban blogger, Elliott Wilson, and together the two are proving their professional compatibility is unbeatable. And now, on the heels of the successful Respect, Rheingold has united with Phil Knott to bring the world fine art in the form of some of the most awe-inspiring photography around with Tally Ho!. Combining the artistic poignancy of Tally Ho! with the cultural kick of Respect, not to mention throwing in an entire custom-designed program for advertisers that gives them multiple platforms to target, Rheingold has hit pay dirt once again.

And as with every Mr. Magazine™ Interviews, first the sound-bites followed by the lightly edited transcript of the interview.

The Sound-bites:

On why he still believes in print: I still think it’s an extraordinarily viable platform to reach consumers. The fact is that the engagement with print, in my opinion, and I’m sure a lot of statistics would support this, is still one of the strongest areas to target consumers with premium content that they pay for.

On why creating his own custom-designed ad campaigns for his clients are the future of advertising: What drives our business is the programs that integrate all the platforms across the board that we actually customize. So when you look in Respect magazine and you see those G-Shock campaigns for Casio, our in-house agency creates all of that for them.

On why his magazine is a calling card: I get to reach my audience through all these different mediums beyond the magazine, yet I’m still doing the magazine. So the magazine is not only a calling card for advertising, and in itself it’s still a valid medium, it is a calling card to the much bigger programs that we do.

On why the term advertiser just doesn’t fit anymore: So a lot of these companies that historically, as a magazine publisher, I would have called advertisers, I now call clients. They’re clients because we help them reach an audience through many touch points. So, the traditional conversation was…let’s discuss a rate and a frequency, and then we negotiate. Now the conversations are, whether we want them to be or not, as though we’re an agency.

300x250promo And now here is the complete Mr. Magazine™ Interview, lightly edited, with Tally Ho! and Respect’s Jonathan Rheingold.

Samir Husni: I know you just celebrated your third anniversary with Respect magazine and now you’ve launched Tally Ho!, do you think there’s a future for print? Why are you introducing a new print magazine in this digital age?

Jonathan Rheingold: Well, there are a lot of good reasons. I still think it’s an extraordinarily viable platform to reach consumers. I’d have to almost take you back a little to understand. I was at Harris Publications for 22 years and I was a very loyal employee and I co-created with them, along with Dennis Page, who was my partner-in-crime and my boss for many years. We had an incredible run and co-created a lot of great magazines at the time with one of the top mediums. You know the web has definitely changed the landscape quite a bit. But the fact is that the engagement with print, in my opinion, and I’m sure a lot of statistics would support this, is still one of the strongest areas to target consumers with premium content that they pay for. To me the vitality of readers of magazines is the strongest out of any other medium because it’s a whole tactile experience. In terms of Respect, every magazine has a different story. Respect, when I launched it three years ago, happened at a time when the magazine apps were really just starting to come out. People were asking me why are you doing a print magazine and I said…well, in my years of launching all these pop culture oriented publications, I kept in contact with all these great photographers and I love their work. I have a passion for it. And honestly, outside of a gallery or a museum, I can’t think of a better place to experience fine art. But photography is a medium that I think is best-served in print, unless you’re seeing it in person.

res_13_jcole_cvr The experience is everything

My original thought process, putting the commercial viability aside for a moment, was to create a magazine that would best serve the beauty of the pictures. And to me digital falls really behind in that area. I don’t think that you could really experience the type of content we have in Respect, on a tactile level, like you could do in a print magazine. It just made perfect sense in terms of photography, stills work very well in print, and Respect, for a hip-hop magazine, as a matter of fact for any music magazine, was a whole new approach really. It was created to celebrate the best photography, and journalism. It’s all about delivering five-star, curated content. And not to knock the competition, such as XXL magazine, which is dear to me because I co-created it, but we believe when you launch a magazine you have to differentiate yourself, and again, in this digital culture we live in, I feel like if I’m going to launch a magazine and have a passion for something, it should be real.

In photography and the area of urban culture, there has never been a magazine that truly celebrated it on a really sophisticated level. Everyone had claimed to do that, but I think that not since the early incarnation of Vibe, has there been a magazine like Respect. I truly believe it’s the best hip-hop magazine there is. There’s no back-up book from an advertising standpoint, no defamatory content toward women, and we really celebrate the photography and the subjects in the magazine. To get to your main question: why do a print magazine? I think that the experience we provide is best-served in the format of a print publication. And if it’s about how do we reach people, I’m still very newsstand driven, so we do distribute Respect widely, globally, on newsstands. So our readership is a paid readership, it’s not controlled circ. We don’t give them away. You have to buy it on the newsstand. There is a qualitative aspect to that.

The key to advertising today is custom-content

The advertising space has become extraordinarily difficult in magazines, let alone in the urban market. We had a hip-hop boom and then a bubble. And that bubble broke. Companies that were legendary to the culture such as Phat Farm, Fubu, Enyce; all these companies which were born out of the culture by entrepreneurs who came from the inner cities and were able to capitalize on the culture and make a really beautiful living for themselves, a lot of those companies either don’t exist, or have become mass brands. So there is very little endemic business. And as the music business advertising has moved mostly online in an effort to close transactions just to sell songs, there’s very little advertising to garner in the urban space if you’re looking for low-hanging fruit. In other words, advertisers who are spending a tremendous amount of their marketing dollars on targeting urban readers aren’t so common in print anymore. We had this great idea with Respect in wanting it to always be culturally relevant.

I left Harris in 2009 because my advertisers wanted to have access to more media from us and bigger programs. We were very limited in terms of just merely offering print. There were companies out there like Complex Media and Cornerstone and Vice, which is also an agency with Virtue, they were all what I call the hybrid agencies that came into the business. A lot of them were born out of magazines. Complex was a magazine, Cornerstone has Fader, Virtue has Vice, Filter Media has Filter.

I see the magazine, Respect, as being a calling card to a much bigger business. I run the magazine profitably, very lean, with the best talent. It’s a self-sufficient business as I run it, but it’s definitely a calling card to a much bigger platform. We, Musinart, the parent company, have an advertising ad network. We represent approximately a dozen different sites in pop culture, ranging from music to sports to fashion. And then we also have an in-house agency where we produce a lot of custom content. Now when I get an RFP for the magazine or an RFP for the network, I’m able to bundle all of these different media together into a unified program. I do sell standard ads on the web. I sell standard ad pages in the magazine. But really, what drives our business is the programs that integrate all the platforms across the board that we actually customize. So when you look in Respect magazine and you see those G-Shock campaigns for Casio, our in-house agency creates all of that for them. We curate the talent for the programs. I identify the talent. We release them legally; everything is very, very legitimate. We shoot the content in the programs for the print advertorial. We shoot video of the subjects that we use for digital, which we then have the ability, like a creative agency, to create content, but what we do differently from a creative agency, is we then have the ability to disseminate it as well. When I shoot a video or a series for one of our clients like Casio, Hennessy, Crown Royal or K-Swiss, we’re able to take those videos and feed them across our ad network which brings the scale that a magazine does not have. And even magazines that typically have their own respective websites, they’re usually small.

Custom-content, across a variety of platforms

There’s that phenomena that I’m sure you’re familiar with, Samir. The very popular magazines that are in a particular special interest and have websites usually can’t compete with the small, independent groups of individuals that are also living that lifestyle in the digital world. Usually the random blog in hip-hop could be as large as a substantial-sized magazine that has a website. What I knew from my own experience at Harris was not to put all of my energy into digital in building my own digital platform. Instead, put the energy into the creative aspect in delivering advertisers efficiencies and programs that are very custom for them and using the audience from the magazine and the network to push out those campaigns. When you come back to G-Shock again, you have the advertorial in the magazine; you have the videos that we create that live on their platform, so Casio actually houses that content on the G-Shock site. And we use our network to push those videos and to drive traffic to our advertiser’s platforms. It takes into account the print experience, but it also has multiple touch points that really, to me, make it like the ultimate fantasy for a print publisher. I get to reach my audience through all these different mediums beyond the magazine, yet I’m still doing the magazine.

The magazine is not only a calling card for advertising, and in itself it’s still a valid medium, it is a calling card to the much bigger programs that we do. But in addition to that, the magazine still gives us the ability to garner the attention and the talent that we need to build these programs, because the talent wants to be featured in the magazine. There’s nothing like being immortalized in print to an emerging artist, or to an established talent. If you ask any major artist if they’d rather be on the cover of a magazine or on the homepage of a website, they’re going to pick the magazine, because the website, first of all, is vapor. It’s there and then it’s gone. And the magazine is like an accolade. If you’re a rapper and you’re on the cover of Respect, it’s just short of winning a Grammy. It’s a great accolade to be on the cover of XXL, Rolling Stone, Respect or Vibe.

Print has a validation that digital just doesn’t have

I think it’s that print still has that cache, that credibility factor of the journalism inside. The amount of care and time that goes into producing that product is just on a different level than creating digital content. I’m not saying that it’s better. I’m just saying that the engagement is much different, and definitely for the talent, it has far more relevance and importance to them. And it helps us with the advertisers, because the print product definitely garners talent for a campaign. The level of talent that we’re able to procure, from writers and photographers, is much greater in a magazine than it is on the web. And we’re able to leverage that, to create these really great programs.

Embracing digital, while promoting print

Musinart, just to give you background, is an integrated media company. We have an ad network where we create campaigns, recruit talent, create content, whether it’s print or digital content, and then we have the ability to disseminate it through different mediums, both magazine and digital. It’s really a one-stop, efficiency company that I designed to speak to the ever-changing print-advertising climate. My company was definitely birthed out of, what I believe, is what’s necessary to be a great print publisher in this climate. You have to embrace digital, which doesn’t mean you have to abandon print. It means you have to embrace all of it. That’s really what Musinart is about and my legacy in urban culture and co-creating and launching King and Scratch and XXL…I know you remember all the magazines we launched…Hardball and Blitz. Dennis and I were prolific for many, many years. And then the Internet changed things. Respect and my experience in urban music was really a solution, if you will, to that space of not only offering print, but a full-service program. When I talk about Casio G-Shock, we’re the only hip-hop publication that Casio advertises in. Everything we do for Casio is custom, in every issue. It’s custom. Anything with K-Swiss, Crown Royal, we did a very big program.

Once called advertisers; now called clients

A lot of these companies that historically, as a magazine publisher, I would have called advertisers, I now call clients. They’re clients because we help them reach an audience through many touch points. The traditional conversation was…let’s discuss a rate and a frequency, and then we negotiate. Now the conversations are, whether we want them to be or not, as though we’re an agency. We have agencies that contact us with RFPs that request very creative executions that are original and not cookie-cutter at all. And that requires very creative selling and access to really great talent to create those programs for them, so that’s very much what my company is about. Sometimes you’ll be looking at an issue of Respect and see that amazing ad for K-Swiss and not even realize that to get that ad and to sell that ad, I had to make it. And that’s also, I believe, what makes me scrappier than your average agency, because my form of selling, and the fact that I have to create these campaigns, are really a result of my means of selling advertising. And if I have to sell an ad and I have to create the campaign, then that’s what I’m going to do. A lot of companies are doing that now. Where we’ve set ourselves apart is that the quality of our work is exceptional. We operate like a real ad agency.

Within three years’ time, I built a very successful publication. Elliott Wilson, the most celebrated hip-hop journalist, who was named by MTV as the face of hip-hop journalism last year, is the editor of Respect, and during our heyday at XXL, he and I were the best-selling team, I was the executive publisher and he was the editor. And those were the best days of XXL, without question. So he’s onboard. And he also has a very successful rap blog and that is a separate business. Musinart actually represents Rap Radar. It’s a bit incestuous. I represent a blogger who’s the editor of my magazine. So again, when we do these programs, it makes them that much more successful because I really get the bloggers engaged in what we do. But at the end of the day, I don’t think the Musinart Company would be as successful or as unique if we didn’t produce the publications too.

Samir Husni: We are living in this Transcended Infinite Media age where it’s more of a tangled web, and it seems like you are in every string of that web. Is this the future?

Jonathan Rheingold: I believe it is. You know, magazines, hopefully not in our lifetimes, may become extinct, but the future now is really about integration. I don’t believe that magazines are going anywhere, and I don’t think they’re exactly analogous to vinyl and to music, because without question, it’s a particular type of physical experience that just can’t be replicated digitally. I think it’s more analogous with the movies. You know everyone thought that with the advent of streaming video and film, that ticket sales at movie theaters would be dead. And movies are still breaking records. That’s because people still want to go to the movies. You can’t replicate that at home.

Samir Husni: Do you find that it’s easy to replicate with Tally Ho! what you did with Respect?

Screen Shot 2013-02-10 at 8.32.15 PMJonathan Rheingold: Tally Ho! was an utter and total rite of passage from Respect. Phil Knott was a photographer that I interfaced with on Respect, his work stood out to me. If you read my letter, there’s a short story of how we came together. We got together and he had this really crude newspaper that he had done in 2006 that was kind of slapped together. And I thought it had great promise. I just loved the concept of a print publication being a gallery of sorts, and to work, being a type of visual creation; it really would be best-served in print. And so Phil had shown me this newspaper, it was a little cruddy, but the concept was cool, and I said if I put a team together and package the real publication with you, I think we could do something really different.

Swimming against the current
As a matter of fact, where everything seems to be continually going digital, my company is the audacious organization. Where people are getting away from print, I’m here to launch, but I’m only going to launch ideas that I feel would conceptually work better in print. And to me, like photography, which is a form of fine art, paintings, illustrations, design, including photography, is best-served in print, unless you’re going to go look at it in a museum or a gallery, not online. I think being able to search for information and having a knowledge-base of what’s at your disposal on the Internet, is extraordinary, and a must-have resource for discovering art, music, and photography, but in terms of actually experiencing it, I think it’s best-served in an actual publication.

Making Tally Ho! a reality

So with Tally Ho! Phil showed me this idea. I told him that I was going to put together a team of editors, which he really didn’t have. At the time he just had a bunch of pictures, which reminded me of Antenna. What I really loved about Antenna was we were able to create a comprehensive bible to product, and I felt like what Antenna was to product, Tally Ho! would be to fine art. We would create a very easy navigation for people to experience work by fine artists, and also to learn who these people were in a very short-form format that would open their eyes to art; so if they were purveyors of art, they would respect it and appreciate it, and want to, obviously, engage in it. And if they were novices, they would feel like they could immerse themselves in it and learn from it. And so, I think Tally Ho!, unlike Respect, is not a commercial play, it’s much more curated and smaller. We’re available in 125 different galleries globally. We’re in all the major, finer bookstores, Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, and then we’re in specialty shops, such as Colette in Paris. And ranging from Kidrobot to Colette, we’re really walking that line between the early adopter, curators of pop culture, and individuals that actually really love and collect fine art.

And what Phil is doing that’s different is, he’s created his own fine art, broadening the definition of artistry which includes design. And to some degree, even music is a theme that’s incorporated into it, not as a music magazine, but as in capturing celebrities from music in different ways. So Natalia Kills, is the cover, and on the flip side is David Bowie. But the reality is that the David Bowie piece is really about Mick Rock, who’s a legendary rock photographer, who captured the 70s. And Natalia is, if you look at the feature, a really Avant-garde photo essay that was shot by Phil himself.

It’s Phil Knott’s Tally Ho! Phil is a curator, who also incorporates his own work. I mean, he doesn’t purport to be Andy Warhol at all; it’s not like Andy Warhol’s interview. He’s really not an egotist. It’s just really about his world and all these great people he knew. So I underwrote it, and we created a very unique partnership between the two of us. And we got three underwriters. I remember with Respect, I got a single sponsor to keep it simple. And with Tally Ho! we were very cognizant about concentrating on getting a few companies that really understood the cultural value of the publication to underwrite the first issue so that we could really get it out the door and not be dependent on multiple advertisers. And so again, Musinart, integrated hybrid agency, integrated Media Company; there are many things that you can call it, but we’re still a magazine publisher. And in the last three years for a small publisher to turn out two publications…Respect, by the way, is now bi-monthly, so we actually went up in frequency from 4 to 6, where magazines like XXL have gone from 9 to 6.

Samir Husni: Jonathan, what do you call yourself? I see your title in the magazine is publisher, but what are you really?

Jonathan Rheingold: That’s a great question, Samir. You know, I consider myself a publisher whether it’s digital or print. When you hear publisher, that may be more synonymous with magazines. When you think video, you think producer. When I was at Harris, I was very creative and I was executive publisher. At Musinart, at times, I’m like the creative director and I’m also the publisher. Because all the selling, all the content, anything we create, it has to have advertising, sponsorship, and consumers in mind. Those things don’t always work in tandem together. I almost want to reserve the right to send you an e-mail and have time to think about that question, because I think being quoted as calling myself a publisher may make me sound like I’m antiquated, but I really think it does speak to the multi-faceted aspect of selling and creating. You know, I’m not a rep. I’m not repping other people’s magazines. I create the magazine, Musinart owns the magazine, so we’re creating content, and we’re selling advertising. I’m enlisting all these great talents who create, shoot, and write for us. I’m as much of a director as Spielberg, not to put myself on the same pedestal with the man, but I’m really, from concept to creation, immersed in the entire concept like I’ve never been before. And that’s necessary. I really have to think about it. It’s a great question that I struggle with. Sometimes I struggle with what to call my company, but I feel very comfortable saying it’s an integrated media company. At the end of the day, that’s what we do. I would say I’m an integrated publisher.

Samir Husni: My last question: what keeps Jonathan up at night?

Jonathan Rheingold: I love to find solutions to my clients’ problems, challenges, and/or goals. That’s what I live by. I love coming up with solutions. I love completion. And just knowing that I’m making a difference and able to provide these efficiencies for companies that need to reach a particular audience and don’t necessarily have the budgets they used to have to do it. And I’m still able to create efficiency for them. But I think solving problems and creating campaigns based on my clients’ needs is extraordinarily gratifying. I am a sales person at heart, but to be a great salesperson in any medium, whether television, radio, various facets of digital, or print; you have to be creative. And I don’t mean creative as only having great ideas; I mean creative where you have to be extraordinarily consultative, and a lot of my sales calls and sales meetings, and even the RFPs we get, are highly consultative. It’s going way beyond, “Hey, what can you sell us?” to “Hey, what can you create for us?” The whole thing that keeps me up at night is retaining the ability to create these things and come up with solutions. That’s what makes it all very gratifying.

Samir Husni: Thank you.

h1

The Entire History of the Super Bowl in One TD…

February 2, 2013

TD34TD12

As the eyes of the nation are transfixed on every available screen to watch the Super Bowl, one magazine summed the entire history of the Super Bowl in one collector’s issue. Print scores a touchdown on the pages of TD, the “Fresh Fly Football” magazine. The magazine released an entire issue that ranks the teams of the Super Bowl from Super Bowl I to XLVI.

“I am proud of this issue for the historic knowledge it provides to anyone who cares about the game of football,” writes editor-in-chief Ben Osborne. He offers the following advice to the readers of the magazine, “Leave this thing on your coffee table and invoke debate and learning for all your guests.”

The magazine published four covers featuring some of the greatest Super Bowl players: Terry Bradshaw, Tom Brady, Joe Montana and Walter Payton.

Solid advice, solid knowledge and no hours of research required. TD did the homework for you. Pick up a copy today and relive each and every Super Bowl ever played.

h1

Got Hacked? Time to Rethink The Uninterrupted, Incognito Power of Print

February 1, 2013

300x250promo So The New York Times computers were hacked! It is not the first time, nor will it be the last. The digital age has ushered in a new profession and a whole bunch of new professionals: hacking, and those hackers out there waiting to be hired. (By the way, those digital hackers have their own magazine, 2600, The Hacker Quarterly. It is a printed magazine to avoid being hacked, I guess).

Indulge with me for few lines before we go back to hackers and hacking. It is the perfect time to bring some common sense to our media thinking in this digital “ready to be hacked” digital world. It is time to talk about the power of print in a digital age. Picture 13

Picture 13Imagine that you’re reading your favorite magazine or newspaper online; the article has you totally captivated. Suddenly, between the reasons your significant other is cheating on you, and the downfall of your entire relationship, a pop-up ad appears and blocks the entire sentence from view. You’re frantic and angry. How dare this ad invade and interrupt your reading; who do these advertisers think they are? You’re the audience, the customer. Without you, there wouldn’t be a need for the website. Finally, trying valiantly to close the dratted blurb, you accidentally click on it and find yourself reading about antacid relief instead of how to save your love life.

Now while this may sound a bit dramatic and farcical, that isn’t the point. Reading magazines and newspapers online, or anything for that matter, is a far different experience than reading the printed counterpart. For one thing, the distractions, and for another, this one probably the biggest and most important reason; the explanation for that antacid ad popping up on your page in the first place: no privacy in the Big Brother world of the Internet.

Your choice of reading material is your own personal and private business, correct? Wrong, if you’re reading online. So, if you don’t want someone to know you perused the latest issue of Hustler, or hit Google for an article on “how to build a bomb” just because your curiosity got the better of you, you better pick those selections up in print. No eyes on that page but your own.

Without a doubt, anonymity does not walk hand in hand with you in the digital sector, because whether you realize it or not, those URL’s do have eyes.

How many times have you opened up your e-mail and saw that your inbox had 15 new arrivals, but your Spam had over 100? There’s a reason for that, of course. Those eyes that are constantly watching have been sending Morse code blinks back to the powers-that-be at headquarters, coordinating and compiling a list of simply irresistible items for you to spend your money on, custom-tailored to fit your needs. And while this, in and of itself, isn’t entirely a bad thing, it’s a total diversion that you simply do not need or want at all times.

Picture 6 And yes, I started this article with a reference to The New York Times’ computers being hacked. Well they are not alone. Ask yourself, have you ever been hacked? If so, then you know that feeling you get in the pit of your stomach when you realize the security of your e-mails or social media sites have been compromised. It’s not a pleasant experience.

Another problem you don’t have to worry about with print. I promise you, the odds of your printed magazine or newspaper being hacked are slim to none.

And those public Wi-Fi connections that lure you with a latté and a delicious scone are another very dangerous environment if you don’t want miscreants and strangers getting access to your private information. The digital age can be both wonderful and costly, in more ways than one.

The beauty of the print experience, however, is personal and private. I guarantee, if you are following a recipe, step-by-step, on how to make that perfect soufflé, there will not be some advertisement for stomach acid covering up any of your steps. That ad will be artfully and quietly placed beyond the ingredients page. There will be no heated battle between your attention and the advertiser. It goes against the laws of magazine nature, where even the ads add significance to the experience.

Take Vogue, for example, the mere fact that you bought the title shows that you have no intention of skipping any ads. Simply put, with a publication like Vogue, chances are that part of the reason you’re buying it in the first place is the ads. It’s all about that print experience.

And advertisers are realizing this, as ad revenues for print are showing a healthy comeback.

Magazines can have a multitude of experiences between their covers, from the content adventures, to the visual encounters, to even the actual product itself. Print has always had that 3D effect – height, width and size. Sometimes the uniqueness of a magazine’s shape can be enough to classify it as its own special phenomenon.

But with digital, the product is whatever your screen size is, without exception. No matter how many layers you apply in digital, at the end of the day it’s still a flat shape.

And in no other medium besides print, will your customer actually admire and read the ads. Not even television. Other than the Super Bowl, where the ads have become a competitive event unto themselves; can you think of any other case where viewers actually want ads? The phrase channel-surfing came into existence with the invention of the TV remote and was probably coined while some poor, impatient viewer flipped past a dozen commercials.

And the power of print is there, in your face. You don’t have to shake your mouse, locate your website and then start closing pop-ups to scan the page for a story you want to read. The magazine’s cover has mouse-less access. Amazing, isn’t it? From beginning to end – the entire contents are encapsulated within its pages. The stories unfold at your pace and without anyone else seeing what you’re reading.

My grandson loves his iPad and all his digital paraphernalia. And well he should. It is a digital age and we all benefit from that fact. However, his mom and dad do regulate his time spent with all the gadgets. But when it’s bedtime and he wants a story to read, he doesn’t reach for his iPad and begin scrolling, he walks over to his bookshelves, into the real world of print, and selects a favorite title. It’s a timeless ritual for a child. A book, a real print book, means adventure into new worlds, color pages he can turn himself, characters that seem to leap off the pages, enabling him to trace their raised outlines.

There is no other experience like it, certainly not a digital screen.

And not once have I heard my grandson’s parents tell him to put down the book and stop reading, stop using his imagination.

That’s the power of print.

Picture 14
PS: This column was published on CommPRO.biz on January 31.

h1

Print Magazines Are NOT Going the Way Vinyl Went… and That’s Why.

January 28, 2013

300x250promo Comparing magazines with music is like comparing a kite to the wind that carries it across the sky. The kite is tangible, and watching it brings its own kind of joy to the experience; the wind is gossamer with no visual substance, yet as real an experience as your hair lifted off your neck on a hot day.

It doesn’t matter to you how you receive that breeze when your skin is hot and sticky. It can be from an opened window in your kitchen, to the sun roof in your car; the end result you anticipate is the same…to cool off from that sweet breeze.

The kite floats back down to you when you’re finished running across the field with it, the diamond shape bright with spring colors and virtually alive from its race across the blue sky, plastic still popping and breathing from the exertion. It’s substantial and real…you can touch and feel its presence.

It’s the same thing with magazines and music. When people compare the two by saying something like, “Magazines are going the way of vinyl,” the observation is moot. First of all, vintage is back and trending like crazy in today’s world. And second, magazines haven’t gone anywhere, unlike vinyl records; check out your newsstands, they’re robust and healthy.

But the mootness of the observation is this: music has always been like the wind, ethereal and invisible to the eye. Your favorite song flowing out of your car radio or your iPod is an active participant in the joyful experience you are receiving, but it’s not a tactile presence that you can hold in your hand. It’s the sound of the melody romancing your ears that gives you that bliss. And to you, at that moment in time, you could care less whether you hear it from a radio, an iPod, a CD, or a twelve piece orchestra for that matter. You just want to hear your song.

But the experience of holding a printed magazine and reading from it is a very real occurrence. The pages are slick and smooth to your touch. The contents are what you selected, your choice of material. It’s an intimate and personal experience, devoid of any of the interruptions of pop-up ads or infinite internet eyes taking note of every click of your mouse. The advertising and editorial content live in harmony next to each other, complementing rather than annoying and fighting over your attention. Ads flow naturally and in a very logical and systematic way, so that skipping them seems almost sacrilegious to the experience. Music, on the other hand, is all about the tunes, the musicians, the band and not the vinyl, the tape recorder or even the iPod.

samir.mag_.music_And while many people fall in love with the artist or group of their favorite song, and revel in a fantasy world created by some mystical connection with the singer, the odds of anyone falling in love with the editor or publisher of a magazine are pretty much slim to none; at least, not without a little one-on-one wining and dining first.

So to shackle magazines and music together in some comparison of antiquity is not only unfounded, but also ridiculous.

Vinyl records did take a backseat to other platforms, such as 8-tracks, cassette tapes, CDs and ultimately, digital apparatus, but magazines haven’t been replaced by anything. They have grown new branches, with their digital counterparts, but no one has replaced the tangible experience of holding a magazine. Not even the iPad. These accoutrements only enhance the print experience, they don’t replace them.

Digital is a new media; it’s here, it’s not going anywhere and we all enjoy its amenities. But it doesn’t replace the print experience. And it isn’t trying to. Digital isn’t killing print, publishers are. Instead of forcing the death of print down our customers’ throats, why don’t we give them what they really want and encourage both?

There was some controversy recently with Beyonce when it was reported that she may have been lip-syncing when she sang the Star Spangled Banner at the inauguration of President Obama, the real-live experience versus the virtual one, minus any imperfections.

This matters to the topic only as a reference as to how real and virtual can go hand-in-hand; how one can use the digital to enhance the physical. It’s a perfect union, really. Union being the operative word. There are times the physical, the tangible is what you want and need. Other moments, the virtual realms answer the call. But isn’t it nice to have both?

So when I hear someone say, “Magazines are going the way of vinyl,” and that they have so much in common, I have only this to say:

“I will surrender one thing to those out there who insist upon the similarities of magazines and music: they both start with the letter ‘M’.”

P.S.: The above column first appeared on CommPRO.biz website Jan. 27, 2013.

h1

Glenn Hansen, President & CEO at BPA Worldwide Reacts to My “All Good Print Magazines Go to Digital Heaven… or Do They?”

January 26, 2013

My friend Bob Sacks (www.bosacks.com) republished my blog entry All Good Print Magazines Go to Digital Heaven… Or Do They? on his electronic e-letter. Glenn Hansen, President and CEO at BPA Worldwide, responded to my blog entry to Bob. Bob, in turn, published the response on his e-letter. I have asked Mr. Hansen permission to post his response on my blog so my readers will have the opportunity to read it. Permission was granted and here is Glenn Hansen’s response:

Bob, Samir, as he often does to me, strikes a chord.

Can’t he come up with some successful converts to only digital to shine a light on the way forward?

Too easy to find the failures. He writes as if to say if you convert to digital only you are doomed. I realize that he is not saying that, but that is an impression I am left with. It’s as if he is saying, “if you are not a success in print, you cannot be a success in only digital”. Of course that is ludicrous seeing how many web sans print media outlets there are.

I agree that a print product may not sell as many subs or single copies as a tablet version as they did in print, but that may not be the goal of the media company. Further, undeniably it took the print version a number of years to get to it’s current rate base and not immediately out of the gate. I agree that from the conversion of print to an only digital product, if management loses its sense of purpose, the digital product will fail, but it’s not because it’s an “only digital” product, it’s because management did not make a compelling product taking full advantage of the technology available and were not good marketers getting the PR out.

SH wrote, “If your print product isn’t connecting with an audience, is it really going to flourish among a billion more nondescript URLs or a million other apps?”

Hell YES. But Samir seems to think it must flourish at the same rate base as its predecessor. That is not a requirement for financial success.

The smart entrepreneurial great communicator technologist can convert most any print brand into a going business as a only digital product. But I predict the pendulum will swing back on even the best of these folk and they will find print to be an avenue for communicating the digital brand.

Just me in the peanut gallery.
( Submitted BY Glenn Hansen, President & CEO at BPA Worldwide, name used upon request)

So, what do you think and do you have any success stories of print magazines that left print behind and are now thriving in the digital heaven? Please do not hesitate to comment, be specific and give me examples. Thank you.

h1

Mr. Magazine™ Musings: All Good Print Magazines Go to Digital Heaven… Or Do They?

January 24, 2013

300x250promo When a publication decides its earthly existence as a print life form is no longer a viable option and instead takes on a digital-only presence, is it really a heaven-sent opportunity or is it actually a gentle nudge by the minions of magazine hell to push it into its final resting place? If your print product isn’t connecting with an audience, is it really going to flourish among a billion more nondescript URLs or a million other apps?

Think about it, please. And take a look at a few lost souls while you’re at it.

Flashback 2006

When Teen People closed its print magazine in 2006, it decided to make digital confetti out of the pages and toss the remnants on the print product’s grave in celebration. With a still healthy circulation of 1.5 million in the second half of 2005, Teen People displaced about 50 employees—with the promise of finding them spots within the company—and, according to Ann Moore and John Huey, set about to “invest in the brand through Teenpeople.com, which shows promise and growth.”

Flash Forward 2013

The only presence that remains of Teenpeople.com today is at the home of the magazine’s parents: PeopleMagazine.com. Apparently, when living on its own didn’t quite pan out, mommy and daddy allowed their child to come home.

Too bad some of the other print magazines that went digital-only didn’t have parents quite so affluent.

Going digital-only screams salvation to some print products that are battling low ad pages and declining circulation, but the question remains: If you’re not selling ads in your ink-on-paper magazine, what in the world makes you think you’re going to make gazillions of dollars on the web?

Even with automated ad sales systems, consumer magazine sites aren’t garnering all that much from their digital counterparts.

Flashback 2009

Gourmet in print became another headstone in the “Ink-on-Paper Cemetery,” when Condè Nast killed it in 2009. Just the previous year, Gourmet had had a circulation of around one million, but its ad pages had dropped. And the magazine wasn’t doing as well as its sister magazine, Bon Appétit, which was also owned by Condè Nast. But it would soon be reborn as an app for iPad called Gourmet Live.

Flash Forward 2013

Gourmet Live is officially done, as far as any new content is concerned. According to a spokesperson for Condè Nast, the app itself will remain intact, but it won’t be updated. However, Gourmet.com will continue to be updated as the main platform of the brand.

Where have we heard that before?

Flashback 2011

American Media, Inc. (AMI), a leading publisher of celebrity magazines, announced the launch of Reality Weekly, the first magazine devoted only to Reality TV shows and its new mega-stars. Included in the hype around this blockbuster idea was the companion website for folks who just couldn’t get enough of the inside info that must surely abound on television shows such as these.

The launch was fan-fared with the fact that the magazine would sell at all the mass merchant locations: Wal-Mart, Kroger, Dollar General, Kmart, A&P and Rite-Aid and would be priced a mere $1.79 (“Less Money, More Fun”). Really.

“I’m proud to introduce a magazine that gives readers the news they want about television’s most popular genre. Print remains one of our most effective mediums, which is why Reality Weekly will be a showcase launch of 2012,” said David J. Pecker, AMI’s Chairman, President and CEO, at the time.

Flash Forward 2013

Before 2012 was over, the magazine folded. The website hasn’t been updated since July 2012. However, that same month AMI folded the magazine, it announced that it was naming Joe Bilman as its first chief digital officer and set the lofty goal (at the time Mr. Bilman was hired) of building its digital revenue to $50 million. Accordingly, AMI resolved to try Reality Weekly as a free tablet app that summer.

They followed that with a big splashy ad that screamed at the consumer: “Reality Weekly…We’re Going Digital.”

But where are they now?

The magazines mentioned here are not the only ones. What about Elle Girl, Cosmo Girl? Digital brands such as PC Mag and Sporting News, while still breathing that oh-so thin digital air, are mere shadows of their former print selves.

When you lose contact with the people who matter, your customers, and treat them as numbers instead of members of this community of experiences you have created for them, you’re going to lose them, whether the neighborhood is print or digital.

And what about Newsweek?

As the New York Times put it so eloquently: From the start, it was an unwieldy melding of two newsrooms: a legacy print magazine, Newsweek, combined with an irreverent digital news site, The Daily Beast.

Now the 79-year-old, once highly-respected news magazine must co-exist next to an entity called “The Daily Beast,” its new significant other.

The sacred vow that some publications make with their new life partner, digital, is usually a last-ditch effort to save a customer and product bond that was broken many times earlier. When you have a brand so highly known in print and you suddenly jerk that trusted and cherished product out from under your customers’ feet, why do you bemoan your fate when, one day, you have to take that digital shingle down for good?

Right now, Newsweek is looking for digital heaven, as others are. Let’s just hope the abyss that lies before them doesn’t lead to purgatory instead.

The Moral of the Story?

At the end of the day if we don’t create a community where we make our customers feel like members instead of just numbers after a dollar sign, we won’t have anything to publish in print or digital—no long-lasting relationship, anyway, merely a one-night stand.

The minute you lose your connectivity with your customers (readers, users, viewers, listeners, whatever you call them), you’re in trouble. And if you fail to connect with them time and time again, even going to that digital heaven online can’t save you. Cut your losses, let your magazine die in peace and don’t torture it anymore.

Stop being in the game of numbers and change to a game of members instead.

Author’s Note: This column appeared on the Folio magazine blog on Jan. 22, 2013.

h1

There is Nothing Bobo about “Anikibo.” Using Digital to Bring a “Print Revival.” The Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Anikibo Founder Deborah Causton

January 22, 2013

Picture 1“Anikibo is the first peer-to-peer online marketplace specifically for independent publishers making, creating and
publishing beautiful physical magazines, zines & comics. As a curated e-commerce platform it enables publishers
to sell direct to customers via a one check-out process…” so starts the press release announcing this new e-commerce venture using digital to sell print.

The brainchild of Deborah Causton, Anikibo was born of her passion for the printed word “and the frustration of not being able to bring home everything of newly discovered materials from trips abroad. Spending the last 10 years building websites it was time to merge the two avenues of her creative and digital life.”

Intrigued by the concept of both using digital to sell print and the idea of a “print revival” led to this Mr. Magazine™ Interview with Deborah Causton, the founder and creator of Anikibo. Anikibo’s Facebook page, all magazines sold on Anikibo are selected for producing products which are deemed to be unique, clever, beautiful, and creative and have an absolute passion for paper!

Have you ever heard anything more beautiful? Anikibo’s creator, Deborah Causton, believes there is a resurgence emerging with the printed product (of which, I agree…if I ever thought there was an extinction on the horizon for print at all), but the fact remains, the naysayers out there certainly did. Maybe the birth of Anikibo will once and for all show the killjoys of print what most of us have known all along: While you’re scrolling and squinting, the rest of the world is enjoying turning pages…ink on paper pages!

So, sit back and enjoy my recent interview with a delightful lady who is using digital to support print in a unique and innovative way!

The Sound-bites:

On the definition of the phrase “print revival”: Ultimately, I guess it would just be nice to see the print industry bathed in positive headlines again. It’s a digital age for sure, but like you said “…it took 500 years to build up this tradition. You don’t just throw up the white flag and say, ‘OK, everything is digital now.’ ”

On plans to promote Anikibo and the story behind the name: Someone told me once when launching a website that a 20/80 rule applied: 20% website / 80% marketing. As for the name, it came from a nightclub in Luxembourg, where I used to live.

On whether or not there is going to be a print product, or just a digital platform to sell print: There are so many technological avenues to be explored – this will be my primary focus. As to whether I’ll actually print something from it, maybe eventually, but probably a magazine!

DeborahCaustonAnd now here is the Mr. Magazine™ Interview; in typical Mr. Magazine™ Interview lightly edited style, with Deborah Causton of Anikibo.

Samir Husni: You used the phrase “print revival” in your press release, how would you define the meaning of this phrase?

Deborah Causton: Ultimately, I guess it would just be nice to see the print industry bathed in positive headlines again.

It’s a digital age for sure, but like you said “…it took 500 years to build up this tradition. You don’t just throw up the white flag and say, ‘OK, everything is digital now.’ ” I own the digital suite: smart phone, tablet, laptop, smart TV – but they’re all just practical objects that basically facilitate the delivery of digital content. I don’t really treasure them or the content on them; I replace them with the next model, watch the next episode, read the next item.

We all got excited by the new stuff, but we don’t love it in the same way. That’s why we’re seeing resurgence in the popularity of vinyl. There’s a strong sense of nostalgia from the emotional connection we got from physical objects like magazines, records, books and zines, especially those that represent a passion – we won’t let that go so easily. In my opinion, this is the driving force behind the coming print revival.

Unfortunately, I don’t think vinyl will manage to avoid becoming obsolete, mostly because of the cumbersome technology required to play vinyl records. Magazines don’t face this limitation. They can and have embraced the technologies available to them. We still have plenty of time before somebody pulls the plug on the production of paper.

Samir Husni: What are your plans to promote Anikibo (and what is the story behind the name)?

Deborah Causton: Someone told me once when launching a website that a 20/80 rule applied: 20% website / 80% marketing. Working almost completely independently, I’m sure I will face some challenges in the promotion – a lot of trial and error no doubt.

The formulation of this project began as far back as 2007, but the timing feels right now somehow. I just have to protect my investment and announce to as many people as I can reach, leveraging myself from the positive reactions I receive. I’m of course greatly thankful to the magazines and zines that have decided to stock thus far. It’s very encouraging to get this support having come somewhat out of nowhere.

As for the name, it came from a nightclub in Luxembourg, where I used to live. It was called Anikibobo, but I learned that “bobo” means silly or stupid in Portuguese so I opted to drop the second “bo”.

Samir Husni: You are based in Berlin, Anikibo is a British company, and you are dealing with publications from 7 countries… tell me your story…

Deborah Causton: I’ve been somewhat of a transient person. I’m British, but only by birth. I’ve found many other places that have become home. Currently Berlin is that place. My ambition for Anikibo was that it would always be an international platform. It is in some ways a selfish development since I wanted easier access to magazines and zines I’d find when travelling, but never had the space in my suitcase to bring back with me.

The only reason for incorporating the business in the UK is the ease with which it can be done.

Samir Husni: Is it passion that drives you or a business plan?

Deborah Causton: I’m not sure if I should admit publicly that I don’t actually have a business plan per se, but then it looks like I just did! Ideas on the other hand – ten to the dozen! My initial plan for an online marketplace goes back as far as 2001. I’d traipse up to Portobello Market in London with a friend who was selling handmade bags and scarfs. We’d be standing there at 3am on a Sunday morning queuing for a good stall, freezing cold, with a questionable cup of coffee in hand. It occurred to me then that the internet would be the perfect place for all these independent designers to get together and sell their stuff. I should have got my act together then: 4 years later Etsy was launched. Luckily, there are plenty of independent niches that haven’t been organized yet. I’ve been toying with this current incarnation of Anikibo since Colophon (Luxembourg’s Magazine Symposium).

Samir Husni: Are you planning to produce a print product to help sell the publications? Or it is going to be only a digital platform to sell print?

Deborah Causton: I studied graphic design, but have been very involved in tech for the last 12 years. One of the things that excite me most about this project is that I can combine my two passions. There are so many technological avenues to be explored – this will be my primary focus. As to whether I’ll actually print something from it, maybe eventually, but probably a magazine!

Samir Husni: Any other thing you would like to add…. such as will you be mailing publications overseas, adding countries, etc…

Deborah Causton: The platform has already been set up to enable worldwide distribution. Any publisher from around the world is invited to stock at Anikibo, providing they meet the minimum criteria: they love to make!

Samir Husni: Thank you. Check Anikibo for yourself at www.anikibo.com
300x250promo

h1

The “Mr. Magazine™ Manifesto 2013”: PUBLISHING IS BELIEVING AND 12 OTHER MANTRAS OF WISDOM

January 8, 2013

photo Timeless Collectability will be the mantra for 2013. In the magazine world, 2012 brought about the death of two print weeklies (one originating in 2012 and the other from 1933), along with their less-than-promising resurrection online. It also redirected our insights to the value of diversity and print’s need to be a collectible force.

To engage the magazine audience, one must be willing to go beyond the informative and straight to the incomparable. One must become the king’s ransom for readers and never relinquish that role. One must provide the timeliness and timelessness that only print, in its inexplicable way, can. And one must divert from, and direct to, the continuum that is digital. If this seems contradictory and impossible … read on and I’ll lead you into 2013’s glowing light surrounding the future of print.

1. The future of print is becoming more a collector’s item than a disposable item. A magazine should possess some collectible value that offers something timely and timeless.

2. Think integrated print and digital. Your printed magazine has to keep the audience engaged, keep the advertiser engaged, perhaps through mobile linkage.

3. Killing a magazine in print, hoping it will survive on the web never worked, is not working and never will work. Once you are out of sight, you are out of mind. Even the “successes” in this case are a fraction of their print predecessors.

4. When someone tells you that print is dead or there’s no more room for magazines, give them $10 and send them to the nearest newsstand and ask them to buy a copy. Then let them judge for themselves whether there is room for more magazines or not.

5. Fear of failure and statistical analysis are the biggest reasons for doing nothing, in terms of launches, finding a new market, or creating a new brand.

6. As ever, remember that we are in the business of audience first, customers first. Not pixels on a screen … not ink on paper. Once you lose sight of the audience, you are headed for disaster. It’s simple: You need to offer the relevant message, via the relevant medium, to the relevant audience.

7. Invest in print, ink and paper. Feeling and touching are the first step to engaging with the experience. Cheap products mean cheap experience.

8. There is hope. More than 200 new titles were launched with a regular frequency in 2012 and more than 600 new titles as specials and annuals.

9. Like all creations, magazines have a time to be born and a time to die. No, not the demise of a genre of magazine; rather the loss of some titles and birth of others.

10. Unless your magazine content provides the readers with a “losing themselves and their sense of time” experience, you are better off killing the magazine.

11. It is time for someone to find a new name for all the digital stuff out there. As long as we refer to it as “replicas”, I know we are not there yet. When was the last time you called television, radio with pictures?

12. And Keep in mind, as a Dutch publisher often reminds me: “publishing is believing.”

So, keep the faith and go on publishing…and remember these words of wisdom: When times are tough and dark, start dreaming; when things are easy and light, keep on walking. Also don’t ever forget: print is the mirror and digital is merely its reflection. Let the believing begin…

300x250promoSamir Husni, Ph.D., is founder (2009) and director of the Magazine Innovation Center at the University of Mississippi’s Meek School of Journalism and New Media. The former Ole Miss journalism department chairman’s Mr. Magazine™ monicker comes from his tracking more than 20,000 launches since 1986, when his Guide to New Magazines debuted. The 28th edition of the Guide (Nautilus Publishing/Oxford, Miss.) will be released in April 2013.

The Mr. Magazine™ Manifesto 2013 was published first in min Media Industry Newsletter on Jan. 7, 2013.
Picture 68

h1

Killing Me Softly With Her “Talk”: Why Tina Brown’s 10 Excuses for Killing Newsweek Are ALL DEAD WRONG…

December 31, 2012

1356279090281.cached When I was interviewed last October by the Associated Press about Tina Brown’s decision to kill the print edition of Newsweek, I put the failure of Newsweek, to the surprise of very few, right on the shoulders of Ms. Brown. Only a former managing editor of TIME (who by the way was pushed up and out of the magazine that at least five years ago stopped counting Newsweek as a competitor) said about my remarks: “No one said anything stupider than Samir Husni.” That same editor, turned media columnist, amazingly appears in the last issue of Newsweek talking about a competition that ceased to exit years ago).

Heaven forbid that one ever criticize an editor for a magazine failure. It is always someone else’s fault… advertisers, circulation, the weather, anything or anyone but the editor. An editor’s choice of content, covers, or even writers, let alone, an editor’s knowledge of the audience of a magazine, never makes up a recipe for failure. Right? Well, that’s what you are lead to believe reading Tina Brown’s final editorial in the “#LastPrintIssue” of Newsweek.

The content of Newsweek for the last two years, from Princess Di at 50, to the First Gay President, to the famous sexy food cover, are three examples of how content (i.e. bad content, irrelevant content to a magazine’s audience, etc.) can and will lead to your demise. Remember Talk?

images-2imagesimages-1

Well, here are ten excuses I was able to discern from Ms. Brown’s own editorial about the demise of the print edition of Newsweek and my comments on each excuse:

10: To “see the full evolution of the spanking-new, all-digital Newsweek Global…” if it is going to be anything like the evolution of the spanking-new print edition of Newsweek two years ago, don’t brace yourself for any positive surprises. If you could not make it “national” are you kidding me about making it “global?”

9: “It’s been a turbulent two-year journey (since the marriage to the Daily Beast), culminating in our decision to leave print…” I guess the marriage was a blast that created a schizophrenic double personality entity that was neither Newsweek nor the Daily Beast. The decision not to merge the Daily Beast into Newsweek.com actually spelled this inevitable doom. In fact this greatly undermined the Newsweek brand because in effect it had no digital outlet — both editorially and in terms of advertising. This decision was totally as a result of Ms. Brown’s vanity about the Daily Beast.

8: “Most of the boldface bylines and star writers who defined the brand had flown the Newsweek coop…” I wonder why some of them went to TIME?

7: “There was no executive editor… no news editor, no managing editor, no features editor, no ….” And I thought that was the reason they brought on Tina Brown.

6: “Advertisers had peeled off…” and now they are going to come back with full force into the all-digital edition? By the way, is the Daily Beast making any money online?

5: The magazine was located in an office “reminiscent of the Stasi headquarters in East Berlin.” When everything else fails, blame it on the brick and mortar building. Newsweek logo on its own building is no longer “in the eye-line of its swaggering competitor in the Time-Life Building.”

4: Newsweek is “embracing a digital medium that all our competitors will one day need to embrace… we are ahead of the curve.” Have you heard of TIME, The Economist, The Week, Bloomberg Businessweek? And by the way how is it that Bloomberg Businessweek has survived, and is thriving–after it was sold for one dollar? By the way, just for the historical record: Newsweek came into being 10 years after TIME was born, and Newsweek’s circulation was always behind TIME in its entire 79 years of publishing. Talk about being ahead of the curve.

3: The re-born, all-digital Newsweek will take “its readers to territory that is new and uncharted.” Wow… I wonder if the majority of the Newsweek readers are avid digital readers who are leaving print by the droves and are willing or wanting to take the “uncharted” road? If the “chartered” road did not work, do you truly believe that the “uncharted” road will? And if it is such a “new-spanking” entity based on 80 years of history, why abandon Newsweek’s main audience in the heartland of America? Under Ms. Brown, Newsweek has become a magazine created for and about the coasts, and a “newsmagazine” like Newsweek is, and should be, about all of America.

2: “We say sayonara to print, we thank our 1.5 million loyal readers…” I guess Ms. Brown does not believe in readership studies that estimate how many readers a magazine has per issue, while the 1.5 million circulation is the rate base number given to advertisers. There is a big difference between readers and subscribers in the magazine business. well, of course, unless the magazine had only one reader per copy, since the readership numbers are absent from Newsweek’s media kit. And, by the way, Ms. Brown said “sayonara” for the loyal magazine readers when she brought in her 80s and 90s sensibility of what would shock and/or titillate. Those were the days my friends, and contrary to believe, they did end.

1: “…Wish us luck and join us… in our all-digital future.” Well, to paraphrase the other Tina, “What’s luck got to do with it?” Oops, sorry, that was “What’s love got to do with it.” But you get my point. As one of my friends once told me, “Ms. Brown doesn’t and never has understood America.” It is all about understanding and knowing your audience; not luck or love has anything to do with it.

Well, my prediction, out of sight is indeed out of mind. Thanks, Newsweek, for the memories, may you rest in peace or pieces as you, that is, Ms. Brown, wishes. And if you ever think that the Daily Beast has a higher value as a brand than Newsweek, think not once, but twice and thrice for that matter.

For the rest of the printed magazines out there (all 10,000 print consumer magazines distributed on the nation’s newsstands), fear not, print is here to stay, alongside with digital and whatever new platforms that are yet to be invented. Bad content and irrelevant content on any platform will continue to die regardless of the device. Enough said.